Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-10

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in October 2018, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

WhenDatHotlineBling

Status: Not done

Guess who's back on my talk page on Meta (really, someone needs to semi-protect that indefinitely). Please run CU, block across all wikis. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Already blocked by Xaosflux and globally locked/talk page protected by RadiX; Anyway, this is in the wrong place; I am assuming it should be formatted and moved to Meta:Requests for CheckUser information probably. Alex Shih (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Tagging as not done since it's dealt with. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Singer neel naik@mr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Bhavesh Patil (Prem) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vaibhav Santosh Naik (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Vandalising marathi wikipedia by creating promotional/spam articles about self. Articles are deleted and protected as they are repeatedly created. --Tiven2240 (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Seems created another account. --Tiven2240 (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Vaibhav Santosh Naik and Singer neel naik are

Confirmed to Vicky s. Naik, Star King's Music Band is

Likely. Bhavesh Patil (Prem) is

Unrelated. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

BESTGNCD170828@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: BESTGNCD170828 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Eric0930 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jxxolh7 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#BESTGNCD170828

Reason(s): These three accounts seems to have similar edit patterns, so I transfer the request to it. --Mend My Way 10:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Done: All three are

Unrelated. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

hewikivoyage

Status: Not done

List of users: 185.27.105.171 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 185.27.105.142 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 141.226.89.129 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 185.46.78.129 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 46.19.86.188 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 46.19.86.127 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 192.114.7.2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): An anonymous troll who came to us recently and vandalizes user's talk pages for about a week. DL3222 (talk) 15:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Not done - CheckUser can only connect accounts with IPs and each-other. Rangeblocks wouldn't help in this case either, since there would be a lot of collateral damage (other accounts that use those IP ranges). Your best option here is just to block the IPs as you see them, or set up abusefilters for the text/links they are adding. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

जाट@hi.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: जाट (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); मनुष्य (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); अः (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); अ आ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Wikram bhai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: local policy link

Reason(s): All appear to edit the same controversial pages i.e. hi:ब्रजभाषा चलचित्रपट, hi:झॉलीवुड, hi:मनोज कुमार (Manoj kumar) and contribute in some other articles. Intentions are same, i.e. to promote some Manoj (Actor), Brajbhasha Cinema etc.

These all users appear to be related to en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MANOZ GYAASI/Archive per above mentioned interests. --SM7^--talk-- 16:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

अः and अ आ are

Stale. All other three accounts are

Likely. Ruslik (talk) 11:50, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Sureshkhole@mr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: नविनघाणेकर (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ElDiablo9412 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 49.15.52.60 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 59.95.136.247 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Same disruptive editing patterns. Flooding with unnecessary deletion tags to disrupt administrative maintainance [1]. Disturbing vote process [2] user was even blocked for vandalism in past Tiven2240 (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Done: All given users are

Unrelated. Linedwell ^[talk] 09:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Haoloaholoa@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Haoloaholoa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 母豬蔡 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 拉丁大師 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Wszgr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Andyonce (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Zhong-Gneoz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Haoloaholoa

Reason(s): It seems to be zh:WP:C7, Copyangry7fcvc, a LTA. It is said that there are similar editing patterns. Some other users suspect it, so this was being put into zh:HAM. Request for checking with confirmed sockpuppets of Copyangry7fcvc (and sleepers).[3] 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 09:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Sidenote by 1233: This was endorsed by other users but I am the one who translate it.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 09:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

thanks for translation 1233--Cohaf (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I am now endorsing this as there are more signs showing it utilizing sockpuppets.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 15:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Have any steward in here?--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 09:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Doing... — regards, Revi 13:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Completed.
Confirmed: Haoloaholoa, 母豬蔡, 拉丁大師, Zhong-Gneoz, 前進奮鬥

Likely to ^: Zt2fdfsv^[1]

Wszgr exclusively used open proxy.

Andyonce is technically Unrelated with this check groups. Unlikely - Possible borderline with Tsiusing106 socks.

— regards, Revi 14:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

References

↑ This one has no contribs, but technical details and timing is suspicious.

Renew2018 (Jessechi) @zh.wikipedia 2

Status: Done

List of users: Renew2018 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Headtaillamp (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Endtoedit (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Shin2019 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 無意筆戰 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 維基什麼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 這你也知道 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 創建創建 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Supportforunity

Reason(s): 1 and 3 are

Confirmed at Steward_requests/Checkuser/2018-07#Renew2018@zh.wikipedia, others are duck-blocked by local sysop, please kindly check if sleepers alive. CreampieGolden State Finals Champion 09:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Renew2018,Headtaillamp,Endtoedit would stale at a few days,I hope any stewards check it quickly.--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 06:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
-revi,can you do this check now?Renew2018 would stale at 6 October(last edit at 6 July[4]),Headtaillamp would stale at 11 October(last edit at 11 July[5]),Endtoedit would stale at 9 October(last edit at 9 July[6]).--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 07:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Renew2018 have been staled at 6 October(last edit at 6 July[7]),Headtaillamp have been staled at 11 October(last edit at 11 July[8]),Endtoedit have been staled at 9 October(last edit at 9 July[9]),so now steward only other five users can check it.--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 09:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Also,Shin2019 would stale at 17 October(last edit at 17 July[10]).--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 09:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

completed.
Confirmed: Shin2019, 無意筆戰, 維基什麼, 這你也知道, 創建創建

No immediately visible sleepers.

— regards, Revi 14:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

תומר אדולף כהן@he.wikisource

Status: Not done

List of users: תומר אדולף כהן (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): The user posted violent graphic threats against the life of someone. This is a matter for the Israeli police. We need the IP address of the user in order to file a compalint.Nahum (talk) 22:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

If there's "threats", then send to Trust and Safety. Please read CheckUser policy. Also, ping to @JSutherland (WMF) and Jalexander-WMF: --Alaa :)..! 05:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Take a look at Threats of harm. Also note that we do not check single account. — regards, Revi 07:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, kind sir. I mailed the emergency mail. you may close this request.--Nahum (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Simon 1996@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Simon 1996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jerry_Bill_Wu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Allthingsgo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Simon 1996

Reason(s): Like to add content with rough translation, both have joined the zh-wiki contests[11], and delete the comments from others, although Behavioural evidence are not similar. In my opinion a CU checking is needed. B dash (talk) 06:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

comment:behaviour not that similar should be the correct translation.--Cohaf (talk) 07:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Well like I said on the local discussion page, there is probably no merit to check. Both using machine translations and having the habit of removing other editor's comments on their talk page are not legitimate reasons when literally everything else is different. Alex Shih (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Alex ShihThis check is well discussed and many users had the same opinion that is to check, I guess it will be best to go by consensus. Just to add, it is not removing comments but alteration of comments in a certain way that connects both. The translation above is not that accurate per say. I am sorry I didn't knew this was submitted that I would had presented the case better, but anyways the key locus of behavioural similarities are as follows: threats after being banned over email, poor machine translations, alteration of talk page messages, participation in contests in Chinese Wikipedia. I am sorry I can't type a better statement as I am currently on mobile for this entire month. --Cohaf (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
I didn't check the accounts, but all except the first are locked for cross-wiki abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Ajraddatz，reported back --Cohaf (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

又众@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 又众 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 琪琪與拉拉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 神川秀康 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 饒舌天王之怒 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 零仙醉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 达丹丹之火 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 重阳糕 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 富察瑯嬅 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#又众

Reason(s): Socket puppets of zh:WP:冏. Due to continuous personal attack towards No1lovesu, MCC214 requests find possible sleepers in case of continuous disruption. Mend My Way 11:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I would like to endorse this request. This has been a persistent zhwiki LTA doing cross wiki abuse (enwp, zhwp and jawp) with very clear behavioral patterns (egregious attacks/death threats etc). I think only the new account (富察瑯嬅) needs to be checked. Alex Shih (talk) 11:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Endorse per WQL and Alex Shih. I seen and rollbacked some of the threats. They seems to be using IP also. If the collateral is not too big, a checkuser block on IP will be helpful also. @Antigng:can you help to coordinate this with stewards. Thanks much. --Cohaf (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Result:
- Non blocked accounts:
  - Confirmed: 空灵的悲哀 as 又众
  - Confirmed: 緘默致函 as 重阳糕
- Already blocked accounts:
  - Confirmed: 又众, 神川秀康 are 琪琪與拉拉
  - Confirmed: 达丹丹之火 as 零仙醉
  - Likely: 小朋友好,饒舌天王之怒 are 零仙醉
Done --rxy (talk) 23:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you rxy. Results forwarded to zhwiki. Alex Shih (talk) 00:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Rxy,富察瑯嬅?Also,重阳糕 relationship to socket puppets of 冏?--MCC214Talk with me#Contributions with me 05:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @MCC214: Possible 富察瑯嬅 is 冏. The user's connection environment is similar with "冏" . but I can't say that is surely so.--rxy (talk) 06:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
  - Let's not ask anymore questions. The remaining work should be done locally to compare behavioral evidence again with this CU result. Alex Shih (talk) 06:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Slayder11930@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Slayder11930 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Alexandra Dragos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:ro:Wikipedia:Checkuser

Reason(s): Slayder11930 continues the disruptive behavior pattern that Alexandra Dragos started to display: mass uploading of files copied from the internet. Gikü (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 14:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 14:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Anne Lis@fr.wiktionary

Status: Done

List of users: Anne Lis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Iparchi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Namnète (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Penelope08 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Champaniarden (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Peyreorade (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: wikt:fr:Wiktionnaire:Bulletin des administrateurs/2018#Anne Lis

Reason(s): French Wiktionary has been disrupted, for months, by a user that has been banned in August, namely Delarouvraie (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). This user, whose disruption actually lasted for years and years especially on French Wikimedia projects (w:fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/Deuxtroy), did not stop contributing after their ban. Indeed, they have been using even more accounts—some are listed above—to spread their disruption across the dictionary project. It could be useful to look for any other sockpuppet related to any of the aforementioned accounts. Automatik (talk) 18:30, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Anne Lis, Iparchi, Namnète and Champaniarden are

Confirmed. Penelope08 is

Likely. In addition, there is Meltini, which is also

Confirmed. Ruslik (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Jun1024@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Jun1024 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); A48498039 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); H125536198 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sonylovef44 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); A0953258578a (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ajack881215 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Jun1024

Reason(s): User MCC214 requested CU for the following reasons: Please have a look at zh:WP:AIV. Someone mentioned that the first 3 accounts are the sockpuppets of zh:WP:小昌.(Note by まっすろな未来: zh:WP:小昌 writes fake Taiwan TV drama articles.)[12][13][14]The 4th account wrote the article zh:等待有情天 [15] which search engine returns no result. For the last 2 accounts, please refer to zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求/2018/8#Ajack881215.(Note by まっすろな未来: contributions/edits by A48498039, A0953258578a, Ajack881215 are related to TV programmes or artists, and these 3 accounts created user pages which describe non-existent/fake TV dramas)User MCC214 finds that a long time has passed but no (local) sysop is following up the matter, and he would like CU to help find out other unknown sockpuppets. --まっすろな未来 (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

no proper local discussion was done for this case yet, request to be placed on hold. --Cohaf (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Meta CU is used to only confirm a connection once behavioral evidence has been established, not to be used to see if there is technical evidence that connects these accounts, which is often not so reliable on its own. If there aren't any zh.wiki administrators taking action, perhaps behavioral wise it's not that similar in the first place. Alex Shih (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- exactly my point conveyed at zhwiki, I temporarily placed this on hold pending further discussion--Cohaf (talk) 11:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

For the references, I expect at least more than two or three days of discussion on non-urgent case, and (usually) do check if the discussion is mature enough. — regards, Revi 14:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

@-revi and Alex Shih:update: accounts duck blocked, but local sysop request a sleeper check. I don't have the rationale for the check yet.--Cohaf (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

If you are clear with what I'm talking about, local discussion hasn't ever been stopped for nearly half a month; in conclusion the discussion is not only "mature enough" but on the edge of turning stale. Moreover, different people and communities have different points of view of what is "Urgent" and what is not. I didn't mean to urge anyone, but please avoid turning CheckUser process into a marathon. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 09:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@-revi:as of now the master had made an unblock request for the local sysop duck block to be overturned, so now the CU results are crucial. please expedite based on this and I am now endorsing this request formally for the record.--Cohaf (talk) 16:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Hey, (as an excuse) these days I have more work in real life, but this should've got done by few weeks ago, and I will do it tomorrow night (KST), unless someone beats me. — regards, Revi 16:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks -revi，--Cohaf (talk) 02:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. We are waiting for your reply. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 08:11, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Actually

Doing... — regards, Revi 08:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Completed, sorry for the delay:
Confirmed: A48498039, Ajack881215

Likely to A48498039 group: 李如芯

Possible to A48498039 group: A0123456a6695^[1], Leo19991101^[1], Jun1024, Sonylovef44, H125536198

A0953258578a was Stale at the time of submission to SRCU. (Stale as of September 8, 2018)

Bolded usernames are not in the original request.

References

↑ ^a ^b No contributions, but timing and technical details are suspicious

— regards, Revi 08:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks -revi, will report back .--Cohaf (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Libertarianmoderate@en.wikivoyage

Status: Done

List of users: Libertarianmoderate (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vulcandor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: en:voy:Wikivoyage:Vandalism in progress

Reason(s): Similar editing style. Traveler100 (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed as well as American Ride, LibMods Revenge, J.B. O'Connor, BlackFathersMatter23, EditReverter0223, TelstraFiredaiLibMod, Nomorebanning0223, Mwahhahhahahah0223, ThunderinTyphoons! and SeIfieCity. Ruslik (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Tugrad@sq.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Tugrad (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Diradul (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Goelia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Albanian wiki WP:SOCK policy

Reason(s): Similar editing style noticed in Tugrad and Diradul: many article name moves in their very first edits (most of them controversial of religious expressions, especially Muslim). Both follow the pattern of globally blocked Goelia, who made hundreds of such moves until globally blocked. Tugrad was confronted in the talk page by me and another user, and as soon as he saw that, he started another account (Diradul). This was typical of Goelia who would never engage in a conversation, but would continuously evade scrutiny.--1l2l3k (talk) 14:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The results are

Inconclusive. I would recommend taking action based on behavioural evidence. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Beatrizzhou0906@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Beatrizzhou0906 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 劉恩均 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Charlottelinai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Evanytkism126824 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Bananapicture (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 郁郁郁南瓜 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Imco2hehe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 一根香蕉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); I'm Wannable I like jihoon (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 岭南人嘉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Beatrizzhou0906

Reason(s): All creating related entertainment-topic articles, which looks like commercial advertisement of 香蕉影业 (Banana Film Company). It seems that there is an ongoing abuse about it, so I request find possible sleepers. --Mend My Way 03:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Doing... — regards, Revi 07:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Completed:
Technically indistinguishable: Bananapicture, 一根香蕉

Possible: Beatrizzhou0906, I'm Wannable I like jihoon

Possible: 郁郁郁南瓜, Wanglitan^[1]

岭南人嘉 is Inconclusive: They exclusively used extremely busy mobile range, there was no meaningful data that can be obtained.

劉恩均

Imco2hehe

Charlottelinai

Evanytkism126824

Each group is Unrelated to other groups unless otherwise stated. Bold usernames are not in request group. You need to evaluate any Possible-marked account's contributions.

References

↑ No contribution, but technical details are suspicious.

— regards, Revi 07:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Dyar kurdi@ckb wiki

Status: Done

List of users: Dyar kurdi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kurdish developer (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: local policy same as English wiki states socks should be blocked, especially if they’re made to evade blocks.

Reason(s): I believe Dyar kurdi could be a puppet of Kurdish developer who was blocked for continuous vandalism, now back under the new username to evade the block. user created a page titled his former user name.

--▸ épine _talk♬ 17:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 19:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 19:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

[1] This one has no contribs, but technical details and timing is suspicious.

[nocontribs-2] No contributions, but timing and technical details are suspicious

[3] No contribution, but technical details are suspicious.

[1]

[1]

[1]