Talk:Sarcoscypha dudleyi/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the current name for Peziza inaequalis?

Hasn't changed. Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then why isn't it linked? Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~What is an issue zero (ref. 14)?~~

Removed issue#

~~Why is the imperfect form listed as a synonym?~~

Removed. Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From a brief check, the article appears to be comprehensive. You haven't cited the paper on spore ontogeny that I remember looking at for some other Sarcoscypha, but I suppose it's a little esoteric. Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too. Thanks for reviewing! Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am now passing GA, with one small point left. Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]