Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-12

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Requests

TGever@zh.wikipedia

Hello @SCP-2000:. Despite the accounts above may be globally locked, there was a sleeper check requested by the local community as well. I'm not sure if the request should be withdrawn yet. Also, based on the evidence presented in the community, I'm suspecting that there may be a mocker since Albertpda primarily vandalize on enwiki while none of the users listed above have accounts in enwiki.--20:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Just my personal curious. Thanks for your answer. --SCP-2000 23:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed QBFG, QBSR, 摩尔上校, TGever, Jebat2
  • Stale Dustyveil

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Acanchang@zh.wikipedia

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Mingming012, AndyFEIChiEn, JasmineKEIKEI, YLOT1, Ylot.chairman
  • Stale Acanchang

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

thank you. 桐生ここ (talk) 12:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Cao Mingshuo@zh.wikipedia

Both accounts are Likely Likely to each other. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Corresdonpence@ukwikibooks

Comment Comment@Renvoy:Checkuser is not able to check the relationships between IPs and accounts. --14:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
@Timmyboger:, as I see relationship between IP and Sergio9416 was already confirmed by ukwiki checkuser w:uk:Вікіпедія:Запити_на_перевірку_користувачів/2021#Масова_вставка_копівіо. But still I am interested in relationship between remaining accounts.--Renvoy (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Mfcker & Corresdonpence
  •  Confirmed Sergio9416 & Kgrejwgherer
  • Likely Likely to each other. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

鴻昇@zh.wikipedia

  • Unlikely Unlikely 鴻昇 and Jibiimcat

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

潘森之王@zh.wikipedia

  • Unrelated Unrelated between all accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Grilando@es.wikipedia

enwiki, commons, simple, and eswiki all have their own checkusers, so there is nothing stewards can do to action this request. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Lovecn0428@zh.wikipedia

I won't be processing this, I will probably leave this to Sotiale, but "similar editing behavior" is going to have to be explained a little better to justify a check. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I plan to deal with this after reviewing it today. The above request is the same. Before that, I want you to check what Amanda pointed out. --Sotiale (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello AmandaNP and @Sotiale:, I'm currently awaiting a response from the local community. Thanks for letting me know. --17:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale:After some more discussion in the local community, this request is withdrawn. Sorry for the inconvenience. --15:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Atpsy@zh.wikipedia

This will be handled by me tomorrow. --Sotiale (talk) 13:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Hackanorak, Incomeharp, Leopardflusher, Mastweaver, Midnight1969, Nationsquartz, Quizzedcovens, Sinkerplayers, Atpsy

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Lurehuke@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Lurehuke, 天寿結び, 钮祜禄甄嬛加强版, 泉水之殇, Otakelick

From a technical point of view. I'm not sure they are 冏, so it will be necessary to investigate their behavior patterns in more detail. --Sotiale (talk) 01:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

ドデカイラーメン@ja.wikivoyage

All accounts are Unrelated Unrelated. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Syrupibis@zh.wikipedia

Oh, I didn't think much of it, but I think this case is going to be very interesting. This will be handled by me in an hour. --Sotiale (talk) 09:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

From a technical point of view. Excellent fish tank! --Sotiale (talk) 10:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I utilized {{for}} so as to make the names clicky. Feeling sorry for whoever are gonna block these. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 13:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Vami@eo.wikt & Vami@meta

Not done. I can't get from your statement why the users you presented are claimed to be related to 1Goldberg2, and I wonder why there is no explanation for Amikeco. If you claim that these are the same users, and if you are claiming that they are socking, the evidence must be clearly presented. If you would like to request a block or other action against their behavior, visit here, not here. --Sotiale (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Mocd@id.wikipedia

Please provide diffs that show this user is the same user as requested in the box at the top of the page. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
idwiki has 5 checkusers. Is there any reason why you can't contact them locally? --Sotiale (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
QBSR has not been checked by local stewards in id.wp and QBSR has been blocked globally. Mocd has also done some type of similar edit, so I think it's better to also take a global action, if my guess is true. Meanwhile, I will also contact the local CU in id.wp. Regards. Medelam (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Talking about diffs, I give the page of w:id:Pembicaraan:Tim nasional sepak bola Indonesia where both accounts did some discussion. Regards. Medelam (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
What I mean is, as long as there are local checkusers on idwiki, we can't run checkuser directly, so they have to be handled locally. We can't handle this unless they have a very special reason to not be able to handle this case. --Sotiale (talk) 11:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: ran a CU, obvious sock. Enough to merit a global lock, seeing QBSR's track record. Regards, dwadieff 11:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

@David Wadie Fisher-Freberg: Firstly, the above account/user was not previously blocked in idwiki. They still have the right to edit in idwiki. It is not valid that you blocked an user just because they are related to an account that is globally locked. A global lock is to prevent an account from editing certain projects where they are not allowed to edit; it doesn't mean to ban that user who used that account from editing all projects. Mocd (talk) 13:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

idwiki is one of the Wikimedia wikis. If you want to take back your editing rights, ask for a review of the lock, rather than using bizarre excuses. --Sotiale (talk) 13:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Chatgatto@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Yuwingwah, Sokalok, Catuscattus, Chatgatto

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Πρόεδρος@el.wikipedia

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Likely Likely Γατούληθ, Gib Damen, Βιολιστής, Kunrai, Πρόεδρος, Anderena, 47 GC, Mamenem
  • Although the above accounts are technically related to each other, it is recommended to check the pattern of the LTA when taking action against them.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Sotiale.—Ah3kal (talk) 11:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Supermind@am.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Ledjachew, KZebegna, 1922 hits
  • Unrelated Unrelated The Supermind

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

2A02:17D0:461:A900:8061:3E80:AF4C:CA74@ru.wikinews

Noting that this was originally posted in an archive page, and I moved it here. Vermont (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Not done. @Reda Kerbouche: If you want to report this to T&S, they can investigate this on their own. When reporting to them, share your needs with them. If it is appropriate, they will accept. --Sotiale (talk) 09:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)