Steward requests/Permissions/2011-02

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

JenVan@ruwikibooks

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thanks. JenVan (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 12:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Marco 27@vecwiki

Status:    Done

Please grant me bureaucrat access as per local vote. Thanks in advance, best regards. Marco 27 (msg) on it.wiki: user page — talk page 16:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Done locally :)--Nick1915 - all you want 20:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Nick! I thought bureaucrat rights couldn't be granted locally. But I got wrong! :) --Marco 27 (msg) on it.wiki: user page — talk page 21:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Mayur@hiwikiquote

Status:    Not done

Hi i have gained consensus regarding bureacrat and sysop access, kindly update my status if i am eligible--Mayur 05:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I am also agree with Dfreg that a crat bit should be granted only for those community having good no of active users and admins too, there should be atleast 5 admins vote to elect a buraucrat, otherwise Stewards can better do this jod of promoting users into sysops.But it should not depend on steward choice becoz it will create a scene of partiality, As in Hindi wikitionary a bureaucrat spundan was promoted to cratbit on behalf of 5 to 7 votes and he is not active in this project since 2005.So stewards should form atleast a minimum set policy to avoid such situations otherwise it may get into trouble to say that stewards just do everything on community consensus, :-) Thank you--Mayur (talk•Email) 18:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Not done hi.wikiquote is too small to have any bureaucrat now--Nick1915 - all you want 09:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Mayur@hiwiktionary

Status:    Not done

Hi i have gained consensus regarding bureacrat and sysop access, kindly update my status if i am eligible--Mayur 05:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Not done hi.wikt is too small to have any bureaucrat now--Nick1915 - all you want 09:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Mayur@hiwikibooks

Status:    Not done

Hi i have gained consensus regarding bureacrat and sysop access, kindly update my status if i am eligible--Mayur 05:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Not done hi.wikibooks is too small to have any bureaucrat now--Nick1915 - all you want 09:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Rohit Rawat@hiwikiquote

Status:    Not done

Hi, I am a sysop on hiwikipedia and a very active contributor on hiwiktionary and hiwikiquote. As many Wikimedia projects in the Hindi language are lagging far behind projects in other languages because of lack of available tools because of which there are no to very less active users on these projects and hiwikiquote is one of them. Therefore, I am requesting for adminship on hiwikiquote so that proper tools may be provided and drastic changes need to be done on hiwikiquote which are not possible withour admin rights like making better interface, deleting useless categories and quotes, renaming of quotes, and providing better editing tools which may make it easier to edit in Hindi. As I said there are no active users on hiwikiquote so it is not possible to get support on local community talk page. But as I'm already an admin on hiwikipedia and I have made significant contributions on hiwikipedia and hiwiktionary I think I am eligible for this post. Thank you. रोहित रावत 05:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. Notwithstanding temporary sysop status for 3 months as per the local voting would be OK. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Not done hi.wikiquote is too small to have any bureaucrat now--Nick1915 - all you want 10:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ou0430@zhwikinews

Status:    Done

4 support votes. Vote end at 1/2/2011 . I am a sysop of zhwn. Waihorace 01:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Done by current bureaucrat in zhwn--Alex S.H. Lin 09:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Bhawani Gautam Rhk@newiktionary

Status:    Not done

i have gained six votes from local community to become a sysop & bureaucrat, pl. grant.-Bhawani 09:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:21, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Already declined previously. Not done. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Sir, But you have given temporary adm-ship only, even i gained community consensus. Thanks--Bhawani 15:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Bhawani Gautam Rhk@newikibooks

Status:    Not done

Hi, There are few active users due the lack of phonetic Devanagari tools, i want to build the same, and now I gained the support from local community, please grant me sysop & bureaucrat flag. - Bhawani 09:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

It is longstanding practice not to grant bureaucrat access to those who do not gain at least 15 votes in favour. Other stewards are welcome to comment. -- Dferg ☎ talk 18:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I agree, in a small project like this every request could be easily fulfilled by stewards--Nick1915 - all you want 18:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
So, Not done hi.wikibooks is too small to have any bureaucrat now--Nick1915 - all you want 10:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

CheckUser access

rsocol@ro.wiki

Status:    Done

I will send an identification document by email. Rsocol 07:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Per CheckUser policy#Access to CheckUser it is required to gain at least 25 votes in favour. I only see 14/0/1; thus policy requirements are not met at this time and access cannot be turned on, even if identified. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. We've reached 25 votes in favor. — AdiJapan 05:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 On hold, awaiting ID. -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Identification done. Rsocol 09:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Done--Nick1915 - all you want 12:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Vigorous action@jawiki

Status:    Done

Please CheckUser access, discussion of local election on Japanese Wikipedia. He/She Identification sent to the Foundation (identified diff). Thank you。 --Carkuni 07:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 12:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

欅@jawiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please CheckUser access, discussion of local election on Japanese Wikipedia. I send identification information to User:欅 via an e-mail message. Thank you. --Carkuni 15:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 On hold, awaiting ID. -- Dferg ☎ talk 12:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment Comment I report that the identification was completed. --Chatama 22:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Done --FiliP ██ 12:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Oversight access

Keegan@en.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Thank you. Risker 23:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 00:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Kamix@fawiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
As local crat , i just closed this RFO as successful so per the above link grant the oversight access to the mentioned user , he has been notified about identification procedure but yet not identified Mardetanha talk 18:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 On hold awaiting for ID --Nick1915 - all you want 18:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Done--Nick1915 - all you want 21:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Removal of access

Swedish Wikipedia

On the Swedish Wikipedia, all sysops/crats/OS/CU are elected for one year. Policy document.

There is a possibility to be reelected, but the following users choose to not ask for a new period.

MoRsE@svwikipedia
Status:    Done

Sysop flag should be removed. -- Lavallen 19:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 20:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Caesar@svwikipedia
Status:    Done

Checkuser and oversight flags should be removed. Sysop flag shall be kept. --MagnusA 09:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 09:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Greverod@svwikipedia
Status:    Done

Sysop flag should be removed. - Lavallen 08:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Tetraedycal@svwikipedia
Status:    Done

Sysop flag should be removed. - Lavallen 08:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Vivo@svwikipedia
Status:    Done

Sysop flag should be removed. - Lavallen 08:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Adler.fa@fawiki

Status:    Not done

Please remove my Sysop, Oversight and Checkuser accesses. Please note that according to oversight and check user policy, the access of the other Oversighter, User:ظهیری and the other user checker, User:Huji, should be suspended too, until second users for both two accesses are elected in the local wiki (I don't take any responsibility of those two actions from now on.). I'm so sorry that I have to leave wikimedia projects and I wish you all the bests. 16:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm also sorry that you're leaving the projects Huji 17:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Stewards: Please wait for further notice until proceding the request. --თოგო (D) 17:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Thogo. A discussion is undergoing on the local admin mailing list. I personally hope Adler.fa changes his decision. However, I just want to clarify that he has the right to decide not to delay this action. In that case, no matter how much I want him not to leave the project, I wouldn't delay completing his request if I was a Steward Huji 21:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
According to Laaknor, the request is on hold until two days Mjbmr Talk 21:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes. It's a bit of a trouble for the project as it will leave the project without local CU and OS, so we must make sure that there is no other possibility. --თოგო (D) 22:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Meanwhile, fa.wiki adminship and some other users have convinced me that it is not the best decision. Therefore I kindly ask you to ignore my previous request and let me continue with those accesses. Here my deepest appreciations go to Huji and Mardetanha for their kind support. Adler.fa 11:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Then I'm marking your request as Not done. --Mercy 11:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Andibrunt@dewikipedia

Status:    Done

Please, remove my admin status on the German wikipedia. If I ever want to become an admin again, I will start a formal candidacy. --Andibrunt 13:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

We are requested to wait a bit but will do that as soon as possible. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Why wait? --Andibrunt 23:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Is there any reason that prevents us to fulfill this request? -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
We once decided to wait at least 24 hours if a user wants to give his tools voluntarily back if he was put under pressure e.g. because of having done a possible mistake or being upset about a single issue. We had some trouble when people changed their minds within a few hours and claimed to get their tools back. I do not think that this will happen here. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. The sysop flag has been removed. -- Dferg ☎ talk 16:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Thx. --Andibrunt 16:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

galoric@frwiki

Status:    Done

Local policy states that administrators that have been inactive for more than 6 months should have their sysop access removed. Thanks, --Elfix 20:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 20:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Nirmos@svWP

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop flag on svWP. Thanks, Nirmos 05:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Arne List@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Cynewulf@enwiktionary

Status:    Done

Self-confirmation and no activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Done per user agreement. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Williamsayers79@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Brion VIBBER@enwiktionary

Status:    Done

Self-confirmation and no activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Was already done by Mike.lifeguard 2 years ago. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Psy guy@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Tawker@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

Self-confirmation and no activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Kappa@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Medellia@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Alhen@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Jeffqyzt@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Kevin Rector@enwiktionary

Status:    Not done

No activity for over a year. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Just noticed that English Wiktionary bureaucrats can remove the sysop & bureaucrat bit from any user. There's now no need for steward intervention anylonger. This should be solved entirelly locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Electron@pl.wikisource

Status:    Done

I request a removal of sysop rights from the account of Electron on the pl.Wikisource project in accordance with the Community vote. --Teukros 20:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 20:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ninane@nl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like my local sysop/administrator rights (moderator) to be removed. --Ninane 13:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 14:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Fenix@sv.wikipedia

Status:    Done

According to the policy of sv.wikipedia, administrators are to be re-elected each year. Fenix hasn't responded to whether he would like to continue as admin or not and since his rights expired in January, his admin rights should be removed. --Poxnar 17:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The user-rights expired january 31. Link to last election in Febr 2010. -- Lavallen 11:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Chunshek@zhwikinews

Status:    Not done

Non-active since 2006 and discussion to remove the access for these users. --Waihorace 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

This have been done before. --Waihorace 02:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Ffootballchu@zhwikinews

Status:    Not done

Non-active since 2006 and discussion to remove the access for these users. --Waihorace 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

This have been done before. --Waihorace 02:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

SB Johnny@enwikiversity

Status:    Not done

This is just a filing of Bureaucrat removal and not the addition Administrator removal. Wikiversity allows for non-Bureaucrat closure. Policy for recalling administrators gives seven days (25 Jan 2011 00:12 - 2 Feb 2011 at 00:12 UTC) and says that there must be consensus to support, not oppose. 70% of responders opposed a Bureaucrat, who would need a super majority to support or 21 more people to support than supported. --Ottava Rima (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Comment: Wikiversity:Bureaucratship is a proposed policy and not yet adopted by the community, so it is a bit disingenuous to make claims about "super majority" or process. Wikiversity:Community_Review_Policy makes no mention of a specific duration for discussions, but instead states that "Community reviews should be closed when it is clear that there is a consensus, or when it becomes clear that a consensus will not be reached." While we are on the topic it might be instructive to review the discussions at Wikiversity talk:Community Review. --mikeu talk 16:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Further comment - I note that the "proposed" policy has been just that for 10 months now without having been made actual policy. As such it would appear that it is being "used" in this case by someone who "uses" anything they can find. I'm sure stewards will be cautious at getting caught up in yet another of these less than clear issues. --Herby talk thyme 16:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Herby, I already pointed out it was -proposed-. There is no policy requiring a Bureaucrat to file a Bureaucrat removal. That is all that is necessary. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Note - Mu301 is a Bureaucrat who gave SB Johnny both adminship and bureaucrat rights without community discussion after being inactive and coming back only to help out a friend (on 11 August 2010 [5]). Ottava Rima (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
The Custodianship policy does not mention Community Review but gives a clear seven days, a seven day period you ignored when you submitted a removal of me against consensus. This is the only removal policy and it says: "then a new seven day community discussion can be initiated to establish if there is community consensus in support". Both were followed and SB Johnny doesn't meet the requirement. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Given that you have stated that your request above is for "removal of Bureaucrat status only" and "not the addition Administrator removal" I find it very odd that you are trying to cite the Custodian (ie. WV Admninistrator) policy. --mikeu talk 18:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Well, under that policy SB Johnny's adminship would be removed and since Bureaucratship needs a higher level of community trust, then ipso facto, the Bureaucratship would be removed. There is clear consensus to remove either way, and seven days is standard. I find it odd how you are suddenly concerned about process when you desysopped one person without discussion, gave privileges to another without discussion, and closed another removal process after 3 days when the community unanimously said the whole thing was completely wrong, abused, and without any legitimacy. Your bias and personal interest is clear here and shows a willingness to abuse your position while ignoring what is best for Wikiversity. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • The bureaucrat and administrator rights were granted unilaterally by Mu301, without any kind of community discussion. The rights should be removed. Diego Grez return fire 18:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • This is all continued disruption by Ottava. Diego Grez doesn't seem to understand the custom of allowing re-opping on request for voluntary resignations, and decisions about that are the province of 'crats. The cited discussion has been independently closed as no consensus for removal, and was protected as closed by a 'crat when Ottava revert warred over it. There are multiple seriously wikilawyered arguments presented by Ottava, in contradiction to the plain language of policy, and in contradiction to custom. In order to claim consensus for removal, Ottava must discount all comments after his artificial and rigid "7 day deadline," and, as usual, when he doesn't get what he wants, he makes up or dredges up whatever dirt or "inconsistency" he can find. There is also, if anyone needs it, a review of the voting at [6]. There were canvassed votes, including, by the way, Diego Grez, evidence provided on request.
  • Wikiversity is handling this locally. I supported desysopping there, but closed the Community Review as "no consensus" because that was obvious, as a minimum (it could be argued there was consensus supporting SBJ), seeking to avoid further disruption. Ottava reverted, etc. --Abd 18:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
You were de-admin because you have no ability to judge things appropriately and you were given adminship by abusive Crats that the community has universally rejected and want to be removed from Wikiversity. You are also promoting and aiding a cross-wiki sock puppet in the form of KBlott and helping him wage war on Wikipedia, so your actions aren't the best. Ottava Rima talk) 18:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Q.E.D. Above, with the filing, Ottava gave a diff to the relevant Community Review, but did not reveal that this was to a week-old revision. He obviously hoped that a steward might not notice. This is the revision as closed. (The page is currently protected by a 'crat, as closed by an independent sysop, due to Ottava revert warring over the close.) --Abd 19:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Seven days is seven days. Votes that came up to 6 days after the end are never counted. Even if you do add in 3 more supports, that is still less than he 23 necessary for him to be retained. The page is currently protected by a person who gave SB Johnny ops without consensus and has a 3 year long track record of abuse, lies, and other problems. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

There are some conversations going on on en.wv in regards to reforming our processes. Hopefully those will be fruitful and will spare the readers here of future drama spillovers. --SB_Johnny talk 22:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done per local discussion, no community consensus. Please make your requests here just once every problem has been solved locally. Thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 12:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
There is clear local consensus. Policy makes it clear that he would need support to stay, which he does not have. You cannot just make things up like that, Nick1915. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

fm790@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per confirm edit on user's page. Popo le Chien 20:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Nerd@de.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per request on Adminstrator request's page. Sargoth 21:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Niels@nl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my bureaucrat / admin access. Confirmation here if necessary. Thanks in advance for your help. Niels 00:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, thank you for your work! LeinaD (t) 00:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks LeinaD! Niels 00:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Chery@huwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Chery has met the requirements of automatic deadmination because of inactivity. Please remove his admin access. Bináris tell me 14:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 15:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Bináris tell me 15:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Mosesofmason@zhwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Mosesofmason has been desysop according to a community poll. Please remove his sysop access. --PhiLiP 14:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

And may all the open proxies in the world be released upon thou. Operation Pain Relief + Bot des Nations + 萬國駮173.245.84.125 19:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

martinp23@enwiki_p

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Sadly, for some time now I have been unable to contribute enough time to Wikipedia. In the interests of security and avoiding user confusion when people request me to wade into "drama", it's best all around for me to not have the sysop flag, at least until I have more time and can use the local wiki's procedures to regain it. Cheers for the experience :). --Martinp23 19:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Removed tnx for all efforts Mardetanha talk 19:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Addihockey10@bewikipedia

Status:    Not done

Please remove the status of the Temp Sysop. --Maksim L. 18:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Comment Comment Addihockey10 already asked for removal and was done by Dungodung a few days ago. -- Màñü飆¹5 talk es 21:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Not done 'cause it's already Done --Nick1915 - all you want 21:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Anathema@de.wikiquote

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thank you. -- Paulis 09:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done Laaknor 10:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Biblelover@de.wikiquote

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thank you. -- Paulis 09:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done Laaknor 10:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Timt@de.wikiquote

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thank you. -- Paulis 09:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done Laaknor 10:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Thomas@de.wikiquote

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thank you. -- Paulis 09:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done Laaknor 10:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Trublu@de.wikiquote

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Thank you. -- Paulis 09:55, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done Laaknor 10:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

MapiVanPelt@it.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please, remove my sysop flag, thanks. --MapiVanPelt 17:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, grazie per il lavoro svolto!Nick1915 - all you want 18:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Grazie a te, Nick! --MapiVanPelt 18:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

ThomasV@oldwikisource

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my bureaucrat flag. I want to keep my sysop flag. --ThomasV 11:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Aramgar@lawikisource

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove Armamgar's sysop flag. The user in question has commented and, somewhat snidely, confirmed his retirement. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 11:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 12:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Capitão Pirata Bruxo@pt.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

I want to have all my flags removed. Thanks. --Capitão Pirata BruxoTalk page 21:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 21:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Beany@nl.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

I'm can't combine my study with Wikipedia so I'm retiring Beany 18:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your help and good luck with your studies.--Mercy 19:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Jack Merridew@en.wikisource

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Terima kasih --Jack Merridew 18:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your work. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@enwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@arwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my checkuser and sysop rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@mediawikiwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop and coder rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. Please note that I did not removed 'coder' rights from your account since that can't be done from meta. Ask a local bureaucrat. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@testwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my bureaucrat, povwatch and sysop rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. I couldn't remove the 'povwatch' flags neither by assigning myself local steward rights there. The flag no longer appears at the Special:Userrights page. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@wikimania2008wiki

{{sr-closed|done|text=

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@flaggedrevs_labswikimedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop and editor rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. Editor rights couldn't be removed. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Meno25@de_labswikimedia

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Not done

Please remove my reviewer rights. Thanks. --Meno25 05:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Can be done locally. -- Dferg ☎ talk 09:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

SPQRobin@ruewiki

Please give me temporary sysop + import rights on the new ruewiki to import pages from Incubator. Thank you, SPQRobin (talk) 08:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Done, just say when you're finished. Laaknor 09:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
You can remove my rights. Thank you, SPQRobin (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Done. LeinaD (t) 16:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

DerHexer@kshwiki

Status:    Done
Done -- let us know once done --Jyothis 17:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Removed. -- Dferg ☎ talk 14:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Dictuser@kmwiktionary

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Not done
Have you asked locally? Laaknor 16:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
There is no local bureaucrat on kmwikt. I just need it for Temporary 3 months. Thanks --Dictuser 16:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
You still need to ask on a local village pump or other page, and wait for around a week so others can comment on your request. Not done for now.Laaknor 16:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

schoolcraftT@commons

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Not done
Not done While you're not clear on if you're asking for en.wikipedia or commons, both projects have bureaucrats, so stewards can not grant you temporary sysop status. Thanks anyway. Kylu 21:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Waihorace@zhwn

Status:    Not done

A steward give me 3 months temp sysop and now I want to extand it since second vote has been complated.Waihorace 04:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

your access expires in 2 months... just wait until March please. Thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 11:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Junaidpv@sawikipedia

Status:    Done

Previously I had applied for edit interface right at sa.wikipedia to enable transliteration tool there (Steward_requests/Permissions#Junaidpv_.40_sa.wikipedia.org). As there is no right like 'edit interface' at sa.wikipedia, I change my request and now apply for temporary admin right. I will help the wiki to integrate the transliteration tool there. Thank you Junaidpv 06:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Granted temp sysop rights till Feb 5, 2010. The access could be revoked earlier if you complete the implementation before that. --Jyothis 14:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

JenVan@ruwikibooks

Status:    Done

See also User talk:Kylu#JenVan@ruwikibooks. Thanks! JenVan (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Done.Jusjih 03:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
To be more specific, Done through 2011-02-10 while Mardetanha emailed me that permanent flag does not seem ready.Jusjih 03:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Reder@roa-tarawikipedia

Status:    Done

Reder 02:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Done temp access granted until 21-02-2011. Regards -- @lestaty discuţie 00:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 08:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

hanberke@tk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please grant me 6-month temporary sysop status. I had four temporary terms up to now. I'm the only sysop there. Thanks in advance. Hanberke 11:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Done Extended for six months from today. While you're there, would you mind setting up some of the community pages please? I mean tk:Wikipediýa:Oba güzeri and the two content portal pages in the navigation box primarily. Thanks! Kylu 17:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 09:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Please extend my 6-month temporary sysop status for another 6 months.Hanberke 11:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Done Extended six months from today. As above, please consider setting up some of the pages linked from the navigation box. Your administration request page, for instance, is hard to find unless you're both looking for it and familiar with MediaWiki. Kylu 17:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 09:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

2011 Ombudsman Committee

The following users have been appointed to the Ombudsman Committee and need to have their rights suspended for their term:

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done.
Please check, user has Oversight permission that was *not* removed. --M/ 00:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
It's my view that oversight permission should not be removed. It wasn't removed in my case last year. FloNight's OV permission should be retained, or turned back on if it's off. ++Lar: t/c 01:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

The following users have finished their terms on the Ombudsman Committee and will need their rights restored:

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
For the record, my rights should be
  • Admin, CU on en:wp
  • Admin, crat, OV, CU on Commons.
and no others. I gave up all my Meta rights, and it is asserted that I was not reconfirmed as a steward. ++Lar: t/c 16:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
OK, that means that only CU@commons needed to be restored, which I've just Done. --FiliP ██ 16:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
Done. --M/ 00:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Additional discussion: The announcement of the new Ombudsman Committee is here: [8]. Please let me know if there is additional information needed. Thank you!! Christine (WMF) 00:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

All done, please check Oversight permission on en:User:FloNight.
Thank you, M/ 00:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! However, i seem to have made an error. I requested Lar to have steward permissions restored, however he was not reconfirmed as a steward, and should not have had that bit replaced. Can it be removed again? Thank you and again, I'm sorry for the confusion! Christine (WMF) 00:37, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
don't worry, it's not a big problem Done :)--Nick1915 - all you want 00:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I've also set and removed global permission accordingly. --M/ 00:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you again! Last change, sorry! FloNight does have OS permissions on en.wiki and will need to also have that suspended for her term on the Committee. Okay. I think that's it this time. Thank you again, again! Christine (WMF) 01:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Done--Nick1915 - all you want 01:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing the recent changes it looks like one permission has not been removed? If you look at the global rights it seems Palnatoke's rights from last year have not been removed. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

And that is Done now. --FiliP ██ 09:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks :) --Herby talk thyme 12:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment Comment Mwpnl was appointed to the commission though nobody has granted him yet the global ombudsman permission. I've asked Christine if it can be added or not. -- Dferg ☎ talk 21:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Oversight removal?

Discussion moved to the talk page. --Dferg 21:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Discuss this.

Temporary importer access

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Huji 00:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Please report back when you're done. --FiliP ██ 12:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm done; please remove my importer access. Thanks a lot Huji 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Removed. --FiliP ██ 22:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

user name@Phased_array_ultrasonics

The following request is closed: not done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Not done

Hello, I would like to translate this page in french. I try to read the notice but I lost myself on the documentation. I just want to know how I can translate this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phased_array_ultrasonics To improve my knowledge in wikipedia editing and creating documents. Thanks a lot Xavier Faure

Hello, This is not a valid request. -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 16:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Why this is not a valid request. -- User Xavier Faure 20:45, 15 February 2011
The request doesn't pertain to user group rights, so this is really the wrong page. Have you looked at en:Wikipedia:Translation and fr:Projet:Traduction yet? You can ask for help on the discussion pages there. Have a nice day! Kylu 21:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Cheers!-bot@viwiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

Please grant import rights to Cheers!-bot@viwiki. I'm a sysop from viwiki. Thank you. minhhuy*= 09:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Qickly, please!... --minhhuy*= 12:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Done.Jusjih 15:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Theo10011@strategywiki

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done

I would like to request import rights on strategy wiki. I am a b-crat there and need import rights to import some templates for regular tasks. The community is not that active anymore, and I need some templates for routine maintenance tasks. Thank you. Theo10011 22:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 22:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2011-02&oldid=24926780"