Steward requests/Checkuser/2024-04

Requests

Qqqyyy@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

文統 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

T9453 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

陋庵 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mydjsound (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Lesson1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mapayna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Qqqyyy

Reason(s): Compare with Special:Diff/25691887#Qqqyyy@zh.wikipedia, account 1 appears to be a sock of hoax-maker Qqqyyy. Please also check for sockpuppet accounts and underlying IP addresses per WP:CUP#1, and block any IPs if necessary. LuciferianThomas 10:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Popoli110, 文統, T9453, Rocksting

---

•  Confirmed 2023-07

--Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Diraged3@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Biblbrocs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

星野源夢 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Diraged3

Reason(s): Compare with 星野源夢 group, similar editing patterns after B gamed their way to autoconfirmed. LuciferianThomas 10:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Biblbrocs, Diraged3, 星野源夢

---

• They're using VPNs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Jasonc9710@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Jasonc9710 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CharlesJ2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Knowledge2761 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Charle2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Jasonc9710

Reason(s): Jasonc9710,CharlesJ2024 and Knowledge2761 edit the same article with exactly the same edit summary and same typo in content. Jasonc9710 and CharlesJ2024 was created within 24 hours. Charle2024 claimed Jasonc9710=Knowledge2761=CharlesJ2024 in Charle2024's user page in the same day of local discussion. Ask for checking if Charle2024 is sock of above three or not and if there any sleeper sock. Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

In relation to this, could you explain why it is so urgent that the request is made without the input of local clerks, or whether there is reason to distrust them? --Sotiale (talk) 04:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I would endorse the request on the basis of their editing patterns. As to why they decided to directly ping other users for a community consensus request (which I don't even see an obvious consensus) and not even try to ping clerks if it is any urgent is really not understandable. Do please proceed with the checkuser though. LuciferianThomas 10:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Even with the clerk team's consent, this request does not have a proper SPI link nor can it confirm the discussion. I request that the requester provide a good reason, otherwise this request should be closed. --Sotiale (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sotiale: I think Cmsth11126a02 has accidentally put the link of the deprecated HAM as the link of SPI, and I have just fixed it. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Sanmosa _Outdia 10:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Group 1: Knowledge6127, CosmoPolice, Wikijanedia, Knowledge2761, Jasonc9710, CharlesJ2024, KiraGcn
•  Confirmed Group 2: GGbondZeroAD, GGbondZeroOO, GGbondZero

---

• Likely Group 1 and 2
• Unlikely Charle2024 and Group 1, 2

---

• Some users are using VPNs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Mahbubslt@bn.wikibooks

Status:    Done

List of users

Mahbubslt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Ahmedbnp (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Isla-org (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: b:bn:উইকিবই:অপসারণ প্রস্তাবনা#সিলেটি ভাষা শিক্ষা/আধুনিক সিলেটি

Reason(s): An article on Wikibooks is under discussion for deletion due to suspected self-promotion and original research. A newly registered account has commented in favor of keeping the article in its first edit, following a comment from the page creator, Mahbubslt. I suspect they may be the same user, given the similarity in their writing styles. The creator might be attempting to manipulate the deletion process by using multiple accounts. Please note that Mahbubslt previously created an account for his organization, which was blocked for violating the username policy. —MdsShakil (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@MdsShakil: Mahbubslt and Isla-org are  Confirmed along with Tahercoxbd. Ahmedbnp is technically Unrelated to either of these accounts. Other than that, no additional sockpuppets found. EPIC (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. —MdsShakil (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Sika890827@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Sika890827 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Lion0622 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Sika890827

Reason(s): Both accounts listed above holds highly similar editing behavior in articles related to an airport in Taichung, Taiwan. Further investigation has concluded with additional suspected IP socks found. A sleeper check is therefore requested. Thanks in advance. $\int$（☎） 22:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• Unlikely

--Sotiale (talk) 09:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

離心力青蛙@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

閃亮的西瓜 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

黑暗榮耀 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/離心力青蛙#2024年4月1日 (Permalink)

Reason(s): Similar to previous socks, both users removed content from multiple movie-related articles, particularly those that include lists (with significant overlap in the articles targeted and neither provided edit summaries). 黑暗榮耀 also !voted delete in an XFD nominated by 閃亮的西瓜. A sleeper check was requested. Thanks! --94rain ^Talk 07:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 黑暗榮耀, 閃亮的, 閃亮的西瓜

--Sotiale (talk) 09:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

四条河原町@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

四条河原町 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

RikkenMinseito (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/四条河原町#2024年4月5日 (Permalink)

Reason(s): RikkenMinseito registered within a day after 四条河原町 got blocked and quickly gained autoconfirmed status to edit semi-protected articles related to Taiwan under Japanese rule and engaged in edit warring, similar to what 四条河原町 did. Both users tend to remove warnings left on their talk pages. Thanks! --94rain ^Talk 08:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Okunohosomiti, RikkenMinseito, 四条河原町

--Sotiale (talk) 09:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Rat Rembrandt@pl.wikiquote

Status:    Done

List of users

Rat Rembrandt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Trevorr Reznik (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Visorak Roporak (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Toa Mahri Kongu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: link 1/link 2

Reason(s): For some time, once in a while someone creates an account on Polish Wikiquote and immediately begins to vandalise. Is it possible to confirm if these are really the same person and if so, somehow stop them? (note that the accounts above are only some of the accounts that showed such behaviour, there are more) Swam pl (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@Swam pl: Those accounts are all Likely to  Confirmed. I also found a bunch of other accounts that are all blocked, except for User:Vvgyvhvhv which remains unblocked (though hasn't edited recently). – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @Ajraddatz: is there anything we can do to prevent further vandalism from this person? Swam pl (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

The abuse is coming from a few specific IP ranges; unfortunately, under the Access to Nonpublic Personal Data Policy I don't think there is any acceptable way for me to communicate those ranges to you. Are any of your admins on pl.wikiquote checkusers on pl.wikipedia? I should be able to communicate the info to them. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately no, pl.wikipedia currently has two checkusers ([1]) and neither of them is an admin on pl.wikiquote ([2]). Swam pl (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

A shame. I'm following up on my end about this, hopefully there is some way - I'll reach out to the local admins on pl.wikiquote if/once I can. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Great, thank you! Swam pl (talk) 23:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Science2023@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Science2023 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Elmaztu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Sevda K (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

EA11 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): The article "Sevda Qasimova" was created by Elmaztu on azwiki but later worked on by Science2023 and this user attempted to recover the article after deletion. The initial edit by Science2023 is also on Elmaztu's user page: user removed the information about Sevda Qasimova from the page. Sevda K's user page also contains information about Sevda Qasimova, and user created and worked on an article about Rasim Qasimov on ruwiki, and also worked on the article about the same person on azwiki, where Science2023 also have significiant edits. The article about Rasim Qasimov on azwiki has been created by EA11, so I also requested for this user.

Sura Shukurlu (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Sevda K, Science2023
• Stale Elmaztu, EA11

--Sotiale (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Jasonc9710@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Jasonc9710 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Ilovekissanime (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CharlesJ2024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Jasonc9710

Reason(s): More users found similar to the editing patterns of the Steward requests/Checkuser/2024-04#Jasonc9710@zh.wikipedia group. A check is requested to confirm if the users are related, and to ask for a CU block on related IPs per zh:WP:CUP#1. LuciferianThomas 03:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Ilovekissanime

Ilovekissanime is  Confirmed. No action is currently possible, but I will take necessary action soon. Unfortunately, there don't seem to be any new ones. --Sotiale (talk) 05:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Wetrace@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Wetrace (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Wetrace

Reason(s): There is reasonable suspicion that the user has been editing logged-out, but I do not find the evidence sufficient to immediately determine them to be the same person, so a check is requested to see if this user has been editing while logged out. LuciferianThomas 03:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I believe you are aware that in order for this request to be successful, you will need to fully explain the evidence or, if it is not to be made public, send me an email with the rationale. Could you please do that? --Sotiale (talk) 05:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

To say the least that would probably suffice for a CU: the user is suspected to have repeatedly removed all pages under certain contentious categories using IP sockpuppets. LuciferianThomas 13:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

We won't be able to help with this one - we cannot give information that would connect an account to an IP address. If the user is suspected to be logging out to vandalize, your best option would be to address the IP vandalism with rangeblocks (as appropriate) to prevent further abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

As per previous enquiries, it appears that stewards can indeed tell us whether a user has been editing logged out without telling us which IP they used. They could be editing logged out using IPs not on the local SPI report. I do see this conflict of understanding between various stewards, so while I acknowledge your input, I would ask that you also discuss with Sotiale regarding previous similar requests. LuciferianThomas 15:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

In response to zh:Special:diff/82255230, I will be providing my own input here:

Recent edits in zh:Category:對法輪功的批評 and its enwiki corresponding page en:Category:Criticism_of_Falun_Gong (by removing the link to the category from pages to the point where the category is emptied and therefore qualifies for speedy delete) have sparked suspicion in local user Wetrace engaging in logout editing. Despite Wetrace attempts to redirect the attention to the creator of the category 重庆轨交18 in the discussion, multiple local users, including a local admin Ericliu1912 encourages such check for logout edits. A suggestion has indicated a potential Unlikely based on the corresponding geographic locations of the IPs, yet further discussion has hypothesized one the possibility of achieving such phenomenon through technical means should Wetrace is indeed engaging in abusing sockpuppets. Thanks in advance. $\int$（☎） 00:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I would like to make a note before I proceed with this. In principle, processing in SRCU should have a comparison target, and IP socking, as we call it, can generally be handled by a local checkuser, so it was an extremely exceptional processing due to the public nature of SRCU. Despite the many risks, I have handled this without violating the privacy policy. As you can see, refusing to handle IP socking on a large wiki like zhwiki is causing chaos there. In fact, I've found and covered several IP socking cases, including zhwiki's CCF incident. Therefore, I will process this request, but I will consider how to do it better than we do now, and at the same time minimize transparency issues and privacy issues. --Sotiale (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• There is no evidence whatsoever that they are IP socking or have other accounts.

--Sotiale (talk) 03:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Futurolog21@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Futurolog21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Leonid93 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Users' activity is entirely focused on the same articles: both users are engaged in activities on the Lady Slim article in languages they rarely edit, while Futurolog21 is the author of articles in all languages on this topic, and Leonid93 has repeatedly advocated against the deletion and in favor of the restoration of this article and has participated in discussions.[3], [4] Both users distort facts about my contributions in discussions in the same way and call me biased. There are also some articles with overlapping edits in azwiki, which I don't think is just a coincidence related to shared interest areas. [5] Futurolog21 was previously blocked for using a sock puppet account.--Sura Shukurlu (talk) 13:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Sotiale, hello. Can you please take a look? Thank you in advance. --Sura Shukurlu (talk) 13:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll review it soon. --Sotiale (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Futurolog21 and Leonid93

From a technical point of view. @Sura Shukurlu: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 14:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sotiale, what are the results for User Agent and Client Hints? Futurolog wrote on Leonid's talk page. I want to make sure if this is a fabricated discussion or not Nemoralis (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

SiuMai@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

空手而回 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

RookRookImPatrollerImBetterThanU (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/SiuMai

Reason(s): Another surfaced account 空手而回 from local LTA SiuMai. A sleeper check is requested; as usual, the last account listed is from previous check. Thanks in advance. --$\int$（☎） 08:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 空手而回 and 影子青蛙227

--Sotiale (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Ayten347@commons.wikimedia

Status:    Not done

List of users

Ayten347 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Futurolog21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

DragqueenLadySlim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): Another possible account of Futurolog21. This account uploaded a picture of Lady Slim to Commons and Futurolog has used this picture for several times. And also, Futurolog's another confirmed puppet account, DragqueenLadySlim, previously requested to change its name to Mirze347 and used "Mirze347" as a signature. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

In principle, we can't perform checkuser ourselves because commonswiki has their own checkuser team. Pragmatically, the last activity on the account was in 2021 and there will be no information remaining at this time. --Sotiale (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

The same photo was used for this global project before me - Futurolog21. Maybe the user in question posted that photo in connection with that project. Mirza also looked at that photo and placed those numbers at the end of his signature. Because he always followed Lady Slim and opened a user page with her name. Also, I have already declared that Mirza died and we used the same ip. OK, let it be that account in my name, but I don't know where this Leonid account came from. By replying to you, I also protest that the Leonid93 account has nothing to do with me. I don't think there is a 2nd profile that use my ip, so please check again. I only have one account linked to my laptop and my phone and I do all my editing mostly on my laptop and rarely on my phone when I'm not at home. i haven't other accounts and I repeat no one is using my ip. Futurolog21 (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:FE63:869E:B0E6:EAB8@en.wikinews

Status:    Not done

List of users

Burnsboyamazing (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

199.212.250.163 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:FE63:869E:B0E6:EAB8 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Wikinews:Admin action alerts, Wikinews:Requests for CheckUser

Reason(s): Suspected global lock evasion. Burnsboyamazing is the first and globally locked account.[6] I believe all four are the same individual. I requested a local Checkuser[7], but en.wikinews only has two and neither are currently active.[8] Thank you in advance. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I appreciate the effort you took to find them, but SRCU cannot be processed for several reasons; First, it is impossible to compare IPs and accounts and publicly declare the results. Second, if the evasion of the global lock is about IPs, you should request it to SRG. Third, it must be inactive to the extent that there is no response despite leaving a post on the checkuser's talkpage. --Sotiale (talk) 02:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for the response. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Quovadis11@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Quovadis11 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Drdrmtlgst (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Example

Reason(s): The Quovadis11 account has been created after the article created by the Drdrmtlgst has nominated for deletion, and this account has only edited that discussion. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed Drdrmtlgst and Quovadis11

--Sotiale (talk) 01:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Ubishini@ta.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Ubishini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Sanuthi Aahidya (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: ta.wiki has local policy same as en.wiki

Reason(s): Both users engaged in same vandal edits and vulgar comments. Also, I would request to check whether they already had any IDs. If so, I would prevent further vandalism and vulgar comments. AntanO 13:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

• Likely Sanuthi Aahidya and Ubishini

They may have accounts below;

• Naughty Nightingale (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
• Chilli Soonyam (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
• Veraswini (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)

--Sotiale (talk) 02:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Lalealievaa@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Lalealievaa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Taleh azimov (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Ayseleieva (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:az:VP:KUKLA

Reason(s): Adding same link with these ones. Checkuser is required to detect other edits that may have been overlooked and to find sleeper accounts. Bikar (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Please explain how they are similar to previously requested users. --Sotiale (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

• https://az.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PAŞA_Həyat&diff=prev&oldid=7588475
• https://az.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PAŞA_Həyat&diff=prev&oldid=7437021
• https://az.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PAŞA_Həyat&diff=prev&oldid=7435008 Bikar (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sotiale, please see previous request. This is probably same person who tries to add spam links. Check is required for same reasons with previous request. I added more users to request. You can also check this log. Nemoralis (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed
  • Ayseleieva (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Lalealievaa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Taleh azimov (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Nigar aluyeva (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Aysell hasanova18 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Lala hasanovaa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Aytac memmedova (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Muxtar hasanov (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Ayseellhasanovaa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Aysellss (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Aisel hasanovaa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Aysellhasanovaa (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Muxtarr hasanov (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Nemoralis (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Gayya 34@az.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Gayya 34 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Drdrmtlgst (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): It is a new account and the first and only edits are in this discussion. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be a need for this investigation. Is there the need for the investigation? --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

@Sotiale, this user has participated in the discussion. If it's proven to be a puppet account, the user's opinion on discussion will be disregarded and the account will be blocked. However, we need evidence to do this. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 14:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you please also check this one? :@İqra124 Sura Shukurlu (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

 Confirmed Drdrmtlgst, Quovadis11, İqra124 Possible Gayya 34. -- Amanda (she/her) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Njamu@bs.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

List of users

77.77.216.162 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log

Reason(s): My IP range is blocked on bs.wikipedia where I work mostly (and create valuable contribs btw). Some vandal used this address and removed a page’s content, which I reverted, but still admin blocked whole range 77.77.0.0/16 for 7 days, which I am also part of on this ISP. Similar situation happened before and admins don’t want to give me IP block exemption, they think I am the one doing this being logged out. Please note that my IP is dynamic and it changes every now and then. This checkUser report would help me get back to bs.wikipedia. I still can edit bs.wiki from my mobile, different ISP, but I don’t want to go out of my way to connect to hotspot, cause I don’t have to. Njamu (talk) 07:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. This request cannot be processed for several reasons. First, due to privacy policy, I cannot publicly declare whether your IP and you are the same user. Second, the range you mentioned has already had its block setting changed to anon-only, so you can edit it when you log in. Third, the issue of IPBE granting is a local issue, so it is not an issue in which we can intervene unless it is a special case. --Sotiale (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks. They updated it to only anon users. Will continue with contribs. Njamu (talk) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Pgamithyt@ta.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Pgamithyt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

தமிழ் வீரன் ஜைத் (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Pagers (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: ta.wiki policy is same as en.wiki

Reason(s): Already a group of socks were identified as socks and same pattern of edits continue from new IDs. Most of the edits are reverted and it is better to find whether they are socks. Please check each of this ID's connections/links with other IDs. Thanks. AntanO 08:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed
  • தமிழ் வீரன் ஜைத் (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • ஸ்டீவன் ஸ்கால் (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • TamilProphet (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • 知恵のラヴァナン (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
  • Zuko Iniesta (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)
• Unrelated Pgamithyt and Pagers

From a technical point of view. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 10:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Peter-bomb king@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Peter-bomb king (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mikedogge (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CHENjiajia2002 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

诗琳童 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Peter-bomb_king

Reason(s): After a lengthy discussion, the petitioner has pointed out the first three accounts engage in similar editing behavior (e.g. forgot to sign) and interest in articles related to criminals receiving capital punishment in China. The forth account is added with endorsement from a local admin, observing that the language used in comments are extremely similar compared to the first three. Thanks in advance. $\int$（☎） 20:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

• Likely Mikedogge and CHENjiajia2002
• Unrelated Peter-bomb king and 诗琳童

---

• They are using proxies or VPNs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Andreiceljmechersibotos@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

Andreiceljmechersibotos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

RomanianHistorian79 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Coiosu123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Imi plac micii (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rares370 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Basestiecasuntsmecher (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Selly Dictatoru (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Dimitrie Simion (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Mario gratar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: Local policy

Reason(s): Massive vandalism campaign. A lot of IPs/users vandalized at ro:w:Tratatul de pace de la Budeasa, ro:w:Tratatul de la Budeasa et. al. Every account blocked today (29 April 2024) and listed here has been involved (as of now). I suspect sleeper accounts (I do not believe that I have blocked all accounts, and I believed that some accounts have not been used yet). --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 19:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

• Unrelated all.

They're not technically relevant, but they're probably MEAT. --Sotiale (talk) 06:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Vitsuha@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

List of users

卡爾斯巴德 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

成延鎮 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Vitsuha

Reason(s): Another potential sock of local LTA Vitsuha. Second account listed is from last check as usual. Please check for sleepers as well. Thanks in advance. $\int$（☎） 06:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Confirmed 卡爾斯巴德, Vitsuha, 宾夕法尼亚州费城, 成延鎮

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)