Talk:Sarcoscypha dudleyi/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the current name for Peziza inaequalis?

Hasn't changed. Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then why isn't it linked? Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~What is an issue zero (ref. 14)?~~

Removed issue#

~~Why is the imperfect form listed as a synonym?~~

Removed. Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From a brief check, the article appears to be comprehensive. You haven't cited the paper on spore ontogeny that I remember looking at for some other Sarcoscypha, but I suppose it's a little esoteric. Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too. Thanks for reviewing! Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am now passing GA, with one small point left. Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]