Steward requests/Checkuser/2011-04

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2011, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Lucas Celso@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Lucas Celso (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 201.51.248.57 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 201.29.2.208 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 201.51.212.205 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: O Clone, Cordel Encantado and other articles about soap operas.

Reason(s): This user often inserts many non-encyclopedic texts in articles about Rede Globo's soap operas. I think these texts are suspected of copyright violations. Please see these diffs: O Clone, by Lucas Celso, O Clone, by IP 201.29.2.208, O Clone by IP 201.51.248.57 and Cordel Encantado, by IP 201.51.212.205. Thanks. Francisco 23:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Unlikely as I see no connection among these users.--Jusjih 13:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

法度,法度网,Returnnnulll@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 法度 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 法度网 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Returnnnulll (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:頁面存廢討論/記錄/2011/04/13

Reason(s): spam UAL55 14:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed Ruslik 18:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

පසිඳු කාවින්ද@si.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: පසිඳු කාවින්ද (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); පසිදු කාවින්ද (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): User Page of already determined sock-puppet and blocked user පසිදු කාවින්ද and the User page of suspected user පසිඳු කාවින්ද are similar in nature. පසිදු කාවින්ද had been found sock-puppet as per this checkuser investigation. He had been blocked on 31st March 2011 at 0600h as per this. පසිඳු කාවින්ද had been created on 31st March 2011 at 10.34 as per this. This entry by another user in User talk page of පසිඳු කාවින්ද and his response points to the fact that both the previously determined & blocked user පසිදු කාවින්ද and suspected user පසිඳු කාවින්ද can be the same. As per this the speedy deletion of the user page of පසිදු කාවින්ද had been requested by පසිඳු කාවින්ද. The user names of both the previously blocked පසිදු කාවින්ද and suspected user පසිඳු කාවින්ද are similar. The editing behavior of both the users are similar. This contribution by suspected user and and this contribution by blocked user both involve heavy density of small edits and urge to increase the edit count. Please investigate these users. ශ්වෙත 17:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed Ruslik 17:55, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Maddox@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Maddox (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Fredxavier (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); FredXavir (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); JSSX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Please compare the four users.Veja they write the same way, edit the same way and ask the same block .Será they would be the same thing? That's what we'll find out. Thanks. --189.100.174.6 13:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

This request doens't provide any reasoning and was made by a banned sockpuppeter. Please, lock global accounts for ElectroStatic Jolt and Capitão Feiticeiro also consider adding this IP range to global black list, if possible. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 13:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Declined - no evidence provided that Maddox is related to any of these. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Luke7956@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: At7002 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.183.62 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.157.177 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.130.203 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.143.69 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Luke7956 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:WP:VIP#正在進行的破壞#luke7956

Reason(s): Both luke7956 & at7002 are trying to add contents with unreliable sources on zh:朱学恒、zh:新店救護車阻擋事件. Also, they make personal attacks towards other users who try to stop them, at the talkpage of the articles and users. & now Luke7956 may be using those IP addresses to keep on makeing personal attacks towards other users at zh:wp:VPM. This behavior is already considered as disruptive editing.Zhxy 519 13:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Inconclusive Ruslik 08:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Aontanna@th.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Status: Done

List of users: Aontanna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lubleaa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Khelang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:th:พูดคุย:จังหวัดอุตรดิตถ์

Reason(s): He (or she,I don't know) distort the content to distortion in fact and use puppet perverted. Mahatee 13:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed Lubleaa and Khelang are the same user.

Unrelated Aontanna is unrelated to two others. Ruslik 18:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much --Mahatee 04:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Августу@zh.wikipedia

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Status: Not done

List of users: Августу (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 72.229.35.176 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:user talk:72.229.35.176, Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress

Reason(s): user:Августу has admitted him/herself to be the said IP user and edited Chinese WP during the IP user's blocking due to 3RR. Both editors share the similar preference of article topic, i.e. Russian city. Sameboat 14:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

If the user admitted that they are this IP, checkuser is not needed. Ruslik 14:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

While I said s/he "admitted", this is not technically true. Literally the IP user used the name "user:Августу" to reply the discussion with the ip user. The other problem is that even though it is so obvious that this is the same person, admins in Chinese WP don't take any actions against the evasion of block. So I need concrete evidence to prove the prolonged block against Августу / 72.229.35.176 is legit. (I myself cannot explain this further in ZH WP because I was the one participated in the 3RR with 72.229.35.176 and is undergoing block.) -- Sameboat 15:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

CheckUsers won't generally link IPs to users anyway, per the privacy policy. Even if we ran this check, we could make no comment with regard to the IP. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

So there's no way to do with such evasion of block because the user starts editing anonymously, isn't it. -- Sameboat 15:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

(<-) Currently there is no need; if the IP misbehaves/does something bad, it can be blocked. When the block of the user is discusssed, a checkuser can be run to determine if the user edited since then, but without revealing IPs. --Eptalon 20:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The IP has already been blocked for 3RR, it's the user:Августу editing thru evasion without local admins performing any countermeasure (which I'm very sure they're aware of the situation but remain silent for reason unknown). -- Sameboat 01:01, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

VUGD@lv.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: VUGD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): We had one machiavellian user, who is now blocked. In previous checkuser it was revealed that bot account in this users name was his sockpuppet [1]. Which could be assumed to be an attack on this user, however this user is becoming an increasing pain and shares interest in astronomy with our bully. Just to be on the safe side, pelase check, if there isn't anything fishy about this account ~~Xil...(talk) 19:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Unlikely Ruslik 08:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks ~~Xil...(talk) 10:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Tudosobreatv@pt.wikipedia

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Status: Not done

List of users: Tudosobreatv (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Na tela da tv (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): These two users have very similar contributions, which go against the policies of verifiability in our wiki. The user might have created the two accounts to edit with one while the other is blocked. The name of the first means "All about tv" and the second means "on the tv screen". Roberto^diz-cont 19:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you give a pointer towards that policy? - To me, the user names do not look similar; also, as long as neither broke any other rules, I do not really see a reason for a checkuser here. We are not the inquisition, we do not do fishing trips either. --Eptalon 20:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

To clarify: as long as you cannot show that both edited an article in a short timespan (first one, then the other), there is no reason to do a CU here. Neither broke any rules. They may simply have similar interests. --Eptalon 20:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Não tinha visto que falas português. Pois bem, estes dois usuários descumprem, a cada edição, pt:WP:V, nossa política de verificabilidade, sendo alvos de inúmeros avisos e até mesmo bloqueios por causa disso. Na nossa língua, talvez os nomes pareçam mais similares, tanto na sonoridade quanto na escrita. Roberto^diz-cont 21:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

He don't speak portuguese Roberto. And violate WP:V is very common in a newbie. There are any reason to believe these 2 are the same person and are violating the CheckUser policy (i.e. evading a block, try to push a POV or something similar)? if there are show here the diffs. If there are not, as Eptalon said, there are no reason to check. Have similar (not that similar, anyway) usernames, per se, is not a reason to check anyone. Béria Lima ^msg 22:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done

CheckUser is not for fishing fr33kman 03:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Capitão Feiticeiro@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Capitão Feiticeiro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Capitão Pirata Bruxo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:CheckUser

Reason(s): Someone is using a nickname similar to me, but that's not me. And that someone is trolling and having disturbing behavior. I want to prove that I'm not "Capitão Feiticeiro". Capitão Pirata Bruxo^{Talk page} 00:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

And I´m not "Capitão Pirata Bruxo".--Capitão Feiticeiro 00:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Please compare Capitão Feiticeiro to ElectroStatic Jolt, who has been banned from Portuguese Wikipedia due to persitent vandalism (see block log). This account is editing on a request for comments created by ElectroStatic Jolt, with the same purposes and behavior, as you can see here. It has also assumed being a sockpuppet of ElectroStatic Jolt and it's also an obvious impersonator of Capitão Pirata Bruxo, a trusted user on ptwiki. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 01:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Relation between Capitão Feiticeiro and ElectroStatic Jolt

Confirmed, also pt:User:Samurai Feiticeiro is ElectroStatic Jolt. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^{talk [es]} 02:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Capitão Feiticeiro and Samurai Feiticeiro have been blocked. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 02:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

189.100.174.6: IP address used by ElectroStatic Jolt to evade block. Please, check for possible sleepers and inform if it is possible to apply some block on this IP range in order to prevent further evasions. Thanks in advance. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 13:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

No sleepers on this IP. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm NOT sockpuppet of electrostatic Jolt.Solicict unlock my imediatamente.Your's three managed to embarrass me and make me angry.--Capitão Feiticeiro 13:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Oceano Atlântico@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Oceano Atlântico (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tao Pai Pai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Criador de artigos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Please compare the three users. A case of block boundary. Heitor C. Jorge 07:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

+201.76.114.112. A probable block evasion with destructive editions. Thank you. Leandro Martinez msg 07:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed All three accounts are the same user. Jafeluv 07:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please, check also Laslopedia. It's a clear 'vandalism-only account' that edited the same articles edited by the above mentioned accounts (example: [2] [3]). I need this confirmation to reset the block of the master account according to local policy. Thanks.” T_ele^s (T_alk @ C G) 21:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Likely. Jafeluv 22:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Krokodillesko@no.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Krokodillesko (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Based on editpattern there is reason to believe this is a sockpuppet of no:bruker:sju hav, see also no:Kategori:Mistenkte sokkedukker for Sju hav, all accounts are blocked at nowiki. There may be more users than Krokodillesko. See also Checkuser on Arendal janitsjar Anne-Sophie Ofrim 10:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed

Spøkelse3

Drangedalsatelitten

are socks of Krokodillesko. Ruslik 12:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Tratra22395768,Chinaraileng38265@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Tratra22395768 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Chinaraileng38265 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Bus88MRT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); TRA&HSR&BUS&MRT&LRT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): These guys have moved many articles to his/her own userpage, see these records:[4],[5]. Sysop has confirmed that TRA&HSR&BUS&MRT&LRT is same as Bus88MRT.Tratra22395768 and Chinaraileng38265 is doing the same thing as Bus88MRT.--Noah's Ark 17:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed and also found and blocked; JustbeBPMF, and a couple of IP addys. Let me know if you want a full list/range of IPs being given so you can do long term local blocks. :-) fr33kman 18:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Human.gold,飞菇@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Human.gold (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 飞菇 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:UAA,w:zh:Wikipedia:頁面存廢討論/記錄/2011/04/14

Reason(s): see w:zh:User:飞菇,w:zh:User:Human.gold UAL55 13:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

They do not appear doing anything improper. Ruslik 08:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed A deeper investigation shows a good reason for CU to be done. The checkuser also found w:zh:User:偶菇. These geolocate to China and the USA. I've checked the USA IP address and found it is not an open proxy. This leads me to wonder if the account is being shared??? fr33kman 12:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

they are usernames for administrator attention.--UAL55 09:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

bd4703@ko.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: bd4703 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 100범 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Leno (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): user 100범 = Leno has many multi ID. and it blocked by ko.wiki to has many puppets and other reasons. I think the user bd4703 is 100범,Leno. because they have many feature. For example 100범,Leno aim communism and Nazzism. bd4703 act like communism and Nazzism such as 100범,Leno,bd4703 hate female person and male or female feminist. and 100범,Leno,bd4703 curse person who advise themselves to their acting. bd4703 is new user but I feel they are a same user and they have same characteristics.--여성부의 눈 11:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

these is proved by meta wiki on Feb 2011. 'puppets of Leno'

Less sure I am about the following names, but still likely enough to mention here:

Of the other names you provided, checkuser gives no information about Antinobba. And for History no. 1 and Backbeom, the checkuser comes out negative - no reason from the CU result to believe that they are among this sockpuppet group. - Andre Engels 00:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)]

--여성부의 눈 11:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Note: Reviewing this request. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 15:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I am the one 여성부의 눈 accused of using sockpuppets, and I strongly insist that there is no evidence at all to consider me as a follower of 'communism','Nazzism', nor that I 'hate female person and male or female feminist'. As you can see, my contribution to korean wikipedia ranges ONLY to (1) Republic of Korea Ministry of Gender Equality & Family (2)Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (3)Wilard van Orman Quine (4)Donald Davidson (5)Hilary Putnam(6)functionalism(philosophy), none of which might attract interest of a communist, Nazi, female-hater, anti-feminist!

(maybe Ministry of Gender Equality can be disputable, but I edited some items which seemed to me as biased, and claims indicating violation of neutrality pre-existed before 2-3 months ago when I signed in korean wikipedia)

I insist that the accuse of 여성부의 눈 is grounded on nothing. 여성부의 눈 is making use of inaccessibility of english wikipedia users, but anyone here can ask to a korean wikipedia adminstrator whether I am a communist, Nazi, female-hater or whatever. And as a matter of fact, the whole reason of the accuse is a personal-attack-grounded-on-none. Oh, I hope Checkuser procedure go really fast, so that every fact revealed, my innocence proved, ill-will of the personal attack identified.

And I hope my self-vindication does not violate any of the wikipedia regulation. If it does, then I seriously apologize for my thoughtlessness. Bye!--Bd4703 17:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Unlikely - Bd4703 has used two ip addresses, neither of which is from Leno's isp. - Andre Engels 17:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Luke7956@zh.wikipedia , once more

Status: Done

List of users: luke7956 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Protein wong (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); No same boat (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); AT7002 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.143.69 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.130.203 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.183.62 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.157.177 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.161.166 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 110.50.178.16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:WP:VIP#正在進行的破壞#luke7956

Reason(s): This user is keeping on making personal attacks towards other users at zh:wp:VPM and even their talkpages. This time there are more registered users can be seen here. --Zhxy 519 00:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Results

As follows:

Likely - No mention on the IP addresses but already blocked users «Luke7956», «Protein wong» and «No same boat» shares same IP range and other technical data.
I've also found: zh:User:不同舟, zh:User:島彥彤周 and zh:User:Rook201 [6] which are Likely to be Luke7956.
Among the list provided there are blocked users, but I did not checked for how long they are. Please check that yourselves.

-- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 09:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Tio Chiquinho@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Tio Chiquinho (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tao Pai Pai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Criador de artigos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Leandrinho777 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Soli Deo Gloria do Yahoo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Tio Chiquinho admitted it was sock Tao Pai Pai and another user.--187.37.104.35 20:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed the relationship between these accounts — I've also found Leandrinho777 which is

Confirmed to be related to the rest. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Please compared Soli Deo Gloria do Yahoo.It´s sock of Tao Pai Pai.--187.37.104.35 20:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

As a former checkuser, I can confirm that IP addresses on this range (187.37.*) point to a banned user from Portuguese Wikipedia: Lucas081094, involving a serious and persistent case of sockpuppetry and impersonation: see.

His editorial interests usually involve astronomy (as you can see through the names of some accounts: Planetas do Sistema Solar), television, soap operas and things regarding Rede Record.

Please, take a look at this request above again and verify if it's possible to block certain ranges in order to prevent further abuses.

Note: the range 189.100.* has also been used by this vandal. Since ElectroStatic Jolt (a banned vandal and impersonator: #Capitão Feiticeiro@pt.wikipedia) also has editorial interests regarding soap operas, television and Rede Record, include him on the check.

Thanks in advance. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 21:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed O Contribuidor as a sockpuppet of the banned vandal above. However, there has so far been only one IP, so no ranges are visible.

Confirmed (different IP range) Soli Deo Gloria do Yahoo = Biólogo Amador = Laslopedia (all blocked as far as I can see). One IP range is far too busy to consider a rangeblock but the other isn't so busy; I cannot share it publicly. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Likely «Ana Padula» = «Cassio Toledo» = «INMeditação» based on user agent strings. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

No,Peter.I`m NOT sockpuppet of ElectroStatic Jolt,Capitão Feiticeiro and Lucas081094.--187.37.104.35 13:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

O Satobador@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: O Satobador: (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); RodatobaS O (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Satobador:Capítulo Final (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); O Advogado do Sabotador (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Provable socks off local "saboteur".Some old nicks known: [7], pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos_a_administradores/Pedidos_de_bloqueio#Sabotador:_O_Cap.C3.ADtulo_Final, pt:Especial:Contribuições/Advogado_do_Sabotador. The first nick is a variation of Sabotador, while the second one, should be read from the end to the beginning. Alchimista 23:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed:

Sabotador: O Capítulo Final
O Satobador
RodatobaS O
T aoStradOb
Aquele que joga contra você

--PeterSymonds (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Please inclued Sabotador: O Capítulo Final and O Advogado do Sabotador.--187.37.104.35 12:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Unnecessary,

It looks like a duck to me.

-- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 13:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

201.59.229.194@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 201.59.229.194 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 200.164.174.243 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 189.17.120.10 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Please compare the three users anonymes. A case of block boundary. Article: São José de Mipibu. See historic. Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior 23:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

It is rather useless to check these IPs. You can simply semi-protect the article. Ruslik 06:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Article semi-protect. Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior 20:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiFarsa@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: WikiFarsa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 187.21.176.33 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 187.21.184.79 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): User Lmbassman (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)/Mlrm lmbassman (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser), blocked ad infinitum from ptwiki for illegal use of sockpuppets, has recently returned to the project using IPs (he himself admitted it). After the first IP he used was blocked for inappropriate behavior, he seems to have returned with another IP and a registered account, using the same bellicous stance and creating several topics to attack myself and the project. Since then the WikiFarsa account has been blocked for being inappropriate (no usernames with 'Wiki' on it are allowed in ptwiki), but I would like to confirm (despite being, to me, a clear case of WP:DUCK) that it is the same user. RafaAzevedo 17:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Stale - No check performed but Lmbassman does not edit since 2006 & Mlrm lmbassman neither, since 2007; so we can't confirm using this tool if they're or not sockpuppets. About WikiFarsa and those IPs: if the accounts and/or IPs are being used disruptivelly, I'd say to just block them. Regards, -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 18:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quintinense@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Quintinense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); FCPernambuco (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Edimilson Quebra-força (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 201.37.33.145 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): The user is a sockpuppet already locked in a wiki-pt.exe check on the same wiki.--187.24.59.148 19:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done - anonymous requests will not be processed. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 22:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Matheus Camcho@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Matheus Camcho (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Matheus Camacho (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): The user is likely that CPV.Matheus Camcho equals Matheus Camacho, with only one extra letter.--187.24.59.148 19:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Declined; no evidence of abuse from either account. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

189.31.89.222@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 189.31.89.222 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Polaco galeto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Probably sockpuppet.--187.24.69.2 15:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. Requests by IPs will not be processed.--Jusjih 16:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)