(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by 4ing (talk | contribs) at 20:29, 15 May 2015 (→‎Aldri tilbake@no.wikipedia: three blocked, 2 not socks, the rest likely or indetrminable (based on edit patterns)). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate>
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
    }}
    

    <translate> For example:</translate>

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
    }}
    
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Seskfabrega@hy.wikipedia

Inconclusive Inconclusive Only Seskfabrega has edited in the past three months, there is nothing for us to check further. No overlapping editing, so I don't see that there is an issue here. Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
billinghurst, You can write or confirm a list of participants - 1221nor (list)?--6AND5 (talk) 19:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser is not speculative. Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сыбыр@incubator.wikimedia

Not done Have you discussed this matter with the admins/crats at the wiki? They would generally be able to handle this without the intervention of stewards, at least at a first level of response. It does not seem evident what a checkuser would achieve, or demonstrated what is being done is contrary to policies for the wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mpb eu@bg.wikipedia

Results
  • For starters: White captain is Stale, can't be checked.
  • Technical evidence suggest that Mpb_eu is  Confirmed to AKSKubrat.
  • And as for McDile, I'd say Unrelated Unrelated.

Best regards, -- MarcoAurelio 21:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

À la 雞@zh-yue.wikipedia

Aldri tilbake@no.wikipedia

Thanks, I've blocked Karosserista, Puckbing and Pillarguris horn based on edit patterns. Herbjørn Skretting nad Kronny are definitely not socks. Of the rest, some are likely socks and some are indeterminable (based on edit patterns). I'll continue holding my eyes on them. Alltid tilbake and Åtselpelle seem to have unregistered edits from IP-addresses belonging to Kabel Deutschland Vertrieb und Service GmbH. - 4ing (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FreightXPress@wikidata

Note that I have included IP-80.134.90.212, as that is the most recent sock of this user and may be the only one that is not stale.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this is a cross-wiki case, and there may be stuff stored on CUwiki if I remember right: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobias Conradi. --Rschen7754 00:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per my CU in loginwiki and wikidata and based on previously stored information in CUwiki, FreightXPress is  Confirmed sock. He used mentioned ip as-well. no other sleeper account were found Mardetanha talk 18:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mardetanha: Fyi the "mentioned IP" is actually not an ip but a very confusing username he picked up. -- Bene* (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bene Thanks, indeed strange username, Per my Check again he is  Confirmed sock too, no other sleeper found again, as far as I checked he regularly uses constant ip range starting with 91, if nothing can't stop him you might block his range too Mardetanha talk 18:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock of anyone. "he often ends up in disagreement with other users" - since when is that relevant for CheckUser? Apart from that, Tamawashi looks like an abandoned account, what does that account has to do with me? Even if my account would be a secondary account of Tamawashi it would not fall under d:Wikidata:Alternate accounts#Illegitimate uses. As far as editing behavior is concerned, the edits where not anything near complex, nor is "immediately focused on ... classification questions" really surprising in a project that is centered around classification of things. Revealing information about IPs is breach of privacy.

Now, why am I blocked in Wikidata? I also would like to disclose that I had a disagreement with User:Bene*, the one that opened the case here. I understand that this is fine, but it has some extra smell.

Best regards. FreightXPress (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Shmakov@ru.wikibooks

See also