Steward requests/Checkuser/2013-06

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Requests

Oc Verder@sh.wikipedia

Possible Possible--Shizhao (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Xoser@diq.wikipedia

Hi. Can you please show evidence of edit warring and vandalism for the accounts listed above ? Some of them are really long-term contributors, some are even admins. There must be really good reasons to do such a thing, please read the checkuser policy. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Not done there is no such discussion about performing CU on all these accounts, which include an administrator's username. Please let the existing administrators compile a list, display it on your wiki then they can refer to that discussion from here. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Xoser writes in different languages.Xoser writes with a different alphabet.Individual acts Xoser founded an empire.preventing users can not afford.Xoser's Administrator rights would be canceled.Otherwise, the internal conflict experienced.Regards--Tarakayska (talk) 10:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Sokless@ko.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

  • 마그소쿠노
  • 남산골우물
  • 골반대왕
  • Wrote
  • Miniost
  • Sokless
  • Lacepagan

--Shizhao (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

multiple@es.wikinews

Possible Possible - Following user groups seems to be sharing the characteristics. I would recommend a community review based on there edits and make a decision.

Group 1

  • Stefanny conde
  • Alexandra zapata
  • Veco
  • Estefania sanmartin
  • Marielsol95
  • Genollina
  • Yady bella
  • Manuel rp

Group 2

  • Cristianedu
  • Janeth jimenez
  • Amor mioIOMC
  • Valazha
  • Ana ontaneda
  • Kattaty Vg
  • Michelle gaona

Group 3

  • GABY PINTA
  • Stefania quinche
  • Mariuxi ramirez ulloa
  • Rosario
  • Andrea tandazo

--Jyothis (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Spambots on Incubator

Completed Completed. Trijnsteltalk 12:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Spambots at mw.org

All properly locked up and IPs blocked. --თოგო (D) 18:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Spambots (NTSMR) at mw.org

All done. --თოგო (D) 18:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Spambot (NTSMR) at Wikidata

All done. Thx. --თოგო (D) 19:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Lia 2013@hy.wikipedia

I don't see what a CU request will resolve. If the accounts are editing against policy then block them, if they are not, then what is the issue. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
The issue is whether the community has to waste energy and time on easing a newcomer into constructive wiki editing, or whether ban all the accounts, as it was already extensively explained to the original account holder what's what in the wikipedia (blanket banning newbie accounts is not practiced at hy.wiki). ― Teak (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Regardless of the justification of this request, the data are Stale. They are only preserved for 3 months, and Parandjem's last action was in February, Paranjem's on 12 March, and Ազատ Հայրենիք only has the registration in January. --MF-W 23:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

More spambots on MediaWiki.org

Also (couldn't fit into the template):

--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Done: mostly by Snowolf. :) Thanks for reporting, Mathonius (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Another spambot on Wikidata

Done. I assume Snowolf has taken care of this request. Mathonius (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Xil@lv.wikipedia

Not done: no, sorry, but this is not the proper way to request a checkuser investigation: all you provide is a seemingly random list of accounts and unsubstantiated allegations of sockpuppet abuse. I see no reason to run a check on these users. Mathonius (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

D&S@pt.wiktionary

  • These are  Confirmed:
    • Noddy
    • Renova
    • Kaukáu
    • Solipsista
    • Jaquinzinho
    • Befa
    • Almotacé
    • Virissimo
    • GrandeSuro
    • Tasqueiro
    • Liberto
    • Tossan
    • João do Telhado
  • Likely Likely the same:
    • Stegop
  • Unlikely Unlikely
  • Mecanismo
  • Unrelated Unrelated
    • Pacostein (an admin on es.wiktionary)
    • VitorAzBine
    • LuisComaes

--MF-W 19:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Europefan@wikidata

No other accounts found. Actually not surprising, as the edits of the accounts on Wikidata only consist of adding interwiki links for the articles they created on enwiki; on the other hand there could have been sleepers (there are not).
I don't know (whether) this (is a) long-term abuser, but note that Special:CentralAuth/HeidelbergTurino is blocked on dewiki as a block evasion account of sulutil:Zombie433. --MF-W 18:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

중복세력@kowiki

Minjujuui and 과학 are the same user. 중복세력, 유체이탈영혼 and ㅁㅈㅎ seem to be Unrelated Unrelated --Melos (talk) 08:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Mirno@sh.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

  • Group1
    • Nekako
    • Kikič
    • Elgar
    • Kliš

Possible Possible:

  • Group1
  • Donac
  • Oc Verder

--Shizhao (talk) 06:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Eyingewers@fa.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

  • Eyingewers
  • Champtempi
  • Sunkiris
  • Riftscroon
  • Inanerush
  • Thugmerge
  • Lullypotty
  • Newersheen
  • Shedgolfs
  • Baleveld
  • Paulaoral
  • Vancelicks
  • Blimptubes
  • Croneedgar
  • Paeanbyes
  • Themtide
  • Detoxnacre
  • Bornerope
  • Spiketutus
  • Snotsjamie
  • Maifem
  • Jensbli
  • Saesgh
  • Guko4rwiser

Stale:

  • Espiral
  • بیکار
  • Elitp

--Shizhao (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

diq.wikipedia

P.S.: User:Ackdeals is the owner of those (User:Arde,User:Newos and others) sockpuppets which were blocked.--Gomada (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Mirzali, Miraz and Vate seem to be the same.
  • Ackdeals, Ereas, زازاندران are Likely Likely the same.
  • It's Possible Possible that Omid V. and Umut Akkoç are the same.
  • Tarakayska does not seem to be related to any one these. --MF-W 02:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Turque.garcon@fa.wikipedia

Sorry, would you like to know whether their IP addresses are related (this can be done by checkuser) or would you like to know anything else? (This can not be done, except for the user agents of the browers they use). --MF-W 16:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Actually I wanted you to check their user agents. But now that I think about it, it seems that check-user information on user agents are pretty limited and the probability of users having the same agents is high. So, maybe it was a bad request, sorry :) -- Dalba 4 Tir 1392/ 17:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Edgar Allan Poe@sh.project

Why is a checkuser investigation necessary in this case? Mathonius (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
For confirmation that Edgar Allan Poe=109.60.24.75 to avoid mistake if somebody else is claiming to be Edgar Allan Poe--Rjecina2 (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Does Edgar Allan Poe deny having used 109.60.24.75 to request an unblock? Mathonius (talk) 17:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
There is no need for checkuser anymore. Problem is solved. Sorry for taking your time--Rjecina2 (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I'm hereby closing this request as Not done. Mathonius (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Joel21@hewikivoyage

Dekel E (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Dekel E, why do you suspect Joel21 to be related to רוטר נט.? Mathonius (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
His edits similar to רוטר נט's edits. Dekel E (talk) 16:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you give an example? Which edits are similar and why? Mathonius (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Likely Likely--Shizhao (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)