(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

IT pros: We hate Microsoft

If we're to believe a study about the performance ratings IT pros give to vendors, Microsoft is in big trouble. The study just out from VendorRate gives Microsoft products across-the-board dreadful ratings for customer satisfaction, integrity, reliability, and more.

VendorRate conducted an online survey of IT pros of 347 hardware, software, telecom and service vendors during the second quarter of 2009, and only reported results for those vendors that received eight or more ratings. Microsoft's ratings for that quarter, in the words of Rick Schaefer, CEO of VendorRate, "simply fell off a cliff in this quarter."

The site asked for IT pros to rate vendors in 10 categories, including integrity, timeliness, communications, customer service, expertise, effectiveness, and whether they would recommend the vendor to others. It then added all the categories for each vendor to come up with a total.

For Microsoft, the ratings were universally dismal.Three different Microsoft businesses were given separate ratings, including operating systems, applications, and server/infrastructure.

Here's a brief summary of the findings, taken from the VendorRate summary:

IT pros rating vendors on VendorRate in April, May and June hammered Microsoft across the board with poor customer satisfaction scores for the companyโ€™s server and infrastructure software (55 out of 100, down nearly 17 percent), operating systems (67, down 9.5 percent) and applications (64, off nearly 18 percent).

Verizon was at the bottom of the barrel, with a 61 rating, followed by Sprint Nextel with 64, and Microsoft applications with 64. Microsoft operating systems was tied with AT&T Wireless for next worse with a 67. That means Microsoft took two of the bottom five spots. IBM Informix, meanwhile, took the top spot for vendors with a 96.

It's hard to know what to make of the survey, because there was no event or series of events that could have caused such a drastic plunge in a single quarter. But whatever the reason, Microsoft clearly has a lot riding on Windows 7, because if that operating system is a hit, you can expect all these numbers to rise.

Here's a summary of the report. If you want the full report, you'll have to register at the site for free in order to get it.

What People Are Saying

Integrity?

I'd be interested to see how people rated Microsoft's "integrity". As far as I can see, Microsoft doesn't have any integrity to be rated on.

Answers can be found in the most unlikely places.

"...because there was no event or series of events that could have caused such a drastic plunge..." You're right Preston, there wasn't any event. So, what does that leave?

So why do they stick with MS?

Simple, costs of moving and not trusting anything else. It's the devil they know!

+1 thumbs up

How come there isn't any voting on the comments attached to blog entries?

Probably because...

The ratings were making it way too easy for 'turfers to bury comments critical of the companies who can afford them.

IT pros: We hate Microsoft...oh the politics

The smell of politics is in that survey and that is the real shame. I work for a large international company with multiple offices in the U.S. and all over in the world and we have large data center in the U.S. The data center is 70% Microsoft servers and 30% Linux and we don't issues using MS products. All of our offices around the world are MS OS based and use MS Office and exchange and we are happy with MS including very much their support services. The ongoing knocking of Microsoft and the way it is carried out reminds me so much of the political nonsense we see in American politics rather than seeking what is true. Technology should not be that way.

...oh the politics

Nice comments. Problem though is that the article did not say there is 100% agreement in any of the areas questioned. You demonstrate the part that likes MS. The study showed only that more people than the last time they were surveyed dislike MS in one way or another.

I, too, work in an MS shop. We pay almost $60k per year for the privelege of getting help when we need it. Actually that was last year. This year we still pay the $60k but MS is now billing us by the minute for third level engineer support and when the $60k is gone they will not support anymore.

Today our net admins were working with them to fix a bug in their Exchange Server. A bug that MS programmed into it, not one we dumbly placed there. Twice the engineer commented we were using up a lot of minutes with little to show for it.

Our small shop is all MS but for our VoIP Call Managers which are Cisco Linux.

How do we feel about MS?

Nothing like you, that's for sure.

Interesting Poll

The problem with polls is that it's nearly effortless to engineer them to say precisely what you want them to say.

For my part, Microsoft has been good to me. When Novell essentially forfeited the LAN game to Microsoft, I switched. I have since enjoyed a lucrative career as a Microsoft platform administrator and engineer.

Conversely, IBM is a "filth word" in my shop. It has been ever since they bungled OS/2 Warp. People howl with glee at the spectacle Ballmer once made of himself on-stage: "DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!" But he had it right. Microsoft puts a great deal of focus on providing support to third-party developers for its platform. IBM couldn't be bothered. They took the funds that could have been used to support fledgling OS/2 Warp developers and sponsored a college bowl game instead. That obviously worked out well for them.

Novell didn't bungle the

Novell didn't bungle the LAN, and IBM didn't bungle OS/2 warp. They had their legs chopped out from under them by Microsoft. This is the reason Microsoft is a filth word to most people I know.

With all due respect,

With all due respect, Preston, so what?

People are dissatisfied with Microsoft...and, then what? Sure, some users will buy Macbooks and the Linuxtistas will whoop. But MS has its tentacles so tightly wrapped around the enterprise that most major users couldn't "kick the Redmond habit" despite their best efforts.

It's easy to complain. It's a lot harder to convince an executive board to shift from MS-based systems. For most computer users, all they've ever known is Windows, and the only inkling they've ever had that something might be rotten in Redmond is the Vista OS, which even MS themselves seem to have kicked to the curb.