(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

Grants:PEG/MADe - WM BE/WLM BeLux 2013/Report

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by MADe (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 23 October 2013 (change in status). It may differ significantly from the current version.


Draft report
This is a draft of an interim grant report for a grant funded is fiscal year Pending. Please do not respond or comment on it just yet
it's not yet ready for review. To read the approved grant submission, please visit Grants:PEG/MADe - WM BE.


Compliance and completion

Are you complying with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
YES
Do you expect this project to be completed by the date specified in the approved grant submission?
YES
Did you use any of the grant funds?
YES
Was this interim report requested by WMF?
NO

Activities and lessons learned

This section describes what the grantee did, and what the grantee learned from implementing the project. This section should be useful to others implementing similar projects and is an opportunity for the grantee to reflect on the project's performance.

Activities

Sept 7, Brussels kick off meeting
Sept 23, Antwerp meeting
Sept 28, Gent upload marathon
Sept 30, 'Last Participation Day': Bribing possible contestants with not just a beer. Only in Belgium!
Oct 22, final judging session
Sat June 29 - preparatory meeting
Discussion on the steps forward with the project team. Meeting the volunteers. It was combined with the WWI edit-a-thon.
Wed July 17 - meeting KIK-IRPA
Discussing this years approach: venue, reception & drinks. Determining possible dates for the award session.
Wed August 14 - Social Media
Set up of the WikiLoveMonuments.be Twitter account. Main updates on the website.
Thurs August 22 - meeting Herita (Antwerpen)
Meeting Herita (heritage organisation), possible future sponsors. Preparing press reports
Sat September 7 - kick-off meeting
Meeting new contributors, explaining the rules, sharing tips and tricks. Meeting at the Halles Saint-Géry, Brussels. Meet fellow contestants, hear tips and tricks from people who participated last year. Learn how to upload and process the images. The event was no succes, no new contributors showed up, so we refocused on the more experienced contributores. We also discussed the steps toward a Belgian chapter.
Sat September 28 - upload marathon
Meeting in Gent. We explored the historical inner city of Ghent, en took additional pictures. We met and exchanged experiences. WM BE was discussed, too. The meeting resulted in a serious spike in uploads.
Mon September 30 - last participation day
Online rally to convince people to upload their last and best images.
Sun October 3 - Judging information session
Prepare the online voting system. Explain the system and how the judges should cast their votes.
Tues October 22 - Final judging session
Meeting in Ghent with judges. Final selection of images. Slight adaptations to the pictures. Preparations for the press communiqué
Tues October 23 - Press release
Practical preparations. Communication with winners. Press release, and contact with press contacts

Lessons learned

What lessons were learned that may help others succeed in similar projects, or that may change the way you are doing this project?
What went well, or is going well?
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
What did not go well, or is not going well?
  • Our communication is shattered over multiple ways of communication and social media: website, email, Twitter, private messages on Commons, ... We lacked feedback on the communication. In the organisation of other WLMs, eg. in South Africa, we noticed that Facebook would be a better approach. We will use Facebook in future editions.

Project goal and measures of success

This section should reference the project goals and measures of success described in the approved grant submission. See Grants:PEG/MADe - WM BE/WLM BeLux 2013 to review the goals and metrics listed in the approved submission.

Project goal

Provide the project goal here.
We want to encourage and facilitate the capturing and uploading of photographs of Belgian and Luxembourg heritage sites or monuments in September (goal I). On an organisatorial level, we want to strengthen our organisation (goal IIa), achieve a high media coverage (goal IIb) and anchor our relationship with the different collaborating organisations (goal IIc).

Measures of success

List the measures of success exactly as provided in the approved grant submission, and evaluate your project according to each measure listed there. Answer only for measures on which you are currently able to report since your project has not been completed.
  • 10,000 uploads We collected 3531 images. We need to investigate further. Belgian has no "Freedom of Panorama" law, and we noticed that several hundreds of images were removed during the competition. This includes all images of the Atomium.
  • 40 new contributors 143 contributors participated in the Belgian or Luxembourg event, of which 62 participated for the first time, and 49 new users. 61 persons where recurring contributors that participated in earlier editions of WLM.
  • high 'diversity' We got a diverse set of images:
    • Firstly geographically: a map overview of the pictured monuments shows a nice distribution over all the provinces.
    • Secondly, on the languages partipating: we went the extra mile to make sure that both Dutch, French or German speaking people would participate to the competition. Our website is four lingual (NL, FR, DE, EN) and we posted multilingual Twitter messages. This resulted in a high participation grade in all language communities. We noticed the attendance of non-Belgians (non-Europeans) at the events
    • Thirdly, we saw a good distribution between small uploaders and busy uploaders (95 uploaders with <10 images, 37 with <100 images, and 5 with > 100 images)
  • professional volunteering team For me personally (MADe), this is the biggest difference with the events in 2011 and '12. I felt the presence of a team of people that helped me during the events.
  • media impact
  • organisational commitments To be finished during the award session
Provide an overall assessment of how your project is going according to these measures.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
While doing this project, have you decided to track any other measures of success not listed in your grant submission? If so, please list them here.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Impact

Remember that you will need to report on your project's impact on WMF's mission and strategic goals in your final report.

Reporting and documentation of expenditures

This section describes the grant's use of funds

Documentation

Remember that you will need to send receipts or documentation of all project expenses to WMF at the time your final report is submitted.

Expenses

Please list all project expenses in a table here, with descriptions and dates. Review the instructions here here.
This list is as of October 3. It includes all made costs. Costs borne by external parties are not included in the overview, as with future phases (judging, award session).
Description costs requested
from WMF (EUR)
Actuals (EUR)
Part 1: July meeting of the project volunteers
Travel expenses 180 172,64
Part 2: September start-up meeting
Travel expenses 120 163
Part 5: General costs
Cellphone expenses 100 23,89
Project Management Costs 1750 1000
Postal Costs (not foreseen) 0 10,25
Total
5180 4340 EUR 1369,78 EUR


Total amount budgeted (with currency)
4340 EUR
Total amount spent (with currency)
1369,78 EUR
Based on your spending, will you need to request any changes to your budget? If you do, please see the guidelines for requesting changes to your budget.
NO

Expenses

List of all expenses will be shared on project finalisation.