Steward requests/Permissions/2017-10

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Gurbakhshish chand@pawikipedia

Status:    Done

I request for permanent adminship this time.Gurbakhshish chand (talk) 11:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 19 October 2017. Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Araz Yaquboglu@az.wikibooks

Status:    Done

For permanent... Thanks! --►Cekli829 20:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Same as above, supports from actually active users are definitely not enough to grant permanent adminship, done for 12 months, renewable. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Vituzzu. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 07:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Base@wikimania2018wikimedia

Status:    Done

Hi. Please give me an administrator and translate admin flags on the wiki for mostly i18n/l10n related work as well as general admin routine. The wiki was notified a week ago in linked from sidebar Community portal but no response followed (apparently the team is yet to get there). It would be the forth Wikimania wiki I am an admin and translate admin of: I was an admin and tA of wm2016, wm2015, and wm2014 before the wikis were closed. I am also an admin here, and in several other wikis. Base (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Aniket@gu.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello, Being oldest and yet active member on Gujarati Wikipedia, the community have been voting for me for permanent adminship since past two terms but how ever I was granted temporary adminship in all my terms. This time also, community wants to elect me as a permanent administrator. Have been temporary admin since past 4 terms now.

Voting is going on at Gu.wikipedia.org since Tuesday, 17th October 2017 and will concluded on Monday, 23rd October 2017.

Thanks & Regards, Aniket

 On hold till 24 October 2017. Ruslik (talk) 18:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Is it temporary? if yes, till which date? --Aniket (talk) 09:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Permanent. Ruslik (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Фред-Продавец звёзд@ruwikibooks

Status:    Not done

Требую присвоения флага администратора Русского Викиучебника по результатам обсуждения и голосования в сообществе. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Я не вижу консенсуса для присвоения флага администратора. Ruslik (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
The first supporter only has one edit in the project - which is this support. Apparently, canvassing is going on.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Wow, no! This was a fake-voting, all users on that page have no edits in ru-wikibooks. Iniquity (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Well, Леонид Макаров has some sizable contribution, all other supporters are indeed driveby accounts. A clear case of disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
And the RfA was linked last moment [1], shortly before it was closed.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Not done Ruslik (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Хм, и куда же надо было смотреть, чтобы не увидеть консенсуса? Ссылка приложена. Поскольку в Викиучебнике, действительно, практически отсутствуют активные участники (а сообщество как таковое отсутствует), голосовать позволяется всем участникам, имеющим активность в проектах Фонда (независимо от таковой в конкретном Викиучебнике). Глобальный вклад всех участников обсуждения можно посмотреть здесь, все, кто голосовал, имеют большой стаж, а кое-где и административные флаги. Если же по каким-то причинам вы не считаете это консенсусом, можете обратить внимание на аргументы. С моей стороны всё правильно. Так что запрос в силе. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


Bureaucrat access

Teles@brwikimedia

Status:    Done

This is not a content wiki; just a wiki for the user group, and I am one the contact persons. Currently, there is no bureacrat on this wiki. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Vini_175@brwikimedia

Status:    Done

This is not a content wiki; just a wiki for the user group, and Vini_175 is one the contact persons. Currently, there is no bureacrat on this wiki. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 19:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Benoit Rochon@atj.wikipedia.org

Status:    Not done

I asked the atj community to become bureaucrat on their Wiki. I've been working with them for years now, and I would like to support them with bureaucrat tools. Thank you very much and have a nice day! Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Only five votes, which is not sufficient for promotion - the project is probably too small to have bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Stewards, you may wish to consider an exception in this case, especially if Benoit agrees not to promote anyone else to bureaucrat. He is president of Wikimedia Canada, and is working hard to help promote and create wikis in indigenous Canadian (North American) languages. If this would be useful to him in these efforts, I would trust him to use the 'crat tools correctly. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your responses Ruslik and StevenJ81. In a near future, Wikimedia Canada will help indigenous communities to get organised, and create their own Wikipedia. It would be less time consumming if I can help to manage the Canadian local wikis, especially that they don't speak English to do Stewards requests. @Ruslik: how many supporters would be a decent vote? Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Generally we like to see permanent admins, and at least 10 supporting votes from active community members. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Ok, thank you guys. I will launch the discussion on the local wiki. Best. Benoit Rochon (talk) 17:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz, you say 10 supports, but can it be ~5 instead? Because local community is still small for the moment. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
If the community is small, it does not need bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

CheckUser access

There'sNoTime@enwiki

Status:    Done

Hopefully not stepping on any toes, advised that this could be requested here. I'm already signed (as Samtar, later renamed) and identified to WMF -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Just a note that I (perhaps erroneously) advised TNT that they could request the CU/OS flags since they had signed the agreement. However, after checking the explicit wording of the CU policy, it says that the request should be made by an arbitrator. However, there is past precedent for granting the rights requested by the user after the ArbCom announcement. But while this request can probably be granted, I shall refrain from such controversial suggestions in the future :P – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
We do usually make the requests, in fact I just came here to do so! Consider this request endorsed, though. Also note that the access noticeboard page was updated to reflect the new username, in case you're wondering where it went: [2]. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Access granted. @There'sNoTime: please reply to my email so that I can conclude your request. RadiX∞ 22:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

New en.wiki checkusers

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

All appointed by ArbCom. On hold pending signatures/addition to Access to nonpublic information policy/Noticeboard. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter, BU Rob13, NinjaRobotPirate, and Zzuuzz: Please look at your email and send me a reply. Thank you, RadiX∞ 03:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Done except Berean Hunter, @RadiX and Trijnstel: for mailing list and wiki access--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I will let @RadiX: do the work now on cu-l/cu wiki, as he collected the email addresses. But I'll do IRC. Trijnsteltalk 09:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: Doing.... RadiX∞ 10:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
All done for now, except Berean Hunter. RadiX∞ 11:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Done for Berean Hunter as well. RadiX∞ 20:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

EVinente@ptwiki

Status:    Done

The community of pt.wiki has approved my role as local CheckUser for one more year. Please, for the record, turn off and on my permission for one more year. Best regards. EVinente (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, 'temporary' for 1 year. Trijnsteltalk 16:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Oversight access

Xeno@enwiki

Status:    Done

Former functionary who has been re-appointed by the enwiki ArbCom as an oversighter. Already identified to the Foundation. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 04:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

There'sNoTime@enwiki

Status:    Done

Hopefully not stepping on any toes, advised that this could be requested here. I'm already signed (as Samtar, later renamed) and identified to WMF -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

(Endorsing this request as an enwiki arbitrator; see the checkuser request above.) GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Access granted. @There'sNoTime: please reply to my email so that I can conclude your request. RadiX∞ 22:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

New en.wiki oversighters

Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Appointed by ArbCom. On hold pending signatures & addition to Access to nonpublic information policy/Noticeboard. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Done@Trijnstel: for IRC access--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Yep, will do. Trijnsteltalk 09:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Removal of access

Neukoln@hewiki

Status:    Done

pls remove my sysop permissions. Neukoln (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day per standard practice. RadiX∞ 12:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Inactive sysops on Meta

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Sadness. --MF-W 13:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Done sadly. @Trijnstel: Would you please remove Barras from the cu mailing list? He does not have checkuser access elsewhere. His rights should also be removed on checkuserwiki. Thanks, RadiX∞ 14:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have been more clear. Afaics, Barras does not yet fulfill the inactivity criteria according to the CU and OS policies, so he should have kept those rights. --MF-W 16:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
If CU/OS are required to be administrators though, the rights should be removed at the same time. Meta:Oversighters says they must be administrators, though I don't see a similar page for CU. --Rschen7754 16:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
They shouldn't. Meta:Oversighters isn't a policy yet. Matiia (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Only the appointment process section is not approved as a policy yet. AFAIK adminiship is a prerequisite for granting high level accesses (CU/OS) in almost any Wikimedia project so far. RadiX∞ 16:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Playing devil's advocate here, but that's not true in every project (nlwiki for example). Anyway, since this isn't the first time this has come up, perhaps we should clarify the policy. --Rschen7754 16:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Yep, that's why I said "almost". Anyway Meta:Oversighters#Introduction states that oversighters are "highly trusted administrators". RadiX∞ 16:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
An additional information (it can be of some help): the page Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2017 further states that sysops rights have been removed alongside other advanced permissions (since 2009). RadiX∞ 17:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
See (October 2013) RadiX∞ 17:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't want to remove Barras from the CU mailing list yet and I'm inclined to add back the CU rights. But @Barras: what do you want? Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
(For the record: the reason is that I don't know of any policy that Meta CUs have to be admins, although I know it's not common. Trijnsteltalk 22:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC))
I've just followed what is prescribed at the top of this page ("Adminship and other advanced permissions removed without notice") and had been done before. In any case I agree about asking @Barras: if he wants the CU/OS flags back or not. Meanwhile I suggest we mark this request as on hold and wait until he responds (maybe for one week). If he wants us to add CU/OS to his account again, then it should be OK. No objections on my part, at least. RadiX∞ 23:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
What's this fuss all about? RadiX's removals are in line with the current inactivity policy. If you all watch the very first round of removals that happened under the new system back in Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2009 you'll see that administrator and all advanced permissions ("other rights") were removed without further notice, and has been since always like that. As much as I dislike Barras loosing the flags, policy is equal for all of us. If you feel the policy should be amended for future runs please raise the discussion in the appropriate public forums. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Considering that Barras himself seems to interpret the policy the same way, I don't think he will be asking for the rights back. --Rschen7754 07:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
At second thought I removed him from the list. I guess you were right in removing the rights. Trijnsteltalk 23:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Илья Драконов@tg.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please, remove my sysop rights in this wiki. Now I don't have time to help there. Cheers. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC).

On-hold for 24 hours (till 14:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)) in case you change your mind masti <talk> 17:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Varnent@metawiki

Status:    Done

--MF-W 22:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 22:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Yoav Nachtailer@he.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. Yoav Nachtailer (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Oh hold for the customary day. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Ajraddatz; Is there any problem here? Yoav Nachtailer is not active in Hebrew wikipedia since March 2017. According to our policy he completed 3 years as administrator, and he should be nominated again or ask here for removal. Hanay (talk) 14:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Done Thank you for your service! Matanya (talk) 05:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
@Hanay: it's our standard practice to hold all self-requests without rationale for a day, to allow the user to change their mind. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

User -jkb-@de.wikipedia

Status:    Done

User has been granted temporary sysop flag for his term in the German Wikipedia arbcom until the end of November, -jkb-, however, stepped down last night, which is why his sysop access should be removed now. Best regards, → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks to -jkb- for their work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Edmenb@eswiki

Status:    Done

This user has been inactive for over 1 year. Per the global CU policy, please remove CU. Rschen7754 18:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Done with many thanks for their past work. RadiX∞ 20:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

slav4@hewiki

Status:    Done

Hello please remove my admin permissions Slav4 (talk) 10:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Ali1@ar.wikipedia

Status:    Done

User has not made the required 10 actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop rights --Alaa :)..! 10:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for their work. RadiX∞ 20:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Ori@hewiki

Status:    Done

Hello, Please remove sysop right of Ori due to vote Itay17 (talk) 07:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Stryn (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Itay17 (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Ori, thank you for the job you have done. Good luck in your African internetless life. IKhitron (talk) 11:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Yuma@itwiki

Status:    Done

Hello, please remove my sysop rights, due to my absence in the next months. Thanks! —Yuma (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day per our standard practice. RadiX∞ 19:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Done. Matiia (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Pavlo1@uawikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the user's bureaucrat and administrator flags. According to the former Board decision linked only Board and Audit Committee members hold those flags (a specific per-user Board decision can be made to give administrator flag to other user, which is not the case) and he is no longer a Board member since he has left WMUA and was replaced as Board Secretary as per the latter of the decisions. Base (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 01:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Proger@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop status of user Proger according to voting results. For removal we need at least 2/3 of all valid votes. In this case 20 users voted, 19 for removal. --Sortilegus (talk) 20:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The reason is inactivity? Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes Ruslik--Sortilegus (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Done. Ruslik (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Orartu@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop status of user Orartu according to voting results. For removal we need at least 2/3 of all valid votes. In this case 20 users voted, 19 for removal. --Sortilegus (talk) 20:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The reason is inactivity? Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes Ruslik--Sortilegus (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Done. Ruslik (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

AdnanSa@bs.wikipedia

Status:    Done

The user hasn't made a single logged action in the six months prior to the removal request (local inactivity policy). – Srdjan m (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 16:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

RusdianaDablang@id.wikipedia

Status:    Done

The user has been accused that he did abuse of power in Indonesian Wikipedia. Therefore, community take vote about it and approved to remove his privilege as administrator in Indonesian Wikipedia. Albertus Aditya (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Iamchenzetian@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop status of user Iamchenzetian. The user has been inactive for over 6 months and didn't come back in a month after leaving a notice.--Alexander Misel (talk) 07:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Pundit@pl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Openbk (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. Stryn (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Adrenalin@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Albam@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. Ffor the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Klutzy@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

S.BULLET.@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikier@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Xaos@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

최종욱@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

토끼군@kowiki

Status:    Done

Korean Wikipedia's new inactivity rules adopted in early October require inactive admins to sign if they wish to retain admin status: this user failed to do so within two weeks. Please remove user's advanced permissions. Thank you. For the Korean Wikipedia, — regards, Revi 14:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Remaling@cs.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Please remove my sysop rights. Thank you. --Remaling (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24h per our standard practice. RadiX∞ 15:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
I cancel this request. I am sorry. --Remaling (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Not done then. Defender (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

SpeedKing@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. SpeedKing was notified of the situation on July 22 and responded, that he doesn't need the admin flag anymore. --Edgars2007 (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Miscellaneous requests

Users Andrawaag@wikidata, Envlh@wikidata, Jsamwrites@wikidata, Tpt@wikidata

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

On October 12th, there will be a Wikidata hackathon at XLDB2017. More than 45 participants are expected. I made a request on Wikidata to temporarily add Wikidata contributors (Andrawaag, Envlh, Jsamwrites, Tpt) who will lead the hackathon to the Account creators group, but it seems that this group doesn't exist on Wikidata. Is there a solution (maybe to be added to this group in another project, like meta)? Thanks, Envlh (talk) 09:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Envlh: there is a local account creators group on Wikidata, but only stewards can add users to it. I am active on Wikidata, so I won't fill this request, but another steward can do so. The rights can be applied temporarily from now until a couple of days after the 12th to be safe. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Granted temporary until 2017-10-14. Hope that's right. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

ZUFAr@ba.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Status:    Done

I would like to import files and templates. Give me a label of the importer please.--ZUFAr (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Please start a local discussion on each wiki first, in the same manner as for temporary sysop access. – Ajraddatz (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. This request is on hold until 13 Oct to give a full week of voting. Please note that votes from accounts that do not regularly edit the project are not counted, and are not necessary for you to be granted access. @ZUFAr: Just to be clear - are you requesting the status on ba.wikibooks only? You only need the access there to import from ba.wikipedia. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Voting in ba.wiki. I would like to be importer of the ba.wiki and ba.books. I will import the files and templates from ru and en to ba.--ZUFAr (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
    Thanks for the link. Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2018-10-10. @ZUFAr: I've granted you importer rights on ba.wiki, and importer rights for a year on ba.wikibooks. If you no longer need the rights on bawiki, please let us know. Be careful using these permissions, as improper XML importing can cause damage to page histories. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2017-10&oldid=17378329"