Steward requests/Permissions/2024-02

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Gadarawamo@guwwiki

Status:    Done

I am requesting admin access to carry out maintenance work. Gadarawamo (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --❄️Mykola❄️ 10:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

李瞬生@lzhwiki

Status:    Done

My rights will soon expire. Ask for approval to extend the term, thanks. The vote has ended with 4 supports. --李瞬生 (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Comment Non-steward comment @李瞬生: I'm assuming you are requesting a renewal of your rights, and not a removal of access? If so, this should be placed under the section "Administrator access". Now done by user. EPIC (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done @李瞬生: First of all the local request started on 25 January and you should wait a week before posting here.
Also, the flag will expire on 25 February, so I suggest you open a new local request on 17 February, and then ask for the flag here on 24 February, otherwise your flag will be assigned starting from the current date (and, if you prefer this case, just post here again starting 1 February - 7 days of discussion). Thanks for your understanding --Superpes15 (talk) 18:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Good day. Thank you for your reply, because I will be very busy in February. To prevent forgetting, I will apply again in a few days. 李瞬生 (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
@李瞬生: So, no problem, the request is not too old and you can keep this one (we can consider it valid if it isn’t so hold) :) Just post here again! Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 10:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15: Now I am applying again. --李瞬生 (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Mah3110

Status:    Done

I am one of the top contributor to the Fon Wikipedia and admin in incubator when the project were still there. Now that the project is launched, need admin rights for some maintenance work. Thanks

Mah3110 (talk) 09:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 11:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Erick Soares3@ptwikisource

Status:    Done

Thanks! ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 02:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 18:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

ร้อยตรี โชคดี@th.wikibooks

Status:    Done

Dear Sir, Please consider renewing the administratorship of Thai Wikibooks for User:ร้อยตรี โชคดี, as he was an administrator on the project before. And he is happy to continue serving as administrator for this project. Best regards --B20180 (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --❄️Mykola❄️ 09:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Nehaoua@arwiktionary

Status:    Done

This is the second candidacy for my colleague @Nehaoua:, after a good period with adminship rights, he is now looking to extend his permissions. الناجم العاجم (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2026-02-11. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

RG72@eowiktionary

Status:    Not done

Hello! I have been working for Esperanto-Wiktionary since 2014, having created a number of articles like [1], [2], [3] and major lists like [4], [5] and I believe that this important project needs an administrator, which it has not had for many years.

I announced my candidacy on November 12 and have since received 10 votes in favor (one was later withdrawn due to a smear campaign launched by former administrator Taylor79, who was deprived of this status by decision of the stewards due to endless conflicts and arbitrariness), 4 votes against. For this reason, please, promote me to administrator position.RG72 (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

 On hold Per removal request below. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Note that I checked this project a lot in the last 2 years and I didn't notice a lot of active users there! Some of voters never edited there. Is there an explanation for this (like notifying them on social or on another projects)? Thanks. Superpes15 (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Not done Other request was closed with removal. -- Amanda (she/her) 06:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
@AmandaNP: just a heads up, the removal request was for eowiki, but this adminship request is for eowiktionary. EPIC (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, struck and still up for consideration. -- Amanda (she/her) 07:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
I think the project is not yet ready to have a local sysop. I see this election with a lot of votes made by users who aren't active here (and are from eowiki). Stewards removed the local sysops on eowikt after quarrels and abuse between two administrators some years ago and, since that, I've always observed the project while also performing ordinary maintenance actions (the two formers sysops continued to argue also using heavy insults between each other). I don't think it's a very good idea to give the flag to a third user who hasn't really been active in the project for a long time and immediately after their deflag on eowiki! Thanks
P.S. Note that the support votes are 9 and not 10 (although, coming from users who are not very active there, I couldn't define their value). Superpes15 (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Do you still need a hold here? I'm ready to not-done this. — xaosflux Talk 11:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Off-topic
Comment Comment @RG72: Please don't attack other users when applying for adminship. @Stewards: Please note the vote stacking. Also, RG72 applied for adminship for a special purpose: to ban me due to personal hate. wiki wiktionary Please see also Steward_requests/Miscellaneous#Please_help_to_remedy_piracy_and_harassment. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Comment Comment Can anyone stop this? I think everyone is already tired of this endless stream of accusations and paranoid fears. This is Wikimedia, not a psychoanalyst's office! RG72 (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@Taylor 49 and RG72: Once again, I hope it's the last time that I've to say this (and next time other measure would be applied), we cannot accept comment here (above all comments like the one above). If we decide to give the flag and then there are abuses, the flag will be removed, so there is no issue about this but, please, don't say that a user request a flag only to harass you! You (Taylor) already requested an invalid CU, already made some inappropriate comments in the previous request for deflag, and now you're continuing! This is unacceptable and we don't play this game here. On the other hand, you know that I've always followed eowikt and helped you cleaning some things, and I know that, after Vami's inactivity, Taylor has worked a lot to improve the project (and certainly does not vandalize). Before, however, there was a climate bordering on blocks, I saw comments in which Taylor and Vami called each other "terrorists", sufficient stuff for an immediate block. So, please, let's stop acting like we are in kindergarten. You both must use different and more cordial tone, in compliance with Wikilove and UCoC, and start working for the same goal (more content and more quality in the projects). Remember that it is not the users that count, but the contents, so please let's focus on them and stop fighting! If you don't like each other, try to work on different topics, the important thing is that the project does not get involved in disputes between users! Thanks for your understanding! --Superpes15 (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I completely agree that it is high time to stop this kindergarten with infantile grievances and fears. I will add that I have nothing to do with Vami - the statement that I and Vami are the same person is another one of the paranoid statements, which I did not even comment on due to its obvious absurdity. RG72 (talk) 03:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
@RG72: Yep, I never thought it, I mentioned Vami just to remind people of the climate of discord present on the project (a project in which the stewards removed the sysops after serious abuses)! Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

شاه زمان پټان@pswikipedia

Status:    Not done

Hello! I am Shah Zaman (شاه_زمان_پټان) and have been working for Pashto Wikipedia years ago, I see so many small self promotion pages by user that needs to be deleted, and there are some templates that needs updates: but they were closed by previous admin because of the bad situation at that time, I want to delete at some self promotion page pages and also do I want to refresh some locked templates and for that I need to be an administrator Best regards Patan ~~ — The preceding unsigned comment was added by شاه زمان پټان (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Not done @شاه زمان پټان: The request is dated over two months ago. Why did you only post here now? We cant' consider it and you should open a new one (and posting here after 1 week). Thanks for your understanding! --Superpes15 (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Pashto Wikipedia currently has very few active users, so I waited to attract the opinion of professional users who have done basic work on Pashto Wikipedia, so this process took some time. شاه زمان پټان (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
@شاه زمان پټان: The flag could be granted even with 0 votes, as explained in the instructions above and there is no need to keep a local request opened for over 2 months. Please open a new local discussion, and post here after a week. Thanks for your understanding Superpes15 (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Kajtus_von_Rzywiec@plwikinews

Status:    Done

Hi! I would like to request temporary administrator rights for a period of 3 months. The vote of the local community of our Wiki ended clearly. Best wishes Kajtus von Rzywiec (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Kajtus von Rzywiec:, I already granted you a 3 months-flag in November 2023 and, looking at the consensus, I can also grant 6 months or more. Do you still want another 3 months-flag, or can we extend it for more time? Thanks Superpes15 (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15 Thanks for the suggestions. I was considering a longer period, but I decided on 3 months. Maybe the next one will be longer? I would not like to change the period to a longer one now, because I think it would be unfair to people who voted for it for three months, no more. However, I will schedule the next vote for a longer period so as not to add pointless work to the Stewards. :) Kajtus von Rzywiec (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.
@Kajtus von Rzywiec: You can just ask for the flag locally and let stewards decide the expiration (on the basis of consensus) :) Thanks! --Superpes15 (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15 thank You! :) Kajtus von Rzywiec (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Haoreima@mniwikipedia

Status:    Done

(I am contributing to mni wikipedia since its incubator stage. I have the native level knowledge of mni or Meitei language as well as Mtei or Meitei script. The discussion on the Request for Adminship is now 7 days old, having some questions and answers as well as some comments and votes from the community. I started my RFA in a separate page named mni:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Haoreima, whose contents were merged into & redirected to the page mni:ꯋꯤꯀꯤꯄꯦꯗꯤꯌꯥ:ꯆꯨꯞꯂꯤ ꯄꯥꯏꯅꯕ ꯍꯪꯒꯠꯆꯕ by another user on the beginning day.) Haoreima (talk) 01:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Như Gây Mê@viwikiquote

Status:    Done

Vietnamese Wikiquote currently has no sysop and no bureaucrat, I want to develop my mother language project long-term as well as prevent some IPs from deliberately vandalism the sandbox recently [currently IPs still continue to vandalism the Sandbox] (discussion has 2 supports, it's been 7 days). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 03:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

SM7@hi.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Need temporary Admin as well as Interface Admin Rights (6 Months would be fine). I am Interface admin at hi.wikipedia and have enough experience and fulfill the requirements. Thanks in advance. --SM7--talk-- 01:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.
Without any vote, we cannot grant 6 months at first requests, next time there won't likely be any problem :) --Superpes15 (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15 Thanks! That's fine. Hope I'll finish my work within that time too :) --SM7--talk-- 15:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
@SM7: Or you can extend the flag if you want :P Superpes15 (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Qu0404@cebwiki

Status:    Done

User Qu0404 has contributed a lot to cebwiki project, so I nominated him as sysop. Discussion has been 7 days. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 12:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

M. Omarius@av.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I leave a request to obtain the status of an administrator in the Avar Wikipedia (if such an opportunity is provided, then to obtain the permanent status of an administrator). At the moment, we do not have an active administrator in our section, which is why it is difficult to protect and edit protected pages, as well as delete pages that do not comply with Wikipedia standards. I have already been an administrator several times, and I am familiar with the duties and rights.

We also have to leave a request for the status and administrator of the interface, since we do not have one, and therefore it is not possible to configure technical pages. If you need to submit another request to get the status of an interface administrator, let us know.

With respect and gratitude. M. Omarius (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2025-02-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Umarxon III@uzwiktionary

Status:    Done

Please, promote me to administrator status on Uzbek Wiktionary. Umarxon III (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC).

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Umarxon III (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC).

IJzeren Jan@vowiki

Status:    Done

Greetings! Since my adminship at the Volapük Wikipedia is about to expire once again, I'd like to request permanent adminship or, if that's not possible, prolongation for as long as possible. Thanks in advance! IJzeren Jan (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2026-02-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 07:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much! IJzeren Jan (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

شاه_زمان_پټان@pswiki

Status:    Done

Hello! I am Shah Zaman (شاه_زمان_پټان) and have been working for Pashto Wikipedia years ago, I see so many small self promotion pages by user that needs to be deleted, and there are some templates that needs updates: but they were closed by previous admin because of the bad situation at that time, I want to delete at some self promotion page pages and also do I want to refresh some locked templates and for that I need to be an administrator Best regards Patan ~~ — The preceding unsigned comment was added by شاه زمان پټان (talk) 05:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2024-05-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

MubasherKaleem@skr.wiktionary

Status:    Not done

I have worked as admin. I want to serve as admin also, I may be granted permanent adminship. MubasherKaleem (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Not done @MubasherKaleem:  Hi, it seems you started your RfA today, please post here after a week (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but my translator doesn't work so well). Also, per MVR policy, please note that we can't likely grant a permanent adminship here. Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Robertjamal12@fat.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

(your remarks) Hello, I've been an administrator on the Fante Wikipedia for sometime now and I'd like to continue administrating on the Fante Wikipedia to help maintain and tackle vandalism. Thank you -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Robertjamal12: The link does not lead to any discussion or existing page. If a local discussion exists, could you link to it? EPIC (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
fat:Wikipedia:Admin request, but the latest request for adminship appears to be more than two months old? Johannnes89 (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Not done for now, @Robertjamal12: We sadly cannot grant a request that old, so you will need to open a new request for us to grant you the rights. It should be running for at least 7 days, but no more than two weeks. EPIC (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
@EPIC Well noted. Thank you -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 18:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Reptilien.19831209BE1@wa.wikisource

Status:    Done

Administrator AND Interface administrator accesses requested for the 4th year, discussion posted since more than 2 weeks without any comment. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2025-02-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. EPIC (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Như Gây Mê@cebwiki

Status:    Done

It's been 7 days since the discussion (Asia/Manila time, UTC+8). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 05:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

 On hold Hello @Như Gây Mê:. You should have mentioned here that you've a local bureaucrat. I'll put this on hold and will wait for another week (I'm trying to contact the local bureaucrat and, if they don't reply after a week, we'll proceed). Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 11:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
I understood and will wait! But I have a question, do I need to create another discussion to request bureaucrat permission? Thanks Halley luv Filipino ❤ 12:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
@Như Gây Mê: Unfortunately the project is not so large and doesn't need other bureaucrats (so we won't flag new 'crats - see here for further informations). If I looked correctly, the current 'crat falls into AAR23 and, if they don't reply after the notifications, will likely be removed. For obvious reasons we cannot remove bureaucrats where they already exist but, in small projects where they don't exist or have been removed, we currently manage the permissions, also because it's difficult to see a project with 6 permanent sysop and 15 votes made by active users. I personally don't see the need for bureaucrats in projects with very few actions required (this flag is mainly needed in larger wikis). Furthermore, local bureaucrats generally give flags without expiration, this, in projects where there is no broad consensus and users are often inactives, can lead to problems. If I were the only bureaucrat of such a project, personally, I would resign immediately so as not to leave problems even in the event of my inactivity (but it is a personal opinion - even if I have seen others who have done so in the past - but I also see some users who want to keep the 'crat flag even without performing any action for years). Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 12:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
I understood, thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 12:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Messages are for reminder only :@Superpes15: Hi, It's been a week but the bureaucrat still hasn't responded. Can you confirm that? Halley luv Filipino ❤ 01:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
@Như Gây Mê: Please don't rush. I'm in touch with the 'crat who replied to my email. So please wait for further communications! Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 10:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Done Granted for 2 months to expire on 2024-04-11. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.
I set the same expiration as sysop flag. The local bureaucrat said they were not interested and that they have been out for a long time and no longer remembers how to do it. They will probably fall under the AAR! Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 11:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
I see, thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 11:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Gerges@arwikinews

Status:    Withdrawn

I need Interface administrator permission to add plugins to arwikinews.--Gerges (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold User contacted via mail for further details --Superpes15 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
@Gerges: Also, I see an opposition, and per MVR policy this requires a full discussion. Has this vote been discussed? Thanks. Superpes15 (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15: I responded to an opposing person, but he still has his opinion.-- Gerges (talk) 12:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Superpes15, My opposition was to newcomer activity. Dear Greges is a new contributor to arwikinews (Vote has been created after two weeks' activity), and this is his first experience as interface-admin. Finally, the vote wasn't posted in the community village pump, nor the wanted plugins. Thx -Mohanad (talk) 13:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Superpes15, Cancel this request, I do not want permissions Interface administrator.-- Gerges (talk) 01:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Request withdrawn --Superpes15 (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Hzy980512@zh.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Local consensus reached with no objection. I would appreciate it if you could prolong the interface adminship for the same expiration as the sysop one. Thank you very much. -- Hzy980512 (talk) 11:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2026-01-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.
As promised in the previous request, same expiration, thanks :) --Superpes15 (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Engr.ismailbhutta@skr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

User:Engr.ismailbhutta is doing hard work to promote skr.wikipedia.org. He need Interface administratorship to change the interface. Previous I was interface admin there, but could not complete work in 3 months. Please give him rights for longer duration.--Ameen Akbar (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold User contacted via mail for further details --Superpes15 (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Engr.ismailbhutta: Have you read my 2nd emails? Thanks Superpes15 (talk) 07:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I have replied your 2nd email today, sorry for late, regards, Engr.ismailbhutta (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
@Engr.ismailbhutta: I replied immediately and I'm still waiting for you :) Superpes15 (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2024-08-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much, regards, Engr.ismailbhutta (talk) 05:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Jimmy Project@satwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Hello, Currently Santali Wikipedia has no Check users, I was edit basis to fix some things for the newly made Santali Wikipedia. Now a community discussion was held upon my request for Check users . I hope you will consider my request and give me the rights as a Check users for future well-being of the Santali Wikipedia. Thanks. I need Check users on Santali Wikipedia, So after voting in our community I have applied for the Check users in the santali wikipedia. Please access grant me.Because I fight for vandalism and protected my own mother tongue community. I improve article on Santali Wikipedia. Jimmy Project (talk) 08:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@Superpes15: Is this Birmal Hembram again, perhaps? EPIC (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
for sure, now manipulating an old request for interface adminship [7]. Johannnes89 (talk) 08:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Omg! Ok I'm starting using strong methods --Superpes15 (talk) 10:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

LD@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

LD (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Mathis B@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, frwiki nomination committee has decided to appoint me as a CU. As a former CU, I have already signed the confidentiality agreement. Thanks. Mathis B (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Lewisiscrazy@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, frwiki nomination committee has decided to appoint me as a CU. I have signed the confidentiality agreement earlier today. Thanks. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same. --❄️Mykola❄️ 16:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Done You will be contacted by @Krd: for ML/chat/private IRC stuff :) --Superpes15 (talk) 09:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you @Superpes15. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 10:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Le chat perché@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, frwiki nomination committee has decided to appoint me as a CU. I have signed the confidentiality agreement earlier today. Thanks.--Le chat perché (talk) 10:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Done You will be contacted too for private accesses :) --Superpes15 (talk) 10:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of access

Esquilo@svwiki

Status:    Done

Per svwiki policy, administrators are elected for periods of one year and each year have to be reelected for a new period. This time Esquilo did not wish to run for reelection. As the admin period is now over, the sysop rights should be removed. EPIC (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Kitayama@svwiki

Status:    Done

Per svwiki policy, administrators are elected for periods of one year and each year have to be reelected for a new period. Kitayama was left a notice on their talk page, but later indicated that they did not wish to run for reelection. As the admin period has ended, the sysop rights should be removed. EPIC (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Minorax@mediawiki

Status:    Done

Inactive here, no need for sysop and no need to wait for 1 day. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Okkn@wikidata

Status:    Done

Please remove the sysop rights for Okkn due to inactivity according to policy at wikidata. User has made 4 sysop actions in the last six months as of February 1st (see [8]). --Lymantria (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Thanks for your service --Superpes15 (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Gwendal@brwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights on the Breton Wikipedia. Gwendal (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --❄️Mykola❄️ 21:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Done -- Amanda (she/her) 15:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Sreejithk2000@mlwiki

Status:    Done

The user appears to have made no edits in last 3 months, less than 100 edits (7 edits only) in the last 12 months and no admin action in the last 3 months. Adithyak1997 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

EPIC@svwikibooks

Status:    Done

My adminship on svwikibooks can be removed. I'm aware it's temporary, but I was mostly there to do some maintenance work and delete some old files and test pages, which is now done. I don't really plan to be active there in the future, and the global sysops are more active than me with anti-spam tasks on that wiki, thus they can handle it instead, in cases it is needed. EPIC (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

FYI, this is uncontroversial, so you don't have to wait the standard 24 hour hold period for this one. EPIC (talk) 23:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

PiRSquared17@global

Status:    Done

Per policy, global rollbackers should be removed for inactivity after two years. This user's last edit was 5 January 2021. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

YourEyesOnly@global

Status:    Done

Per policy, global rollbackers should be removed for inactivity after two years. This user's last edit was 6 February 2022. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

מקף@hewiki

Status:    Withdrawn

Please revoke the administrator right on HeWiki.
Thank you, · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 08:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --❄️Mykola❄️ 08:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Thanks for your service --Superpes15 (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I withdrew my request but the flag was removed anyway! I'm sorry for this but could you please accept my withdrawal? · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 17:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
@מקף: My bad, I removed it without seeing your edit, I talked with some other stews and we decide to accept the withdrawal! So I'm restoring the flag! --Superpes15 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you all · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 17:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Flag restored. Closing as Request withdrawn. --Superpes15 (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Pequod76@itwiki

Status:    Done

Hi. I ask for my sysop rights on it.wikipedia to be revoked. Thanks. :) Pequod76(talk) 13:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --❄️Mykola❄️ 13:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Dovno@hewiki

Status:    Not done

I hope this is the page where this request should be written. In the Hebrew Wikipedia, a vote to remove bureaucrat user:Dovno rights has ended. The vote ended with the following results: A total of 149 voting .42.3% voted for removal. 57.7% voted iagainst. see here

In the Hebrew Wikipedia, a 70% majority is required for the rights of a bureaucrat. See here. I ask that you decide according to the results. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Unlike appointing bureaucrats, for which 70% support is required, for revocation of a bureaucrat's permissions, there must be over 50% who support removing the authorization. Since such a majority, there is no reason to remove the permissions. Neriah - 💬 - 20:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
A bureaucrat who insists on being a bureaucrat after having a small majority, what does that say about him? Dovno should resign, because he has no trust in the community. To be elected you need 70%, these were actually elections. Hanay (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If he wants to resign, he can apply himself. The vote does not require him to resign, so he cannot be forcibly fired. Neriah - 💬 - 21:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The majority required for appointing a bureaucrat is irrelevant in a no-confidence vote in a bureaucrat. Hanay please do not attempt to overturn the results with such interpretation. Neriah is right: 42.3% votes to remove against 57.7% votes who object the removal is not sufficient to remove. The motion of no-confidence has to gain more than 50% of the votes in order to remove the bureaucrat's rights. Yoss001 (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I see that there is a local procedure described. If the translator translated correctly, the number of "Support" votes should be more than "Against" votes. That is, 50%+1 vote. In this case, the permissions shouldn't be removed. I didn't find a local rule that would confirm that the bureaucrat must confirm 70% trust. Resignation is a personal matter of the user and depends only on his will. We can't force them to do it. --❄️Mykola❄️ 21:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
See here In Hebrew: בהצבעה ייבחרו שלושת המועמדים שמספר הקולות בעד מינוים, פחות מספר הקולות נגד מינוים, הוא הגדול ביותר, ובלבד שזכו לשיעור תמיכה מינימלי של 70% מתוך המצביעים בעדם או נגדם.And in English translation: in the vote, the three candidates will be chosen whose number of votes in favor of appointments, minus the number of votes against appointments, is the largest, provided that they have won a minimum support rate of 70% of those voting for or against them. Hanay (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This is misleading and should not be an acceptable behavior : Hanay is citing the rules of appointing a bureaucrat, but she is not citing the rules for voting to remove rights: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%95%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%93%D7%99%D7%94:%D7%91%D7%99%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9C_%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%90%D7%94#%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%94%D7%9C_%D7%94%D7%A6%D7%A2%D7%94, section 5. Yoss (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Misleading? really Yoss? I gave all the information including links. But it's nice to see Wikipedians from the Hebrew Wikipedia, who have never been on the meta, suddenly enter here and comment. Hanay (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
@Hanay As I wrote to you there, there is a division between the appointment procedure and the removal procedure. For a nomination you need a majority of 70%, and for removing permissions you need a majority of 50%. There was no such majority, so the permissions will not be removed. Good week. Neriah - 💬 - 21:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Yes, 70% support is required to be elected. Voting in election and voting for removal are different things. In many Wikipedias it is like this, for example in my home Wiki, to elect a bureaucrat need 80% support, to remove 50%+1 vote. Currently, I see the situation as I wrote above. If you believe that a voting for removal should be given the same criteria as an election, you should initiate a discussion with your local community to change the rules. ❄️Mykola❄️ 21:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Mykola. In a few months there will be new elections for bureaucrats. Then 57% will not be enough for Dovno. He Should have resigned. But it probably won't happen. Just proves how unfit he is to be a bureaucrat. Hanay (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Ahonc@ukwikibooks

Status:    Done

I am not active in this project for years. Anatoliy (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions — Elton (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Acaalexaca@sr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove his bureaucrat rights per the local inactivity policy, more than a six months without sysops action. --Ранко Николић (talk) 23:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Ранко Николић, You wrote about sysop action. I see that the last action as a sysop he did on January 10. Did you mean the bureaucrat actions only? --❄️Mykola❄️ 23:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment Local-administrator comment/коментар локалног администратора
In Serbian: Ранко, у шоку сам да видим да се једном активном локалном администратору уклањају бирократске овласти, када је неактиван као бирократа. Иако је у теорији дозвољено такво уклањање, у пракси се увек бирократске овласти уклањају заједно са администраторским у једном пакету! Редовно пратим алатку за (не)активност наших носилаца напредних корисничких овласти https://meta.toolforge.org/stewardry/srwiki?sysop=1&bureaucrat=1 и нисам никада раније видео да се месецима неактивне бирократе, као бирократе, уклањају на један овакав невиђен и, да не кажем, скандалозан начин. Зато, молим те, покажи ми/нам овде тај преседан, ако исти уопште постоји – али, колико ја знам, он не постоји.
In English: Ranko, I am shocked to see that one active local administrator is having their bureaucrat rights removed because they have not been active as a bureaucrat. Despite the fact that, in theory, such removal is permitted, in practice bureucrat rights are always removed in tandem with administrator rights! I regularly use the (in)activity tool to check the status of our local holders of advanced permissions https://meta.toolforge.org/stewardry/srwiki?sysop=1&bureaucrat=1 and I have never before seen bureaucrats inactive for months being stripped only of their bureaucrat access in such an unprecedented, not to say scandalous manner. That is why I am asking you to point me/us to that precedent if it even exists - but, as far as I know, it does not. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment Local-administrator comment/коментар локалног администратора The request was posted in full accordance with SWP rules and project's best interest at heart. Personal impressions are of little relevance for Meta. — Sadko (words are wind) 12:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

3(MG)², Hexasoft and Poudou!@frwiki

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Frwiki's nomination comitee decided not to renew the checkuser rights for these three users. --Myloufa (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Noting that correct link is at w:fr:Discussion Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Renouvellement#Renouvellement 01/24; announcement of results was at w:fr:Special:Diff/212325315/w:fr:Special:Diff/212325289. I've split the request into three from the original request. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Bestiasonica@ca.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

Asking for a removal of administrator rights for this user. No activities for more than one year. You can see the consens about this time here and the discussion with the acknowledge and acceptation of the user linked above. Jmrebes (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Done Thanks for your service!--Superpes15 (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Creosota@eswiki

Status:    Done

Less than 50 administrative actions in the last two years. Sysop+Bureaucrat rights must be removed. --Stïnger （会話） 01:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC).

Done Thanks for your service --Superpes15 (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Burocan@azwiki

Status:    Done

The user himself has given up the sysop right. --Turkmen talk 07:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold until 20:49 UTC --Superpes15 (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

SilkTork@enwiki

Status:    Done

Self-request. Please remove bureaucrat rights. SilkTork (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --❄️Mykola❄️ 03:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Ebe123@incubatorwiki

Status:    Done

Per local policy (As with the admin policy on Meta and Commons, inactive administrators may have their access removed. According to this policy, any sysop inactive on Incubator will be desysoped. "Inactive" means virtually no edits or log actions in the past twelve months.). Last edit on 4 November 2021. Ameisenigel (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Yair rand@incubatorwiki

Status:    Done

Per local policy (As with the admin policy on Meta and Commons, inactive administrators may have their access removed. According to this policy, any sysop inactive on Incubator will be desysoped. "Inactive" means virtually no edits or log actions in the past twelve months.). Last edit on 28 February 2022. Ameisenigel (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Filtre antiabus@frwikibooks

Status:    Done

Unused abuse filter account. Current abuse filter account is b:fr:Utilisateur:Filtre anti-abus. Ameisenigel (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Done — xaosflux Talk 10:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

KRLS@cawikipedia

Status:    Done

Please, remove my checkuser permission, because my term has ended. KRLS (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

@KRLS: I'm not understanding how it works. The flag requires an annual election? And, if so, was it done for the other CUs this year? Thanks. --Superpes15 (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
@Superpes15 My request is specific to my situation. I am requesting a voluntary withdrawal because I previously stated that I would resign as a checkuser once the new checkusers became proficient with the tools. KRLS (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
@KRLS: And we need to know if this is a resignation (so we have to put on hold for 24 hour) or if some terms ended and you have a clear policy which says it (since you stated "my term has ended" and linked a local page). I also asked how it works on cawiki just to make the process clearer, I don't see any issue in replying, so I ask you again: Does the flag require an annual election? And, if so, was it done for the other CUs this year? Hope you can reply and thanks for your help. Superpes15 (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Ok. It's a resignation. KRLS (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Ok, so this request is  On hold until 07:55 UTC, btw I'm pinging in the edit summary some ombuds because the policy is not clear for me (I read, if I'm not mistaken, that a CU must be reconfirmed with a new election every 18 months) and also I'm not understanding if it's respected since you didn't reply! Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Superpes15 on behalf of the ombuds commission I'm acknowledging that we've seen your ping. Please contact us through one of our private channels (i.e. OC#Submission) with a more detailed description of what you are requesting us to do. Thanks. RoySmith (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Done for the flag
@RoySmith: Why do you need a so bureaucratic procedure? I've no idea of what's happening and have no time to further investigate. You are part of the body who should delve deeper into these matters. If you want to take a look, go ahead, otherwise I have no problems if you don't do anything, but I certainly have nothing to report since I have no idea what the policy says, and you don't need to have a formal complaint for investigate a local policy! Thanks --Superpes15 (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Mcoffsky@ukwiki

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop flag due to inactivity. The user have performed his last admin action more than 1 year ago, so according to the local policy his sysop rights shall be removed if no responce is given in a month after notification (see notification). Andriy.v (talk) 09:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 21:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Jedudedek@cswikibooks

Status:    Done

Per local policy (Správci, který po dobu půl roku neprovede žádnou zaznamenanou správcovskou akci, mohou být automaticky odebrána práva správce. [An administrator who does not perform any recorded administrative action for half a year may be automatically deprived of administrator rights.]. Last edit on 6 August 2023, last logged action on 15 February 2023. Ameisenigel (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Vangelis@nl.wikibooks

Status:    Not done

User resigned on 17 September 2022. Ameisenigel (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Not done that does not appear to be a sufficient resignation per nl:b:Wikibooks:Regelingen rond moderatoren; please start a local discussion on this matter. This project has active bureaucrats who should be able to close such discussion. — xaosflux Talk 13:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Фільтр редагувань@ukwikibooks

Status:    Done

This is the old Abuse filter name. Please remove sysop rights. Andriy.v (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Vangelis@nl.wikibooks

Status:    Done

User resigned on 17 September 2022.
- Erik Baas (talk) 06:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC) (sysop/bureaucrat)

Done. Considering they resigned more than one year ago, there's probably no need to wait the standard 24 hour hold period for this one. So, removed with many thanks for their service. EPIC (talk) 07:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Redigeringsfilter@svwiki

Status:    Done

Unused abuse filter account, see link above; sv:User:Missbruksfilter is the current account. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Done — xaosflux Talk 16:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

پالایهٔ خرابکاری@fawikinews

Status:    Done

Unused abuse filter account. Currently used abuse filter account is پالایهٔ ویرایش Ameisenigel (talk) 09:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Done. EPIC (talk) 09:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2024-02&oldid=26313832"