(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Sreejithk2000

Joined 23 June 2006

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FairuseBot (talk | contribs) at 11:31, 15 February 2011 (Image File:Duke Nukem Screenshot2.jpg is not compliant with the non-free content rules). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Graphic Lab/Photography workshop

Thank you for helping out in the Graphic Lab/Photography workshop, good job keep it up. cheers Gryffindor (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your bot

Hi! Please, be more careful when you're solving interwiki conflicts with your bot. You made a complete mess with Aymara people and Aymara language interwikis. Hugo.arg (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I did not understand or investigate all the links properly before making the changes. Rather than reverting back my changes, can you please correct the interwikis if you can? --Sreejith K (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have already done that =) Hugo.arg (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sree, please do not run the bot during or before approval (even trials have to be approved at the English Wikipedia). If the bot runs again it will be blocked until after approval. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free reduce

I was wondering why you reduced the file File:Saw 3D Final.jpg. I added Non-free reduce instead of Non-free reduced. I was using the tagging feature (FurMe) and didn't initially catch what it said. That being said, thanks for adding the non free reduced tag on there. :P Mike Allen 23:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Don't Change my creation

Good Afternoon, Mister
Previously I apologize to you, but this is very important for you. I warn you not to change the license and the copyright on the image I uploaded to wikipedia, the use has been in the Arrange Copyright by Wikimedia Commons, ok. | LFi (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I believe you are talking about File:MNC TV MNC-Group.png. The size of this file has to be reduced to meet WP:NFCC. Please revert back the changes you have done to the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please respect my upload

I know that the logo of DWDB-TV File:Citynet27.jpg is not mine but it took me time for me to vectorize and add colors for that. Why did you reduced it. You made my vectorized copy looked ugly. I want a reasonable explaination for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinoyprovider (talkcontribs) 06:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you are talking about File:Citynet27.jpg, this file is not vectorized. This is a jpg file and is scalar. If there is a vector version available, please let me know. Non-free JPG images needs to be of a smaller size than the original as per WP:NFCC and that's why I resized it. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Permissions question

As I see you just added the OTRS to File:Mmix.png implying it was accepted perhaps you could explain the message on the uploaders talk page and how appears to indicate be a non-valid OTRS. In case that didn't come out right - On November 30 the image was tagged for no license and the tag removed several times when on December 8 the license was added as PD. A message posted at 4:52 said "I'll email the author to double check this." and than, 8 minutes later, indicated "Email sent and forwarded to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org." That is all fine and well however at 21:38 on December 9 the uploader said "The author replied, but was quite annoyed at being contacted again. I should have gone with my instincts and never listened to you. Sigh." It still doesn't make sense that December 8 the author was contacted and a permissions email sent but it wasn't until the next day the author replied and "was quite annoyed at being contacted again." The final comment and "sigh" gives a strong indication of something than a clear permission to release it into PD. Soundvisions1 (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am an OTRS volunteer and I have seen and verified the email from Don Knuth, the author of the image. I understand that Arial removed the deletion notice multiple times which in fact he should not have done. Whatever Arial said in his talk page is also reflecting in the emails which Arial and Don Knuth has sent to OTRS. If you want to double check the permissions, you can contact someone else with an OTRS account. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I understand your vagueness because it is the "rules". Actually I already asked someone else with an OTRS account before you ever got involved but someone else with an OTRS account got involved and neither one them would say anything about it other than it was "locked" and presumably would be resolved. I contacted *you* because you are the one who placed the final notice on the image. My concern here is copyright and, as it relates to copyright issues, the privacy portion of OTRS makes it extremely hard for someone such as myself to verify copyright - especially in situations such as this when the "public" time line paints a very different picture. (And yes, I have discussed the privacy issue in the past with others that have an OTRS account). Thanks though for looking into it (?) again. Soundvisions1 (talk) 07:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I understand your concerns. But as part of OTRS privacy policy, I cannot reveal the contents of the the email we received at OTRS. I think one of the reasons for concern was that I did not put {{OTRS received}} tag when the first email was received. I will definitely get another OTRS member cross verify the OTRS ticket to make sure that there is nothing dubious about it. Thanks in advance for your patience. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'll confirm that the email provides usable permission and that the author did indeed appear to be "quite annoyed at being contacted again". The timeline is also correct, although I can see how it's confusing when you don't have access to see for yourself; the original communication was forwarded when they said it was and then more was sent later. I don't believe that breaches any of our privacy policy, and I hope it clears things up a bit. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Johanna Long.jpg OTRS

Hi there,

I'll contact the people at her PR agency and see if they can email the OTRS permissions people with a more explict release. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 03:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Photography workshop Top 4

Congratulations! You have now completed more Top 4 requests than any other user on record (99 requests, that is)! Thanks for all of your hard work! Guoguo12--Talk--  14:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Awesome. I wish to make it 999 sooner or later :) --Sreejith K (talk) 14:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

OTRS request

Hi, Sreejith. I see you're an OTRS volunteer. Could you please clarify to me the licensing status of File:68731 FIRE logo.jpg? It's tagged as a non-free image, but it has an OTRS ticket number. From the date it seems that the OTRS ticket applies to the version uploaded 2 December 2008 and not the current version—is that correct? And what exactly was said in that OTRS ticket—has the 2 December image actually been released by the copyright holder under a free license? —Bkell (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are right. The OTRS ticket is applicable for the 2 December 2008 logo. The email had the logo as attachment and a note saying that the logo has been recently updated and this is the new logo. So the image was non-free then and the new image as well. Ideally, the OTRS ticket number should not have been placed on the page since that was not related to license. I have updated the image page accordingly. Thanks for checking. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I see. Thanks for looking into it. —Bkell (talk) 12:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

BAGBot: Your bot request SreeBot

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SreeBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 21:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.Reply

Check OTRS

Can you varify this image File:Santhosh_George_Kulangara.jpg as user User:MichaelMaggs not in this list. I am writing on your talk page because this is the picture of famous keralite + posed shot and assume that personality rights are protected..Kalarickan | My Interactions 08:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

This image came from Santhosh George's personal website http://www.santhoshgeorge.com/. The footer of the website says that the copyright is owned by Labour India Publications. The OTRS email has been sent from Labour India as well. So the permissions on the image are OK. And since its a picture already published on the internet, I am not quite sure whether we should question the personality rights. You may ask some experienced editors from commons about this. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

stop changing my greys anatomy pics!!

stop changing all my greys anatomy cast pictures to pixelated, wrong pictures. go away . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.206.235 (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

SeeBot @ bnwiki

Please put a request on bnwiki BRFA page. Thanks! — Tanvir • 03:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

did u like that movie? how many times did you watch it? don't you think watching that movie is a risky thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.86.74 (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Kawasaki_Ninja_Logo-Square.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kawasaki_Ninja_Logo-Square.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. mattofwashington (talk) 21:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

About your Admin Coaching request

 

Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed.

You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited!

As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all).

If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia!

Regards, elektrikSHOOS 05:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Top 4 requests

Please update data here after giving new tasks. Vearthy (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Vearthy, I have not added any tasks for Top 4 yet. I do not plan to do that either. I just want to work on things that others suggest as Top 4. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image Resize

Hello there. I noticed that you seem to be using a resizing tool to assist at Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction request. Do you know what the underlying software the program is using is? I ask because I have been doing them manually, using the free program Paint.NET, and seem to be getting better results in, to be completely honest, less random sizes. One recent file you reduced came to a final size of 344×351. I redid that file File:Pygmies in Tintin in the Congo.JPG, at the same size to compare the two. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on the comparison. If you believe that the image resize tool is comparative in quality to the original, I would consider switching over, as it would save me plenty of time, however I am not quite sure that is the case. Please leave me a talkback template message if you respond. Thanks, Sven Manguard Wha? 00:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Seven. I am using a custom tool for Wikipedia called RSoC's Image Resize Tool. As you can see, this is not a graphical tool like Paint.NET and so it gives inferior results as compared to tools like Paint.NET, Windows Picture Editor, etc. I using this tool because of the ease of using it. I started using this tool some time back when the backlog in Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction request was above 2000 and this tool was quite helpful at that time. If you are watching this category and clearing the backlog, I would be more than glad to stop using this tool and leave the task for you. Thanks for bringing this to my notice. --Sreejith K (talk) 02:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I will continue to clear that backlog, but it's still nice to know about the tool, in case the backlog get's too big. It's incredibly easy to use Paint.NET, it just takes about a minute to do each one, longer considering that I do several things at once. I happen to love automated tools, but in this case, I think I'll just do it manually. Please feel free to keep using the tool, and cleaning the backlog yourself. I don't want to create the impression that I'm chasing you away, I'm not. Thanks for telling me about the tool, and thanks for helping clear that backlog. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have used several graphic editors and is quite comfortable resizing images, but when coming to resizing a lot of images from Wikipedia, I am quite lazy to download the file, reside it and then re-upload it. :). RSoc's tool makes this task incredibly easy and I have tweaked the tool to run in an almost (90%) automated way. It takes off the clarity a bit, but for non-free images, the clarity does not often matter that much since the expectation from the image is just to get a visual impression on what the article is about. You are not chasing me away, I will continue to do other stuff which I have been doing, but I feel that there isn't enough backlog in the category now which requires two persons working on it simultaneously. Wish you happy resizing :) --Sreejith K (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

HMS Decoy

Don't two identical waves put one just under another look weird to you? To me it does. I don't want to be the one who grumbles all the time but could you please do the work more carefully so the photo doesn't look false? Thanks. Vearthy (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I did not notice that when I did that in a hurry :). Gave it another shot now. You will have to purge the cache to see the latest version. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

TOP 4

I can still see the remains of the watermarks on the photos, especially last 2 ones. Even if the task is easy, and that one was, it should be done PRECISELY. You did all of them in hurry. Don't do that again, it makes my blood boil to tell everybody about that. Thanks, and please redo those. Vearthy (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Woe, Is Me

Hey, bud; give a watch when naming files. The band Woe, Is Me have a comma in their name after all. =) -- GunMetal Angel 17:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you see the file history, you can see that the image was not uploaded by me. I just resized it to meet WP:NFCC. If you believe the filename should have a comma, please use the {{rename}} template to fix it. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Duke Nukem Screenshot2.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply