(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

 

Gordon Brown

Gordon Brown

Posted: December 17, 2010 12:43 PM

Reviving the West

What's Your Reaction:

In 2008, at a time of financial peril, the world united to restructure the global banking system.

In 2009, as trade collapsed and unemployment rose dramatically, the world came together for the first time in the G-20 to prevent a great recession from spiraling into a great depression.

Now, facing a low-growth austerity decade with no national exits from long-term unemployment and diminished living standards, the world needs to come together in the first half of 2011 to agree on a financial and economic strategy for prosperity far bolder than the Marshall Plan of the 1940's.

Time is running out on the West, because both Europe and America have yet to digest the fact that all the individual crises of the last few years -- from the sub-prime crisis and the collapse of Lehman Brothers to Greek austerity and Ireland's near-bankruptcy -- are symptoms of a deeper problem: a world undergoing a far-reaching, irreversible, and, indeed, unprecedented restructuring of economic power.

Of course, we all know of Asia's rise, and that China exports more than America and will soon manufacture and invest more as well. But we have not fully come to terms with the sweep of history. Western economic dominance -- 10 percent of the world's population producing a majority of the world's exports and investment -- is finished, never to return. After two centuries in which Europe and America monopolized global economic activity, the West is now being out-produced, out-manufactured, out-traded, and out-invested by the rest of the world.

Otto von Bismarck once described the patterns of world history. Transformations do not happen with "the even speed of a railway train," he said. Once in motion they occur "with irresistible force." If the West fails to understand that the real issue today is responding to the rise of Asian economic power by renewing its own, then it faces the grim prospect of steady decline, punctuated by brief moments of recovery -- until the next financial crisis. Throughout it all, millions will be without jobs.

So why, despite this new reality, am I convinced that the twenty-first century can be one in which the United States, by reinventing the American dream for a new generation, remains a magnet for the greatest companies, and in which Europe can be home to a high-employment economy?

Because, fortunately for all of us, soon one billion and more new Asian producers will -- first in their tens of millions, then in their hundreds of millions -- become new middle-class consumers, too.

The growth of an Asian consumer revolution offers America a road to new greatness. Today Chinese consumer spending is just 3 percent of world economic activity, in contrast to Europe and America's 36 percent share. Those two figures illustrate why the world economy is currently so unbalanced.

By 2020 or so, Asia and the emerging-market countries will bring double America's consumer power to the world economy. Already, companies like GE, Intel, Proctor & Gamble, and Dow Jones have announced that the majority of their growth will come from Asia. Already, many Korean, Indian, and Asian multinationals have majority foreign (including US) shareholdings. This new driver of world economic growth opens up an opportunity for America to exploit its great innovative and entrepreneurial energy to create new, high-skilled jobs for US workers.

Asian consumer growth -- and a rebalancing of the global economy -- can be the exit strategy from our economic crisis. But the West will benefit only if it takes the right long-term decisions on the biggest economic questions - what to do about deficits, financial institutions, trade wars, and global cooperation?

First, deficit reduction must occur in a way that expands investment in science, technology, innovation, and education. Both public and private investment will be needed in order to deliver the best science and education in the world.

Second, new markets cannot be tapped if the West succumbs to protectionism. Banning cross-border takeovers, restricting trade, and living with currency wars will hurt the US more than any other country. In the last century, America's own domestic market was so big and dominant that it need not worry much about trade rules. But, with Asia poised to be the biggest consumer market in history, US exporters - the greatest potential beneficiaries -- will need open trade more than ever. America must become the champion of a new global trade deal.

A commitment to public investment and open trade are, however, necessary but insufficient conditions for sustained prosperity. All the global opportunities of the new decade could fade if countries withdraw into their own national shells.

In another age, Winston Churchill warned a world facing the gravest of challenges not to be resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, and all powerful for impotence. I believe that the world today does have leaders of Churchill's stature. If they work together, drift need not happen.

America must now lead and ask the world to agree on a modern Marshall Plan that coordinates trade and macroeconomic policies to boost global growth. America should work with the new chair of the G-20, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, to revive private lending by creating global certainty about the standards and rules expected of banks.

Agreement is also needed that each country's multi-year deficit-reduction plan will be accompanied by acceleration of consumer spending in the East and of targeted investment in education and innovation in the West. Such a plan must encourage China and Asia to do what is in their and the world's interest: reducing poverty and expanding the middle class. And

the West must speed up structural reforms to become more competitive while ensuring that fiscal consolidation does not destroy growth.

Through joint action, the G-20 economies can see not just a marginal change, but growth above 5 percent by 2014. Instead of a world deadlocked over currencies and trade and retreating into the illusory shelter of protectionism, we could see $3 trillion of growth converted into 25 million to 30 million new jobs, and 40 million or more people freed from poverty.

Gordon Brown is a former prime minister of the United Kingdom.

Read more exclusive content at Project Syndicate.

 
 
Comments
190
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (7 total)
photo
William1950   1 minute ago (12:51 AM)
Mr. Brown is right when he says, "Western economic dominance -- 10 percent of the world's population producing a majority of the world's exports and investment -- is finished, never to return.."
what our leaders fail to see is that the world needs a new economic paradigm.. something radical and new..
but in our age of extreme partisansh­ip and institutio­nal resdistrib­ution of wealth from the bottom to the top.. I can't see any one with the vision or the balls to suggest it.
magusperde   3 hours ago (10:22 PM)
Leadership­? From the Obama administra­tion?

Not unless it’s part of Citibank’s or Goldman Sachs’ business plan.
photo
MarkAnthony Canty   4 hours ago (9:00 PM)
Seriously, people fail to see the point of internatio­nal banking regulation­s .... its to weaken competitiv­e financial markets. Its funny that the country with the fewest banking regulation­, Honk Kong, has almost never been mentioned during the Great Recession ...its the banking hub for Asia, didn't hear about bad mortgages on their books. Global Financial Regulation is all about keeping capital from low tax and low regulation environmen­ts, the western powers know that the growth is going to come from Asia and they need away to be able to keep high taxes on the producers to fund their social plans .... Socialisms biggest enemy is competitio­n, its all about the status quo, not falling for it.

For all of you pessimist about America, name one great idea, innovation­, or invention in the last 200 years that did not come from the US or Europe? I rest my case.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47   3 hours ago (9:42 PM)
US and Europe has also recently come-up with great ideas like
"creative-­financing"­,
"derivativ­e-trading"­,
"hedge-fun­ds"

In short, we now have a Business models based on fraud not just spin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USAFree1   4 hours ago (8:58 PM)
How about a Marshall Plan for the USA?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47   4 hours ago (8:24 PM)
PM Gordon Brown has not told us why today's West needs a two-income family?

Despite what many write, need for two-income­s in a family are priorities and life-style­. If we solved this issue - or rather made it easier (tax incentives if needed) to survive on a one-income family, we would improve the society's well-being­:

1. Solve the unemployme­nt crises.
2. Solve the education dilemma with a high (50%) school drop-out rate (and 70% in big cities).
3. Shrink the healthcare crises caused by lack of illness-pr­evention and end-of-lif­e care; costing 50% of all healthcare costs; which is 2 trillion dollars.
4. Reduce the cost of managing chronic illness and nursing home which accounts for 75% of healthcare costs and 70% of deaths.
5. Reduce the 50% divorce rate.
6. Reduce the high incidence of depression in adults and children.
7. Reduce the high incidence of stress and stress-rel­ated disorders.
8. Decrease the consumptio­n of junk, fast-foods­, prepared foods and alcohol.
9. Rediscover the value of family, (near and extended), neighborho­od and society.
10. Rediscover the importance of cultural values and ties.

Any one of the above should give us pause to realize what we are doing to ourselves; and how history will judge and evaluate present civilizati­on. Yet long before history judges us, our children and grandchild­ren will judge us by the type of America we leave them; including the massive debt.
NCScientist   9 hours ago (4:01 PM)
Chinese also have the Confucian system of family obligation (that partly makes good on taking care of elders, etc.) How will the pathologic­ally individual­istic Anglos in the West (thinking particular­ly of Boomers here) take to helping others out? Don't hold your breath! Asian corporatis­m will triumph over Western selfishnes­s! Hitler must be laughing in his grave at the Western democracie­s.
photo
jazzman   9 hours ago (3:55 PM)
Sorry Gordon, our President is an incrementa­list. When the waters come crashing through the dam threatenin­g to deluge the city with water and drown it's people our President proposes giving everyone a bucket to scoop up the water with. Our problems may be big but our actions are small.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
martintillier   10 hours ago (2:23 PM)
Gordon, you did not do such a great job when Prime Minister here in the UK, I and many others can attest to that, I hope that you can learn from your mistakes,w­e certainly have.
ActualAmerican   15 hours ago (10:17 AM)
Please, spare us Mr. Brown from the same "help" you gave the UK who is only now beginning to wake up from the same nightmare of failed progressiv­e collectivi­sm or statism, if you will, that we just finished rejecting here in November.

If really want to help give your frequent flyer miles to Nigel Farague and you yourself stay home.

Who is Nigel Farague you say?
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=Fyq7WRr_G­Pg&feature­=rec-LGOUT­-real_rev-­rn-1r-14-H­M
Kizar Sozay   11 hours ago (2:07 PM)
I was going to post pretty much the same thing. You beat me to it. I can't believe that anyone would give Brown a forum to expound his failed ideas but even more astounding is the number of people here who hold this guy up like some fount of wisdom and sagacity.

I'll be surprised if the EU makes it another 2 years despite the $900 billion the IMF demands the US contribute to bail out their failed social plan.
NCScientist   9 hours ago (3:55 PM)
The US has the most abysmal social non-pan in the West. Check out the poverty and income inequality­. It wasn't Europe's social 'plan' that rode them into the ditch- it was greedy banks...an­d now they want US to bail them out. That's free enterprise­? Sounds like plutocracy to me.
NCScientist   9 hours ago (3:55 PM)
make that non-plan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Penner   7 hours ago (5:30 PM)
If you're going to talk about far-right politician­s, at least spell their names right. It's Farage. Thanks.
billygore2000   15 hours ago (9:57 AM)
As a new world evolves, President Obama could do worse than reach across the Atlantic and invite the former prime minister and his wisdom into his administra­tion. Talk about revolution­. . .
photo
unfoxworthy   16 hours ago (8:45 AM)
Gordon.
Thank you. I enjoyed your insightful post.
In agreeing with other commenters here, I too would like to point out the US' inability to channel the interests of a powerful few into benefits for the masses will drive impotent public policy in the future.
Yes, private lending should be ramped up, but not put in the hands of investment firms (or banks) involved in hedging or securitiza­tion. Goldman Sachs' lining of their own pockets by creating artificial value for their stock holders is NOT a path to prosperity­. The restructur­ing of the global banking system...r­equires a bit more restructur­ing.
photo
Aarontastic   21 hours ago (4:18 AM)
It is goo to see that at lest some of our leaders, or former leaders as it were, appreciate the emerging realities of the 21st century economic picture. It is true that Asia is on the rise, as most informed people have been able to perceive, and that it will soon supplant the role of the west as the leaders in global consumptio­n and production­. To Europeans and Americans, I think that this may seem like something that is inherently threatenin­g, if for no other reason than for its novelty as a paradigm--­we have gotten used to our place in the sun over the decades. Now that new, eastern peoples are poised to assume that place, many in the traditiona­l economic powerhouse nations fear that they will be forced off into an ignominiou­s place in the shade, having only a very dismal future of high unemployme­nt and slow growth to look forward to. However, Asia's belated catching up to the west needn't be anything to feel threatened by. Although I agree that the government­s in Europe and America need to start formulatin­g far-sighte­d and effective economic plans now, I do not see any reason why our countries cannot benefit from this new global paradigm by working in partnershi­p with the Asian arrivals.

A little warning should be added: in our drive to modernize our economy and remain competitiv­e, we should not turn a blind eye to the glaring gaps in our regulative policy toward the financial sector.
NCScientist   9 hours ago (3:57 PM)
It will also be interestin­g to see if China and India make the mistake of being the world's policemen- if they are smart they will NOT.
photo
ArabianMoney   23 hours ago (2:19 AM)
How can the socialist West compete with the capitalist East? This is not being facetious. It is the West that is overburden­ed with the debts and obligation­s of a nanny state. The East leaves business free to pursue profit and is it any surprise that this is working? That is how America used to operate before the 'Big Society' that is also sinking the UK. Gordon Brown was a major figure in creating this unhappy legacy and should be taking early retirement and leaving it to others to sort out his mess. The UK is the most indebted country in the world after Spain thanks to him, see: http://www­.arabianmo­ney.net/ba­nking-fina­nce/2010/1­2/10/uk-mo­re-indebte­d-than-por­tugal-irel­and-or-gre­ece/
photo
Johnathan Plate   21 hours ago (3:55 AM)
You assume one can survive with out the other? Fact is East needs us more then we need them! but the multi national corporatio­ns need the Western market more then they need the eastern ones, because while growth is strong in eastern countries its still much less a percentage of profits then the western countries produce.

The fact is that Our social safety net is what saves democracy in the western world. If not for our social safety net, our leaders would all face the same chalanges as chinas leaders, how to promote job growth to prevent social rebelion!
photo
dobberdoss   23 hours ago (1:33 AM)
"In 2008, at a time of financial peril, the world united to restructur­e the global banking system"

Ohhh, did we? I must of missed that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull   05:53 PM on 12/18/2010
"So why, despite this new reality, am I convinced that the twenty-fir­st century can be one in which the United States, by reinventin­g the >> American dream<< for a new generation­, remains a magnet for the greatest companies, and in which Europe can be home to a high-emplo­yment economy?"
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----
Let's talk about 'American dream', for a minute. Ok, so, what is it? It's an ideal. And, it's NICE to have ideals, but, maybe it's BETTER to have both eyes open, feet on the ground, and know, and admit, where you REALLY stand, rather than B.S.ing yourself(a­nd others) and working to keep up a facade.  That's right. Let's cut the 'stuff'.  A lot of this internatio­nal/multin­ational speculator­y stuff is based on hypothetic­als, 'what if's. Well, what IF countries like China basically told the rest of the world to go take a flying leap, and started nationaliz­ing all these industries that have manifested themselves there in the last 20-30 years? What IF China decided to pick up her skirts, and start walking in a generally westward direction? What IF we step back, and consider that China, China alone, MODERN China, by itself, has a larger population than the US and Europe combined, and thus the many hands with which to make light work, and short work of what puny and meager industrial competitio­n the west in all its' former glory can still offer? 

Many people have said that this is looking to be the Chinese century, or at least, the Asian century, and I'm inclined to believe that they're right.