This document discusses research philosophy and different philosophical schools of thought. It covers ontology, epistemology, and axiology. Ontology examines the nature of reality, whether social phenomena are objective or subjective. Epistemology studies the nature and sources of knowledge. Axiology assesses the role of values in research. Rationalism and empiricism are discussed as different views on the origins of knowledge. Positivism, realism, interpretivism, and pragmatism are presented as four common research philosophies. Positivism adheres to an objective, detached approach focused on facts and quantification.
Inductive and Deductive Approach to Research. Difference between Inductive an...Rohan Byanjankar
What is inductive and Deductive Approach to Research? The difference between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning to Research with clear example, figure and some major differences between them.
In this ppt you can find the materials regarding Significance of Research/Importance of Research
Subscribe to Vision Academy for Video assistance https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjzpit_cXjdnzER_165mIiw
Research can be classified as either basic or applied. Basic research seeks to expand knowledge and develop theories without necessarily solving immediate problems, while applied research tests theories and principles to solve practical problems. Applied research aims to improve areas like agricultural production, disease treatment, and energy efficiency. Examples of applied research topics include persuasion techniques and interventions for autism.
This document outlines the key differences between positivism and interpretivism research approaches. Positivism assumes objective social facts and influences on society, using quantitative data collection and aiming for objectivity. Interpretivism views reality as constructed by individual meanings and actions resulting from personal meanings rather than external forces, using qualitative data and focusing on subjective meaning. Positivism takes a macro approach seeking reliability through detached research, while interpretivism takes a micro approach developing rapport and emphasizing validity through unstructured interviews and observation.
Philosophy of Research By Zewde Alemayehu Tilahunzewde alemayehu
This document outlines Zewde Alemayehu's presentation on research philosophy and conceptual frameworks to students at Arba Minch University. It discusses key aspects of research philosophy, including that it involves a set of beliefs about how knowledge is developed and the nature of that knowledge. It also describes different philosophies or paradigms that can guide research, such as positivism, which focuses on objectively measuring empirical data, and phenomenology, which aims to understand meanings and contexts. The document emphasizes that researchers must determine their own philosophy to best match their topic and approach.
The document outlines key aspects of research methodology including:
1. The objectives of research such as defining problems, formulating hypotheses, collecting and evaluating data, making deductions, and testing conclusions.
2. The different types of research including descriptive, applied, quantitative, conceptual, empirical, qualitative, fundamental, and analytical research.
3. The methods of collecting data including primary methods like questionnaires, observations, interviews, and schedules and secondary methods of collecting published and unpublished data from various sources.
Research Methods vs Research MethodologySundar B N
This ppt elaborate Research Methods vs Research Methodology which covers Research Methods Versus Methodology, Research Methods, Research Methodology, Difference Between Research Methods and Methodology.
Subscribe to Vision Academy for Video assistance
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjzpit_cXjdnzER_165mIiw
Grounded Theory: A specific methodology developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967) for the purpose of building theory from data. In their book the term grounded theory is used in a more sense to denote theoretical constructs derived form qualitative analysis of data.
The document discusses the philosophy of positivism in social science research. Positivism traces its roots back to philosophers like Bacon and Descartes in the 17th century. It developed into a philosophy championed by Auguste Comte in the 19th century, which believes that scientific observation and experiment are the only ways to arrive at true knowledge. Positivism applies the scientific method to social sciences by focusing on quantifiable data that can be statistically analyzed to discover objective social truths and laws. The researcher takes an independent, objective role in this process.
Research is the systematic and objective analysis and recording of controlled observations that may lead to the development of generalizations, principles, or theories, resulting in prediction and possible control of events .
Theory guides research by shaping what researchers look at and how they make sense of data. It provides concepts and questions and suggests how to connect findings. Research also informs theory by testing it and potentially revising it. The relationship is dynamic, with theory and research informing each other in an ongoing process. Researchers use both deductive and inductive approaches, with deductive drawing on existing theory and inductive allowing theory to emerge from data analysis.
This document discusses research, including defining what research is, the key components of a research study, how to identify a research problem and gap, and how to eliminate a research gap. It notes that research involves searching again for new facts or modifying older ones. A well-defined research problem and hypothesis are essential, as are scientific techniques and logical interpretation of results. Identifying reasons for a research gap and characterizing it using a PICOS framework can help eliminate gaps. The document also discusses the importance of research ethics in promoting integrity and protecting human subjects.
This document discusses hypotheses, including:
1. A hypothesis is a prediction about possible outcomes of a study used to direct research. An example hypothesis predicts staff trained in change management will cope better with organizational changes.
2. Hypotheses should explain facts, direct relevant data collection, and prevent blind searches. They clarify research goals.
3. For a hypothesis to be good, it must be clear, testable, consistent with facts, and better than alternative hypotheses.
This document discusses different research philosophies and approaches. It defines key characteristics of research paradigms such as ontology, epistemology, and axiology. It presents the "research onion" as a model of the layers within research philosophy. The main research philosophies discussed are positivism, realism, interpretivism, and pragmatism. Positivism is defined as trying to uncover objective truths about how the world works through logical deduction and empirical observation in order to predict and control outcomes.
Ex post facto research examines how an independent variable that is already present affects a dependent variable, through a quasi-experimental study where participants are not randomly assigned. It involves 8 stages: defining the problem, stating hypotheses, selecting subjects, classifying data, gathering data where the outcome occurs and does not occur, comparing the data to infer causes, and analyzing findings. There are two approaches - starting with subjects differing on the independent variable or dependent variable. While it is useful when experiments are not possible, difficulties include not being able to establish causality or control all variables.
This document defines and describes different types of research. It discusses research purposes including exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory research. It also covers research uses in basic and applied contexts. The time dimension of cross-sectional and longitudinal research is outlined. Finally, it details quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques.
Research Meaning, Definition, Research Process, Types and MotivesRajaKrishnan M
This document discusses research methodology and was presented by S. Harithaa. It defines research as a systematic method for seeking answers to questions through data collection and analysis. The research process involves selecting a topic, reviewing literature, designing the study, collecting and analyzing data, interpreting results, and drawing conclusions. Research has objectives like exploring phenomena, producing new knowledge, making discoveries or policies, and testing hypotheses. It is undertaken for motives such as obtaining degrees, solving problems, gaining knowledge, or contributing to society. There are four main types of research: descriptive vs analytical, quantitative vs qualitative, conceptual vs empirical, and applied vs fundamental.
Research methodology is the systematic process of investigating a subject or problem to discover relevant information. It involves establishing a conceptual understanding or assessing facets of a problem through objective and systematic investigation. There are two main types of research: fundamental research which seeks to expand knowledge, and applied research which uses existing knowledge to solve problems. Research requires defining objectives, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting findings. It provides information to make evidence-based decisions.
Lecture Five Philisophy - Positivist .pptxMrDampha
This document discusses key philosophical concepts related to knowledge creation and research. It defines ontology as concerning what exists in reality, epistemology as how knowledge is acquired and the scope/methods of knowledge, axiology as the nature and ethics of values, and methodology as the principles of knowledge generation. The document notes that a researcher's philosophical perspectives, including their views on these concepts, shape how they approach research questions, design studies, and interpret results. It provides examples of objectivist and constructionist epistemologies and positivist vs. post-positivist paradigms to illustrate how philosophy influences the research process.
PARADIGM DEBATES IN EDUCATION RESEARCH BY MILKIYAS ASSO pptxMilkiyasAsso
1. The document discusses paradigm debates in educational research, outlining the key differences between positivist and interpretivist paradigms in terms of ontology, epistemology, methodology, axiology, and rhetoric.
2. It also examines four main epistemological positions - positivist, constructivist, transformative, and postcolonial indigenous. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research approaches are then compared based on their assumptions about the nature of reality, knowledge, values, and methodology.
3. In closing, the author expresses that their future philosophical position will be interpretivist/constructionist, as they believe realities are multiple and constructed through interaction and negotiation with others.
Logical Positivism held that the only meaningful knowledge is scientific knowledge that can be empirically verified. It rejected metaphysics and theology. Post-Positivism recognizes the limitations of Positivism in assuming objective truth and the fallibility of observation. Post-Positivism believes that while reality exists independently, our knowledge of it is imperfect and constructed based on fallible perceptions. The goal of science is to get closer to the truth about reality through revisable theories rather than uncover absolute truth.
Research is defined as a systematic, scientific investigation that follows a sequence of steps to establish facts and solve problems. The objectives of research are to gain familiarity with phenomena, accurately portray characteristics of individuals or groups, or test hypotheses about causal relationships. A research paradigm provides the philosophical framework for how a researcher views the world and their research. The key aspects of a paradigm are its ontology regarding the nature of reality, epistemology regarding what can be known, and methodology regarding how knowledge can be obtained. Different paradigms like positivism, interpretivism, and critical theory have distinct beliefs about these aspects.
The word psychology is derived from two Greek words “psyche” and “logos”.
Psyche means soul (life) and logos means knowledge (explanation) or the study of the soul.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF RESEARCH & ITS SPECIAL FEATURES (BRM)Osama Yousaf
The document outlines 7 key characteristics of the scientific method:
1. Empirical - concerned with observable realities through sensory experiences to generate knowledge.
2. Verifiable - observations are verified again to confirm or refute previous findings.
3. Cumulative - researchers build upon existing bodies of knowledge to advance understanding.
4. Deterministic - scientists seek to identify causal relationships and explain phenomena through logic rather than chance.
5. Ethical and ideological neutrality - conclusions must be objective and based on empirical data, not personal biases.
6. Statistical generalization - sampling aims for findings that generalize beyond specific settings.
7. Rationalism - explanations are logically reasoned through deductive and inductive logic rather
The document discusses different philosophies of science as they relate to nursing. It describes:
1) Analytic philosophy which focuses on logic and the scientific method to find a single truth, and continental philosophy which examines lived experiences and historical contexts to understand relationships.
2) The perceived view of continental philosophy which sees theories as value-laden and subjective rather than absolutely right or wrong.
3) A new emerging philosophy that synthesizes analytic and continental views using chaos and complexity science, seeing systems as interconnected and outcomes as unpredictable.
4) The importance for nurses to question their assumptions about science and understand how different philosophies aim to either control or understand patients.
The document discusses different philosophies of science as they relate to nursing. It describes analytic philosophy which focuses on logic and finding a single truth through the scientific method. Continental philosophy examines lived experiences and connections between ideas. Nursing incorporates aspects of both in examining concepts, theories, and how to best understand and care for patients. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of understanding different philosophies and constantly questioning assumptions to evolve as a nurse.
CHAPTER ONE & TWO LOGIC AND PHILOSOPHY.pptxBarentuShemsu
This document provides an introduction to philosophy by outlining some of its key concepts and fields. It begins by defining philosophy as the love of wisdom and noting that philosophy deals primarily with fundamental issues rather than having a single subject matter. The document then outlines some of philosophy's major fields, including metaphysics, epistemology, axiology, and logic. For each field, it provides brief definitions and examples of the types of questions addressed. The document emphasizes that philosophy is an activity that encourages critical examination and reflection on life and reality.
Philosophy is defined as the love of wisdom. It is the study of fundamental problems regarding existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Philosophy aims to understand and answer fundamental questions through rational analysis and criticism of beliefs. The main branches of philosophy are logic, metaphysics, epistemology, and value theory. Logic studies rules of reasoning. Metaphysics examines the nature of reality. Epistemology analyzes the origins, nature, and validity of knowledge. Value theory encompasses ethics, aesthetics, and social/political philosophy regarding morality, art, and society.
Research philosophy by zewde alemayehu tilahunzewde alemayehu
This document provides an overview of research philosophy presented by Zewde Alemayehu at Arba Minch University. It defines research philosophy and discusses key considerations in determining one's own research philosophy. Several philosophical paradigms and schools of thought in research are outlined, including positivism, phenomenology, pragmatism, and postmodernism. The differences between deductive and inductive reasoning approaches and between positivist and phenomenological paradigms are also summarized.
This document provides an outline of knowledge and discusses various topics related to epistemology. It begins by defining epistemology as the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge. It then discusses four main areas of debate in epistemology including the definition of knowledge, problems of skepticism, sources and scope of knowledge, and criteria for knowledge and justification. The document goes on to discuss related topics like metaphysics, meta-epistemology, genetic epistemology, constructivist epistemology, sources of knowledge, and theories of knowledge structure like foundationalism and coherentism.
A research paradigm is “the set of common beliefs and agreements shared between scientist. about how problems should be understood and addressed” (Kuhn, 1970)
This document discusses research philosophy and ethics. It begins by defining research as systematic investigations driven by curiosity to satisfy curiosity and discover new knowledge. Research has owners who discover new things and recipients who learn about the discoveries. The document then discusses research ethics, noting that research should pursue truth in an ethical manner. It outlines various philosophical approaches to research like idealism, realism, pragmatism, and existentialism. Overall, the document provides an overview of key concepts in research philosophy and ethics.
This document discusses different methods of philosophizing including phenomenology, existentialism, postmodernism, analytic tradition, logic, and critical thinking. It provides details on Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and its focus on consciousness and appearances. Existentialism is described as emphasizing individual choice and responsibility in the absence of certainty. Postmodernism rejects modernity and believes truth comes from non-rational elements of human nature. The analytic tradition examines how language shapes philosophical problems. Logic and critical thinking use tools like induction, deduction, and identifying fallacies. Common fallacies are also outlined.
Research Philosophy- Dr Ryan Thomas WilliamsRyan Williams
What is the nature of reality?
What is the nature of knowledge?
Unless you have studied philosophy you may not have considered these questions at any length
This document discusses different methods of philosophizing including phenomenology, existentialism, postmodernism, analytic tradition, logic, and critical thinking. It provides details on Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and its focus on consciousness and appearances. Existentialism is described as emphasizing individual choice and responsibility in the absence of certainty. Postmodernism rejects modernity and believes truth comes from non-rational elements of human nature. The analytic tradition examines how language shapes philosophical problems. Logic and critical thinking use tools like induction, deduction, and identifying fallacies. Common fallacies are also outlined.
How to Make a Field Storable in Odoo 17 - Odoo SlidesCeline George
Let’s discuss about how to make a field in Odoo model as a storable. For that, a module for College management has been created in which there is a model to store the the Student details.
Dr. Nasir Mustafa CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION "NEUROANATOMY"Dr. Nasir Mustafa
CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION
"NEUROANATOMY"
DURING THE JOINT ONLINE LECTURE SERIES HELD BY
KUTAISI UNIVERSITY (GEORGIA) AND ISTANBUL GELISIM UNIVERSITY (TURKEY)
FROM JUNE 10TH TO JUNE 14TH, 2024
The word “Gymnosperm” comes from the Greek words “gymnos”(naked) and “sperma”(seed), hence known as “Naked seeds.” Gymnosperms are the seed-producing plants, but unlike angiosperms, they produce seeds without fruits. These plants develop on the surface of scales or leaves, or at the end of stalks forming a cone-like structure.
This is an introduction to Google Productivity Tools for office and personal use in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on Saturday 13 and Sunday 14 July 2024. The PDF talks about various Google services like Google search, Google maps, Android OS, YouTube, and desktop applications.
Benchmarking Sustainability: Neurosciences and AI Tech Research in Macau - Ke...Alvaro Barbosa
In this talk we will review recent research work carried out at the University of Saint Joseph and its partners in Macao. The focus of this research is in application of Artificial Intelligence and neuro sensing technology in the development of new ways to engage with brands and consumers from a business and design perspective. In addition we will review how these technologies impact resilience and how the University benchmarks these results against global standards in Sustainable Development.
3. 1. Ontology
• Ontology and epistemology are two different ways of
viewing the research philosophy.
• Ontology can be defined as “the science or study of being”
and it deals with the nature of reality.
• Ontology is a system of belief that reflects an interpretation
of an individual about what constitutes a fact.
• In simple terms, ontology is associated with a central
question of whether social entities need to be perceived as
objective or subjective.
• Objectivism (or Positivism) and Subjectivism (or
Interpretivism or Constructivism) can be specified as two
important aspects of ontology.
4. Objectivism
• Objectivism (Positivism) “portrays the position
that social entities exist in reality external to
social actors concerned with their existence”.
• “is an ontological position that asserts that
social phenomena and their meanings have an
existence that is independent of social actors”.
5. Subjectivism
• Subjectivism (also known as constructionism or
interpretivism) perceives that social phenomena
is created from perceptions and consequent
actions of those social actors concerned with
their existence.
• Formally, constructionism can be defined as
“ontological position which asserts that social
phenomena and their meanings are continually
being accomplished by social actors”.
6. 2. Epistemology
• Epistemology as a branch of philosophy deals
with the sources of knowledge.
• Specifically, epistemology is concerned with
possibilities, nature, sources and limitations of
knowledge in the field of study.
• Epistemology can be branded as the study of
the criteria by which the researcher classifies
what does and does not constitute the
knowledge.
7. • Sources of knowledge related to business research in
particular can be divided into the following four categories:
• 1.Intuitive knowledge is based on intuition, faith, beliefs
etc. Human feelings plays greater role in intuitive
knowledge compared to reliance on facts.
• 2.Authoritarian knowledge relies on information that has
been obtained from books, research papers, experts,
supreme powers etc.
• 3.Logical knowledge is a creation of new knowledge
through the application of logical reasoning.
• 4.Empirical knowledge relies on objective facts that have
been established and can be demonstrated.
8. • Research process may integrate all of these
sources of knowledge within a single study. For
example, intuitive knowledge can be used in
order to select a specific problem to be explored
within a selected research area, whereas
authoritative knowledge is gained during the
process of literature review. Moreover, logical
knowledge is generated as a result of analysing
primary data findings, and conclusions of the
research can be perceived as empirical
knowledge
9. • Epistemology has many branches and include
essentialism, historical perspective,
perennialsm, progressivism, empiricism,
idealism, rationalism, constructivism and
others.
• Empiricism and rationalism can be specified as
the two major constructing debates within the
field of epistemological study that relates to
business studies.
10. Rationalism versus Empiricism
• The dispute between rationalism and empiricism
concerns the extent to which we are dependent
upon sense experience in our effort to gain
knowledge.
• Rationalists claim that there are significant ways
in which our concepts and knowledge are gained
independently of sense experience.
• Empiricists claim that sense experience & sensory
perception (5 senses) is the ultimate source of all
our concepts and knowledge.
11. • Rationalists generally develop their view in two
ways:
• First, they argue that there are cases where the
content of our concepts or knowledge outstrips
the information that sense experience can
provide.
• Second, they construct accounts of how reason in
some form or other provides that additional
information about the world.
• Empiricists attack the rationalists' accounts of
how reason is a source of concepts or knowledge
12. Empiricism
• Empiricism, in philosophy, the view that all
concepts originate in experience, that all concepts
are about or applicable to things that can be
experienced, or that all rationally acceptable
beliefs or propositions are justifiable or knowable
only through experience.
• This broad definition accords with the derivation
of the term empiricism from the ancient Greek
word empeiria, “experience.”
13. A posteriori vs. A priori
• Concepts are said to be “a posteriori” (Latin: “from the
latter”) if they can be applied only on the basis of
experience,
• Concepts are called “a priori” (“from the former”) if they
can be applied independently of experience.
• Beliefs or propositions are said to be a posteriori if they are
knowable only on the basis of experience and a priori if
they are knowable independently of experience.
• Empiricism: the view that all concepts, or all rationally
acceptable beliefs or propositions, are ‘a posteriori’
• Rationalism: all concepts, or all rationally acceptable beliefs
are ‘a priori’
14. Rationalism
• In epistemology, rationalism is the view that
"regards reason as the chief source and test of
knowledge" or "any view appealing to reason
as a source of knowledge or justification".
• Rationalism is defined as a methodology or a
theory in which the criterion of the truth is
not sensory but intellectual and deductive.
15. ‘I think therefore I exist’ (Descartes)
• Rationalists believed that reality has an intrinsically logical
structure.
• Rationalists argue that certain truths exist and that the
intellect can directly grasp these truths.
• Rationalists asserted that certain rational principles exist in
logic, mathematics, ethics, and metaphysics that are
fundamentally true
• The rationalists had such a high confidence in reason that
empirical proof and physical evidence were regarded as
unnecessary to ascertain certain truths
• There are significant ways in which our concepts and
knowledge are gained independently of sense experience
16. Axiology
• Axiology is a branch of philosophy that studies
judgements about the value.
• Specifically, axiology is engaged with assessment
of the role of researcher’s own value on all
stages of the research process.
• Axiology primarily refers to the ‘aims’ of the
research.
• This branch of the research philosophy attempts
to clarify if you are trying to explain or predict the
world, or are you only seeking to understand it.
17. • Axiology of research philosophies and relevant
data collection techniques.
• When discussing axiology aspect of the
research philosophy in your qualitative
research, you need to make your values
known in the study and reports your values
and biases as well as the value-laden nature of
information gathered from the field.
19. Positivism
• Positivistic approaches to research are based on research methodologies
commonly used in science.
• They are characterised by a detached approach to research that seeks out
the facts or causes of any social phenomena in a systematic way.
• Positivistic approaches are founded on a belief that the study of human
behavior should be conducted in the same way as studies conducted in
the natural sciences (Collis & Hussey, 2003, p.52).
• Positivistic approaches seek to identify, measure and evaluate any
phenomena and to provide rational explanation for it.
• This explanation will attempt to establish causal links and relationships
between the different elements (or variables) of the subject and relate
them to a particular theory or practice.
• There is a belief that people do respond to stimulus or forces, rules
(norms) external to themselves and that these can be discovered,
identified and described using rational, systematic and deductive
processes
20. • As a philosophy, positivism adheres to the view that only “factual”
knowledge gained through observation (the senses), including
measurement, is trustworthy.
• In positivism studies the role of the researcher is limited to data
collection and interpretation through objective approach and the
research findings are usually observable and quantifiable.
• Positivism depends on quantifiable observations that lead
themselves to statistical analysis. It has been noted that “as a
philosophy, positivism is in accordance with the empiricist view that
knowledge stems from human experience. It has an atomistic,
ontological view of the world as comprising discrete, observable
elements and events that interact in an observable, determined and
regular manner”
21. • In positivism studies the researcher is
independent from the study and there are no
provisions for human interests within the study.
• Positivist studies usually adopt deductive
approach, whereas inductive research approach
is usually associated with a phenomenology
philosophy.
• Positivism relates to the viewpoint that
researcher needs to concentrate on facts,
whereas phenomenology concentrates on the
meaning and has provision for human interest.
22. • Researchers warn that “if you assume a positivist
approach to your study, then it is your belief that
you are independent of your research and your
research can be purely objective. Independent
means that you maintain minimal interaction
with your research participants when carrying
out your research.”
• In other words, studies with positivist paradigm
are based purely on facts and consider the world
to be external and objective.
23. • The five main principles of positivism philosophy can be summarized as
the following:
1. There are no differences in the logic of inquiry across sciences.
2. The research should aim to explain and predict.
3. Research should be empirically observable via human senses. Inductive
reasoning should be used to develop statements (hypotheses) to be tested
during the research process.
4. Science is not the same as the common sense. The common sense should
not be allowed to bias the research findings.
5. Science must be value-free and it should be judged only by logic.
24. Positivism as an epistemology is associated with the following set of
disadvantages:
• Firstly, positivism relies on experience as a valid source of
knowledge. However, a wide range of basic and important concepts
such as cause, time and space are not based on experience.
• Secondly, positivism assumes that all types of processes can be
perceived as a certain variation of actions of individuals or
relationships between individuals.
• Thirdly, adoption of positivism in business studies and other studies
can be criticized for reliance to status quo. In other words, research
findings in positivism studies are only descriptive, thus they lack
insight into in-depth issues.
25. Realism
• Realism research philosophy relies on the idea
of independence of reality from the human
mind.
• As a branch of epistemology, this philosophy is
based on the assumption of a scientific
approach to the development of knowledge
• Direct and Critical Realism
26. • Direct realism can be described as “what you see
is what you get”. In other words, direct realism
portrays the world through personal human
senses.
• Critical realism, on the other hand, argues that
humans do experience the sensations and images
of the real world. According to critical realism,
sensations and images of the real world can be
deceptive and they usually do not portray the
real world.
27. • Direct realists accept the world as relatively unchanging. They
concentrate on only one level only be it individual, group or an
organization.
• Critical realists, on the other hand appreciate the importance of
multi-level study. Specifically, as a researcher following critical
realism research philosophy you have to appreciate the influence
and interrelationship between the individual , the group and the
organization.
• There is a consensus among researchers that critical realist is more
popular and appropriate than direct realist approach due to its
ability to capture the fuller picture when studying a phenomenon.
Accordingly, if you have chosen realism as your research philosophy
you are advised to assume the role of critical realist, rather than
direct realist.
28. Interpretivism
• Interpretivism, also known as interpretivist involves
researchers to interpret elements of the study, thus
interpretivism integrates human interest into a study.
• Accordingly, “interpretive researchers assume that
access to reality (given or socially constructed) is only
through social constructions such as language,
consciousness, shared meanings, and instruments”.
• Development of interpretivism philosophy is based on
the critique of positivism in social sciences
29. • Interpretivism is “associated with the philosophical
position of idealism, and is used to group together
diverse approaches, including social constructivism,
phenomenology and hermeneutics; approaches that
reject the objectivist view that meaning resides within
the world independently of consciousness”.
• According to interpretivist approach, it is important for
the researcher as a social actor to appreciate
differences between people.
• Interpretivism studies usually focus on meaning and
may employ multiple methods in order to reflect
different aspects of the issue
30. • Interpretivist approach is based on naturalistic
approach of data collection such as interviews
and observations. Secondary data research is
also popular with interpretivism philosophy. In
this type of studies, meanings emerge usually
towards the end of the research process.
31. • The most noteworthy variations of interpretivism include
the following:
• Hermeneutics refers to the philosophy of interpretation
and understanding. Hermeneutics mainly focuses on
biblical texts and wisdom literature and as such, has a little
relevance to business studies.
• Phenomenology is “the philosophical tradition that seeks
to understand the world through directly experiencing the
phenomena”.
• Symbolic interactionism accepts symbols as culturally
derived social objects having shared meanings. According
to symbolic interactionism symbols provide the means by
which reality is constructed
32. • In general interpretivist approach is based on the
following beliefs:
1. Relativist ontology. This approach perceives
reality as inter subjectively that is based on
meanings and understandings on social and
experiential levels.
2. Transactional or subjectivist epistemology.
According to this approach, people cannot be
separated from their knowledge; therefore there is
a clear link between the researcher and research
subject
33. Pizam and Mansfeld (2009)
Assumptions Positivism Interpretivism
Nature of Reality Objective, tangible, single Socially constructed,
multiple
Goal of Research Explanation, Strong
Prediction
Understanding, Weak
Prediction
Focus of Interest What is general, average
and representative
What is specific, unique
and deviant
34. Disadvantages & Advantages
• Main disadvantages associated with interpretivism relate to
subjective nature of this approach and great room for bias on
behalf of researcher.
• Primary data generated in interpretivist studies cannot be
generalized since data is heavily impacted by personal viewpoint
and values. Therefore, reliability and representativeness of data is
undermined to a certain extent as well.
• On the positive side, thanks to adoption of interpretivism,
qualitative research areas such as cross-cultural differences in
organizations, issues of ethics, leadership and analysis of factors
impacting leadership etc. can be studied in a great level of depth.
• Primary data generated via Interpretivism studies might be
associated with a high level of validity because data in such studies
tends to be trustworthy and honest.
35. • Generally, if you are following interpretivism research philosophy in
your dissertation the depth of discussion of research philosophy
depends on the level of your studies. For a dissertation at
Bachelor’s level it suffices to specify that you are following
Interpretivism approach and to describe the essence of this
approach in a short paragraph. For a dissertation at Master’s level
discussion needs to be expanded into 2-3 paragraphs to include
justification of your choice for interpretivist approach.
• At a PhD level, on the other hand, discussion of research philosophy
can cover several pages and you are expected to discuss the
essence of interpretivism by referring to several relevant secondary
data sources. Your justification for the selection of interpretivism
need to be offered in a succinct way in about two paragraphs…
36. Constructivism
• Constructivism is the recognition that reality is a
product of human intelligence interacting with
experience in the real world.
• As soon as you include human mental activity in the
process of knowing reality, you have accepted
constructivism” Davis Elkind
• Constructivism accepts reality as a construct of human
mind, therefore reality is perceived to be subjective.
• This philosophical approach is closely associated with
pragmatism and relativism.
37. • Positivism argues that knowledge is generated
in a scientific method
• Constructivism maintains that knowledge is
constructed by scientists and it opposes the
idea that there is a single methodology to
generate knowledge
38. Social Constructivism
• Social constructivism is a sociological theory of
knowledge according to which human development is
socially situated and knowledge is constructed through
interaction with others.
• The phrase was coined by Peter L. Berger and Thomas
Luckmann in The Social Construction of Reality.
• Based on a combination of Alfred Schutz' Sociology of
Knowledge and Durkheim's concept of institutions,
their theory aims to answer the question of how
subjective meaning becomes a social fact.
39. • Social constructivism focuses on an
individual's learning that takes place because
of his or her interactions in a group.
• A person's cognitive development will also be
influenced by the culture that he or she is
involved in, such as the language, history and
social context
40. • 'Strong' social constructivism as a
philosophical approach tends to suggest that
"the natural world has a small or non-existent
role in the construction of scientific
knowledge".
41. • Constructivist philosophy stressing the importance of
interactions in the construction of knowledge.
• Each of us is shaped by our experiences and interactions.
Each new experience or interaction shapes our
perspectives and behavior.
• Social constructivism extends constructivism into social
settings, wherein groups construct knowledge for one
another, collaboratively creating a small culture of shared
artifacts with shared meanings.
• Social constructivism is a theory of knowledge and learning
which contends that categories of knowledge and reality
are actively created by social relationships and interactions.
42. Pragmatism
• Pragmatism research philosophy accepts
concepts to be relevant only if they support
action.
• Pragmatics “recognize that there are many
different ways of interpreting the world and
undertaking research, that no single point of
view can ever give the entire picture and that
there may be multiple realities”.
43. • According to pragmatism research philosophy,
research question is the most important
determinant of the research philosophy.
• Pragmatics can combine both, positivist and
interpretivism positions within the scope of a
single research according to the nature of the
research question
45. Deductive versus Inductive
• Deductive reasoning starts with a general
theory, statement, or hypothesis and then
works its way down to a conclusion based on
evidence.
• Inductive reasoning starts with a small
observation or question and works it’s way to
a theory or understanding or exploration by
examining the related issues
46. Phenomenology
• Phenomenological approach is research from the
perspective that human behavior is not as easily
measured as phenomena in the natural sciences.
• Human motivation is shaped by factors that are
not always observable, e.g. inner thought
processes, so that it can become hard to
generalize on, for example, motivation from
observation of behavior alone.
• Furthermore, people place their own meanings
on events; meanings that do not always coincide
with the way others have interpreted them.
47. • Phenomenology in business research studies
ideas are generated from rich amount of data by
the means of induction and human interests, as
well as stakeholder perspective may have their
reflection on the study.
• A study that attempts to assess the impact of
leadership style on employee motivation in an
organization via conducting in-depth interviews
with employees is a relevant example for
research with a phenomenology philosophy.
48. • Advantages associated with phenomenology
include better understanding of meanings
attached by people and its contribution to the
development of new theories.
• Its disadvantages include difficulties with
analysis and interpretation, usually lower
levels of validity and reliability compared to
positivism, and more time and other
resources required for data collection.
49. Phenomenology:Adv vs disadv
1. Can look at change
processes over time
1.Data gathering can take up a
great deal of time and
resources
2. Help to understand
people’s meanings
2.The analysis and
interpretation of data may be
difficult
3. Help to adjust to new
issues and ideas as they
emerge
3.May be harder than
positivist approach to control
pace, progress and end points
4. Contribute to the
development of new
theories
4.Policy-makers may give low
credibility to a
phenomenological study
5. Gather data which is seen
as natural rather than
artificial
50. Positivism: Adv vs disadv
1.Wide coverage of the
range of situations
1.Methods tend to be flexible
and artificial
2.Can be fast and
economical
2.Not very effective in
understanding processes or
the significance people attach
to actions
3.May be relevant to policy
decisions when statistics are
exaggerated in large
samples
3.Not very helpful in
generating theories
4.Because it focuses on what
is or what has been recently, it
makes it hard for policy
makers to infer what actions
should take place in the future
51. Hypothesis
• A proposition made as a basis for reasoning,
without any assumption of its truth
(ex: the hypothesis that every event has a cause)
52. Variable
• Variable is an element, feature or factor that is liable to
vary or change
• A characteristic, number, or quantity that increases or
decreases over time, or take different values in
different situations
• Two basic types are:
1. Independent variable: that can take different values
and can cause corresponding changes in other
variables
2. Dependent variable: that can take different values
only in response to an independent variable
53. Research
philosophy
Epistemology: the researcher’s view
regarding what constitutes acceptable
knowledge
Pragmatism
Either or both observable phenomena and subjective
meanings can provide acceptable knowledge dependent
upon the research question.
Focus on practical applied research, integrating different
perspectives to help interpret the data
Positivism
Only observable phenomena can provide credible data,
facts.
Focus on causality and law-like generalizations, reducing
phenomena to simplest elements
Realism
Observable phenomena provide credible data, facts.
Insufficient data means inaccuracies in sensations (direct
realism). Alternatively,
phenomena create sensations which are open to
misinterpretation (critical realism).
Focus on explaining within a context or contexts
Interpretivism
Subjective meanings and social phenomena.
Focus upon the details of situation, a reality behind these
details, subjective meanings motivating actions