I think I can help with the second question.
Let us look at what the last sentence says:
Quote:
If individuals are normally motivated to at least strive for a moral self-image in this way, we should not be too hasty to discount the common-sense assumption that moral motivation is typically behind moral action.
It essentially means:
Based on what we have discussed so far, Moral Motivation ==> Moral ActionsAny option that breaks this logic will be our answer.
Quote:
I. Subjects who, on a scale of generous to selfish, rated themselves as more generous were no more or less likely to act generously than subjects who rated themselves as more selfish.
This option tells us that regardless of what subjects think of themselves regarding their generosity, their moral actions are same. In other words, motivations do not affect the moral actions of the subjects. This option would weaken the conclusion.
Quote:
II. Subjects who acted the most generously in a spontaneous situation were largely unable to identify clear reasons for their actions.
This option again says that the subjects are not able to identify the reason(s) for their moral actions. This means motivation is not present. Otherwise they would have been able to identify Motivation as one of the reasons. Hence, we see moral actions without moral motivation. This option, again, would weaken the conclusion.
Quote:
III. Subjects who acted generously in the first phase of an experiment were less likely to act generously in the next phase of the experiment.
We cannot draw any conclusion based on this statement regarding moral actions or motivations of the subjects. It is simply possible that some of the subjects were Morally motivated in the first phase of the experiments but lost the motivation in the next phase. We cannot conclude anything with this option.
Therefore, I and II it is.
Option
C should be correct.