Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-06

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Requests

Krapoihcgniy@zh.wikipedia

  • Update: Krapoihcgniy has just made the same edit a moment ago. Please note that this account had been inactive since May 26th until Esorkap was locally banned today. Kou Dou (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Local discussion first, please. (PS: MediaWiki automatically capitalize the first character of Latin alphabet.) — regards, Revi 14:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. I'll do that. Kou Dou (talk) 14:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Actually, I noticed that Esorkap has been banned, possibly through a DUCK test. Please allow me to withdraw this request. Kou Dou (talk) 04:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
I request this request be checked per zhwp CUP Local Policy #1, which can be executed without local concencus. --云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 10:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
(snip) we have a consensus that local discussion is needed pre-CU. Lnnocentius and you should have a discussion elsewhere to clear something up (and solve discrepancy)? — regards, Revi 13:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm definitely not the only person for discussion and submitting requests, but please first submit your request to zh:WP:RFCUHAM for a local discussion. We do also have a policy of three kinds of cases that does not require a RFCU process, but these policies could only be executed when there exist local CUers, and only by local CUers. --Innocentius Aiolos 13:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) zhwiki RFCUHAM has "致申请人:如果有緊急需求,請直接到元維基的請求頁面。" which translates to "You may (byhass HAM and) report to Meta if there is urgent need" (feat. Google Translate and my re-wording). I don't see an emergency case here. — regards, Revi 13:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done Don't see any new section on zh:WP:RFCUHAM. I don't believe there's an emergency in this case, thus declined. (Relevant local discussion) It can go through RFCUHAM and re-requested here if sufficient discussion has happened. — regards, Revi 06:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Zaganjori @sq.wikipedia

 Confirmed Ruslik (talk) 17:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Xfg45ty@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  •  Confirmed 1: 6gbhsdf, Thyt35465, Xfg45ty, Dgfghh354h
  •  Confirmed 2: Cbv324f, Dfgd4gbd2, 王明洪2, C4tbg3r, 6gbhsdf, ThankTiger
  •  Confirmed 3: Aq3151[1], Dff2e, Gfbh3rvcv, Zxfg24, R2543402, Fgfg234fgt4, 6gbhsdf
  • Likely Likely to Aq3151 above: Anti228, Iloveroc, Wuzhizhang, 反濫權者[2]
  • Confirmed 1, 2, 3 is all Likely Likely to each other.

bold usernames are usernames not in check target. italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 11:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC).

References

  1. Locally blocked as Jessechi sock, technically indistinguishable, but I make no statement on the relationship with Jessechi and this group.
  2. Basically same as Special:Diff/18079431.

— regards, Revi 11:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Link You@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 17:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
They are technically Unrelated Unrelated. — regards, Revi 17:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


Deleter@az.wikipedia

Please read "Before making a request" section at the top of this page, and provide a more detailed reason why the check must run. — regards, Revi 09:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 Declined - no valid rationale for request. I've also checked their behaviour, and there doesn't seem to be much overlap there. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Leilayawlsger@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  • Likely Likely: Robbypays, Steepcower, Leilayawlsger, Mustspermsbefdbd
  • Steepcower and Leilayawlsger share a softblocked IP.

bold usernames are usernames not in check target. italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 10:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC).

— regards, Revi 10:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Mlacer8589@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 11:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: Mlacer8589, Ms2018591, A0341654
  2. Wuxian0928
  • Group 1 and 2 are Unrelated Unrelated.

bold usernames are usernames not in check target. italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 11:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC).

— regards, Revi 11:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Oppabb@zh.wikipedia

My first response to #Krapoihcgniy@zh.wikipedia applies here too. zh:WP:RFCUHAM first, please. — regards, Revi 04:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Declined. You are free to visit zh:WP:RFCUHAM and if request is good enough, community will bring it to here again. — regards, Revi 05:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Jessechi@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 11:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1. Possible Possible: Ewasszx, Iuhjjnm, Nwytbwwq
  2. Nookmook
  3. Likely Likely: 面頁, 存在感低, 沒有登入

  • each group is Unrelated Unrelated with other groups unless otherwise noted below.
  • 2 is Unlikely Unlikely with Iuhjjnm.
  • 1 and 3 are Possible Possible.

bold usernames are usernames not in check target. italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 12:43, 7 June 2018 (UTC).

— regards, Revi 12:43, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia

Who is "we" and why are your IP-address blocked locally? -- Tegel (Talk) 11:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1l2l3k is one of the greatest Master of Puppets in Wikipedia history. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.171.53.92 (talk)
That didn't answer any of my questions. Two of the accounts is checkuser-blocked. If 1l2l3k would be the puppet master that would have shown in these checks.-- Tegel (Talk) 06:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Not done No valid rationale. — regards, Revi 10:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

张家二爷@zh-classical.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Have real life stuff. Will do when I'm back. — regards, Revi 09:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  • Possible Possible: 张家二爷, چوک خَبَر
  • Stale: 张云飞, 簿名簿名簿名, 1tsmlne

— regards, Revi 09:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

莊國微@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  •  Confirmed: 莊國微, 莊冠雄, 李美華朴
  • If zhwiki need checkuserblock on IP, I'd prefer a sysop request it.

— regards, Revi 09:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Warrence66555@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1. Warrence66555
  2.  Confirmed: Tip7804121, Joey1149, Girl10319111, Aisin11Gioro

  • 1 and 2 are Possible Possible.
  • Bold usernames are usernames not in check target. Italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 09:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

— regards, Revi 09:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

123Aristotle@zh.wikipedia

They got similar expressions when they are creating articles that violate COI and violate Terms of Service (undisclosed paid editing). Please check if there are any other sockpuppets of Assezde.Paroles and Blissmediaus as other accounts are Stale. Other accounts are only treated as indicators. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 11:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Chaopi's writing style is very similar to that of 123Aristotle. Pleaser consult en.wp checkusers for more technical data. -Mys_721tx (talk) 03:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Doing... Let me declare obvious things first: Stale for 123Aristotle, 07989Didyoueatanything and Hola.Spada.Verso.il.Sorriso. They're too outdated and no data is preserved as of now. — regards, Revi 11:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1. Chaopi
  2. Assezde.Paroles
  3. Blissmediaus
  4. Rhainliu
    1. Possible Possible to 4, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4[1]: Kangtsunngi, Xanderdong, Tabris dq, Adadai1118, Yueyiren, Smiling Bao
    2. Possible Possible to 4, 4.1, 4.3, and 4.4[1]: Kangtsunngi, MissXPP, Mrqingchun, Bjm Wang, Ystyleb, Mybays, Smiling Bao
    3. Possible Possible to 4, 4.1, 4.2, and 4.4[1]: Sandylee0516, 黑眼田鸡, 郭冲201803, Arkphone, 速看小兔, Anitazhu, Smiling Bao
    4. Possible Possible to 4, 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3[1]: Shaying, Techeek, Freeemanyiu, Whirlwindkelp, Yoferzhang, Smiling Bao
  5. PasPenny.S
    1. Possible Possible to 5 and 5.2[2]: 喷泡的蘑菇
    2. Possible Possible to 5 and 5.1[2]: Nbiot
  6. Stale: 123Aristotle, 07989Didyoueatanything and Hola.Spada.Verso.il.Sorriso

  • Each group is Unrelated Unrelated to each other unless otherwise stated.
  • They seem to be using some sort of proxy, so I just included all of them appeared on check as 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4. It's up to zhwiki community to decide whether they are sock or not.
  1. a b c d Unrelated Unrelated to the 1,2,3,5,6
  2. a b Unrelated Unrelated to the 1,2,3,4,6

This is bit complex and other steward may want to examine my determination as well. — regards, Revi 13:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hatake@sq.wikipedia

CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Instead of copying and reposting my archived request, you could've just continued the discussion there. Contrary to what 1l2l3k claims here, he most likely knows Zall-herr is a sock, as he explicitly asked him this on his talk page.1 Why would one ask X out of the blue if he was Y unless he actually suspects him of being Y?--Udha (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
You're right Udha. I don't understand why they don't block Hatake and his sockpuppets forever from Wikipedia (not just for one week or one month). If there is anyone still doubting, just have a look at what's happening at SQwiki in the last days... More than 15 sockpuppets created by Hatake! With all that behavioral evidence as well, I just can't realize how this can be possible.--Cinephile-al (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2018 (CEST)
@Cinephile-al: user:Ruslik0 said it's confirmed if there is behavioral evidence1, and 1l2l3k sees the behavioral evidence too 1 otherwise he wouldn't have asked him if he's Hatake, so if he refuses to admit it and block Zall-Herr then just go to another administrator.--Udha (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
For the record, Zall-herr is currently blocked in sqwiki, and we are awaiting for the conclusions of this report to decide whether to perm block him, or not. --1l2l3k (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
For the record, you didn't block him. Another admin did. You had plenty of time to do so but you refused, as you claimed here that there was no behavioral evidence, but as I showed in my post above you were lying. You did indeed see behavioral evidence but you refused to act. I'm not the only who's surprised by this.--Udha (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

The IP user:1l2l3k added to the checkuser request, started throwing a fit, vandalizing articles related to communism but also artists and historians whom user:Hatake views as being communist. For the record, Hatake is an ardent anti-communist. The IP started throwing insults. Then when he vandalized some of my articles like this one instead of giving a reason he insulted me "pis i paburre" (Hatake often calls me "unmanly"). Then he vandalized another article including words like "unmanly" and "wicked" in the reasoning (In Albanian wicked is "i paUDHË", a word play for my username Udha)2. When an anonymous IP reverted his vandalism, the troll IP reverted all the edits back giving something like "I reverted Udha" as a reason and throwing some additional insults at me. He then went on to vandalize my User Page and accuse another user of being my sock. Afterwards he created the account User:Barnabë Trohasi. Besides pretty much openly admitting that he's Hatake in his very first edit, insulting the "communists" on SQwiki, he reverted some of his vandalism back, but continued insulting me with his new account "pis i flliqt"--Udha (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

That’s true. Admin 1|2|3k didn’t block Hatake sock Zall-herr, but admin Liridon did it yesterday and just for one week (waiting for checkuser response here). Instead of reporting other people here with no relevance at all, instead of supporting Zall-herr in every article, instead of blocking one of the best contributors in SQwiki for 3 months (!!! user:Udha); Administrator 1|2|3k should block Hatake, the Master of Puppets in SQwiki, responsible for all the mess. 09:43, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

There is no vandalism by anyone else except Hatake/Zall-herr/Barnabë etc, and except for the dozens of calls directed to admin 1|2|3k to protect the neutral version of "Misto Treska" article from Hatake and his 15 sockpuppets malicious and dirty attacks pushing the same POV. We’re not surprised that admin 1|2|3k and Master Hatake share the same negative POV at this article.[2] You've been backing him up regularly, you granted him the privilege of the controller, and you've always approved vandalism that Hatake did to the referenced materials, leaving malicious variants that stain the figure of a dead person 25 years ago (!!!), despite calls by his family members [3] that made you know that they have denounced this unstable human being to the police [4] . Accept here openly that you are a supporter of this vandal and block me, User Arkivisti, User Udha, X, Y and anyone else who doesn't think alike Hatake. You never blocked him, another administrator did, and just for one week waiting for checkuser result here. Go on and block us all, as your Master Hatake orders you. Have a look at "Misto Treska" revision history [5] , there are plenty of IPs who vandalized the article and are still free to vandalize everywhere else as you didn't block them![6] [7] --SnSlol (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2018 (CEST)

I find it interesting that user:1l2l3k didn't need any checkuser confirmation in order to block user:Cinephile-al on SQwiki for creating socks, yet he refuses to block Hatake's sock Zall-Herr, despite him being confirmed as a sock on Meta. User:1l2l3k also isn't blocking User:Barnabe Trohasi despite the fact that he pretty much admitted he's Hatake.see here User:1l2l3k has no problem with blocking IPs for supposedly being socks of banned users, especially of those users who have accused him of abusing his position as a (temporary) administrator. He blocked user:SnSlol and an IP with 2 edits for supposedly being a sock of user:Cinephile-al (see his accusations against 1l2l3k above)2, and also an IP with 1 edit for supposedly being my sock.[3. On the other hand he didn't block the vandalist IP 185.22.172.17 for being a sock of Hatake despite the behavioral evidence I presented above; on the contrary he added that IP to the checkuser request here. It is evident that user:1l2l3k uses double standards. He supports Hatake and retaliates against those who speak out about his abuses. Talking about double standards and retaliation, he reverted back all the vandalism made by 185.22.172.17 except for the vandalism that IP made on my User Page.--Udha (talk) 07:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Please take local discussions to local. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Confirmed and no comment about the IP --Alaa :)..! 22:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

MidnightSun2400@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  •  Technically indistinguishable: MidnightSun2400, Ach1ys, DivotusMaximus, LumpyPotato, BreweryBrew

— regards, Revi 10:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorscontent1@ro.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Added user Sourscecontent1.Andrei Stroe (talk) 08:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Adding ZzhunterzZ12: unusual interest for the situation coming from a new user. Gikü (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Ŝorcecontent1, Sorccontent1, ZzhunterzZ12 and Surscont are  Confirmed - they are the same user. Jose Toy Zn are Nzeza Pro are also Likely Likely. Sourscecontent1 is Possible Possible as well. Ruslik (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hychiang@zh.wikipedia

Note on that Aris Wu and Alia Ritchie are both CU blocked per en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hychiang. Willyhu was probably not blocked due to the account being stale. Alex Shih (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: ENWIKI's CU result is wrong, so here is a re-request. Sæn 02:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Would you mind to back up your assertion? -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
As above. I do TRUST their checkusers. Also, the DATA SET is different in these two occasions.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 03:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Doing... — regards, Revi 11:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: Hychiang, Aris Wu, Willyhu, Alia Ritchie
  2.  Confirmed: Tornado789, Aristotle Ryo, Domopan, Snowjon888, Meli Ryo, Maxinelau[1]

  • Group 1 and 2 are Likely Likely.
  1. Low confidence, not enough data.

— regards, Revi 11:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

@-revi: Does the low confidence apply to group 2 as a whole or to Maxinelau only? -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Maxinelau only. — regards, Revi 18:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Aris Wu@zh.wikipedia

Declined in favor of earlier request. — regards, Revi 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Babalja @sq.wikipedia

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 21:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

 Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 21:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Ebregtpec@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 09:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: NaIRvigation, Careexdepartm
  2. Ebregtpec
  3.  Confirmed: KNstaff, Mymliou
  • Group 1 and 2 are Likely Likely.
  • Group 3 is Unrelated Unrelated to the 1 and 2.

Bold usernames are usernames not in check target. Italicized usernames are not blocked on local as of 09:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

— regards, Revi 09:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia

Duplicate of declined request Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-06#1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia. — regards, Revi 14:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:


  • Bold: Users not in CU request.
  • Italics: Users not blocked on zhwiki as of 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC).
    • Bold and italics: both bold and italics.

All the checks on meta are primarily based on technical data and  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. — regards, Revi 11:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

SPIRIDON MONICA CRISTINA@ro.wikipedia

 It looks like a duck to me. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedian from Greece@el.wikipedia

  • Comment Comment No reason to run this CU. User "Wikipedian from Greece" has been blocked indefinitely in the Greek-language WP as a sock. ——Chalk19 (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
What is this, Liuxinyu970226? A joke? ——Chalk19 (talk) 06:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Psst, closed by Ruslik, Idk why he ignored comment here. Sorry for my misjudgement. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ebregtpec@zh.wikipedia

--云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 09:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I'd say Inconclusive Inconclusive for (mostly) insufficient data. See also Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-04#Copyangry7fcvc@zh.wikipedia and Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-06#Ebregtpec@zh.wikipedia. Those stated as confirmed on the archive is valid. — regards, Revi 11:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ewasszx@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 11:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

All listed + 省略可能 is Likely Likely. — regards, Revi 11:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

TP-Linkben@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 08:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

All technically Unrelated Unrelated. — regards, Revi 08:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

风华雪月@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 08:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Inconclusive Inconclusive. Insufficient data with other (nonpublic) factors. — regards, Revi 08:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Wangyewangke@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

 Confirmed. — regards, Revi 10:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

华南莊@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Two additional socks: Chong wa nam and 旪家希. CUblocking it will involve blocking /18 with lots of collateral damage. Do you really wish to proceed? — regards, Revi 10:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Okay. Do not apply the blocks.--Xiplus (talk) 14:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Got it. For the record, all accounts + the accounts I mentioned are all  Confirmed. — regards, Revi 15:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

MidnightSun2400@zh.wikipedia(SiuMai)

Doing... — regards, Revi 15:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 Confirmed to the previous socks, and used bunch of OP. No sleeper immediately visible. — regards, Revi 15:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MidnightSun2400
thanks-revi,translated back already, waiting administration--Cohaf (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Pmsuccess@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  1.  Confirmed: Pmsuccess, Imingwu
  2. Likely Likely to 1: Venice5110
  3. The rest are Possible Possible to 1 and 2.

  • As always, this is purely technical data and does not involve any editorial behaviors. It's up to zhwiki community to evaluate it.

— regards, Revi 12:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Michael Chabot@wikidata

 Confirmed as well as Alfred.Delmore - Lauwiner Empire and Steve.Hudgens. Ruslik (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyage

What abuse are they conducting? (From the page top description: "It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.") — regards, Revi 12:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
OK, seems there's some abuse ongoing. Doing... - but please make sure to give us what they are doing otherwise we can't know about them. — regards, Revi 12:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
User creates new accounts, 3 or 4 a day on and off for a few years now. For some of these new account nothing happens. Good number of them makes one sometimes two edits, occasionally useful but usually pointless or minor. Sometimes creates page just to create work for other contributors to clean up. Will then follow edit from one user account name with single edits from other user account names. --Traveler100 (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed with following groups:

  1.  Technically indistinguishable: Darco439, Petticote890, TheSeriousTourist83, Perrick3283, ElectricGuy002, Anteron371, Pariscope424, Greenslopes2018, CattleGamer453, ForTheWay572, Liberator1983, Edenman420, Roadmaker463, OfCourse23, Herzag3, Penthold41
  2.  Confirmed: AltoCorealis, Tallyore, PizzaDude43
  3. Magellino

Group 1 and Group 2 are Possible Possible. Group 1 and 3 are Likely Likely. (Some of the accounts in group 1 are not blocked, check them.)

— regards, Revi 12:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyag 2

Doing... — regards, Revi 07:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  •  Confirmed: MarvelousTraveller473, SittingDuck1993, SpringSurprise313, Denarone32, Penthold67, TheWizard565, Yennor464, Priscott223
  • Those are  Confirmed with check group 1 and 3 yesterday.

— regards, Revi 08:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

典松園@zh.wikipedia

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

No immediately visible sleepers. — regards, Revi 10:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyage 3

Doing... — regards, Revi 14:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Completed:

  •  Confirmed to the result 1 group 1: Ottley483, Ascott6
  • Likely Likely to the result 1 group 2: Tanscote320
  • Unrelated Unrelated to the Telstra sockfarm: Sahandmz1989, ZoliaDowie6670

This is a purely technical data, and I didn't check edit for their behavior. Standard conduct for CU is that behavioral evidence overrides technical data. — regards, Revi 14:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyage 4

Doing... — regards, Revi 10:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

User 3 (arrock8) does not exist. Momu197 and Huyenpham505 are Unrelated Unrelated. Westell4738 and Aeroplatter353 are  Confirmed to be that Telstra sockfarm, along with Pilitt32, Jittelt22, Yenil45, TomWayne2. — regards, Revi 10:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyage 5

Doing... — regards, Revi 04:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Everything except LarueCarter536 (this one is Unrelated Unrelated spambot)  Confirmed. Also confirmed:

  • MarketShopper017
  • Cappel40
  • BlueSurfer340
  • Milker43
  • TravelOfCourse
  • Yahman32
  • Civilizer023
  • Bannollt313
  • Attlee319
  • Parru234
  • Nentome
  • Pallow293
  • Zindoll20
  • Pallette302
  • Pantock33
  • Tiller30
  • PillowMan408
  • Pilton34
  • TheAlpineClimber300
  • Bentolle32
  • AeroPlane18
  • CafeSinger232
  • Parnator400
  • Penthouse480
  • Thalton43
  • EyeFeast21
  • Pelline321
  • Ennis342
  • SunDriver08
  • OfCourse7
  • GoyPullett
  • BeeMan9
  • Skittler484
  • Pottelt343
  • Sigmal8
  • Coltron3220
  • JohnFruitgrove
  • Tennyson440

— regards, Revi 05:04, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Darco439@en.wikivoyage 6

  • Neno13453 is Unrelated Unrelated.
  • Following accounts are  Confirmed:
    • Martin3848
    • Omeletta23
    • Maurot382
    • Porter210
    • Scarlett382
    • Annetta43
    • Tommi483
    • Erit423
    • request 5 socks.

— regards, Revi 05:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

FreshCorp619@en.wikipedia

Not done. Wikipedia in English have local Checkusers that can handle the request. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)