MicroX
){kind=link}
Welcome
Hello, MicroX, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Carioca 07:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Offer
Do you want any help on creating Uruguayan football seasons (First Division)?? Rakuten06 23:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Helpme
{{helpme}}
- Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.)--Werdan7T @ 21:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- {{helpme}}I would like to know if you have to license and copyright images that you have photographed before uploading.
Thank You,
MicroX 21:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- {{helpme}}I would like to know if you have to license and copyright images that you have photographed before uploading.
- Yes. All uploaded images require licensing information. If you took the pictures yourself, you can choose how you wish to license it. You must choose a free license, which means it can be used for any purpose, even commercial uses. You can see a list of some acceptable licenses here, as well as a brief description of each. For more information about licenses , see here--Werdan7T @ 22:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- {{helpme}}Where do I go to license under GNU Free Documentation License?
Thank You,
MicroX 22:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)- Go to Special:Upload, fill in the fields, and select GFDL (self made) from the Licensing selector box.--Werdan7T @ 22:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- {{helpme}}Where do I go to license under GNU Free Documentation License?
Decorative Fair Use
{{helpme}}
- What do you want help with? Place the {{helpme}} tag back up, with a description of the problem, so we know to check back. --ais523 18:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- What does decorative fair use mean? I have seen it a couple of times.
- It's the practice of using a fair-use image in a situation where it doesn't make the article/page it's on more encyclopedic, just prettier (such as using logos of sports teams in userboxes). It's against fair use criterion 8, and in most cases is probably copyright violation, so it should always be avoided. I hope that helps! --ais523 18:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- What does decorative fair use mean? I have seen it a couple of times.
Strange Symbol
{{helpme}} How do you make this –– symbol? When I try to do that, I get this --.
- Look at the bottom of the page, underneath "Save Page". There is a section called "Insert" and the dash should be there. Real96 23:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Deleted Image
Hi.
I know that you just deleted the image I uploaded of "Estadio Miguel Grau Piura.jpg". I don't know why it was deleted because the owner (of worldstadiums.com) gave me permission to use it.
MicroX 03:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Such licenses are not allowed on wikipedia. You can read more at Wikipedia:Image use policy. In short the image has to be under a free license. Rettetast 07:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, it didn't. You asked if you could use the image on wikipedia and got a yes. Nothing more nothing less. We want wikipedia to be a free encyclopedia where one can use what you find in other places. Such licenses as this image had could not be used elsewhere. You can ask if they want to release the images under a free license, but it is probably easier to take a picture of your own, or find a wikipedian who live nearby to take on. You can also request an image on Commons:Commons:Picture requests. Rettetast 21:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Where do you find that. I only see this. All materials appearing on World Stadiums, unless otherwise noted, including but not limited to stadium information, graphical images, and interactive applications cannot be reused in any way without prior permission from the owner[1]. Rettetast 21:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, you did get permission, but only for wikipedia, and it is policy to not allow such images, because it can't be used by any others. Rettetast 05:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Where do you find that. I only see this. All materials appearing on World Stadiums, unless otherwise noted, including but not limited to stadium information, graphical images, and interactive applications cannot be reused in any way without prior permission from the owner[1]. Rettetast 21:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, it didn't. You asked if you could use the image on wikipedia and got a yes. Nothing more nothing less. We want wikipedia to be a free encyclopedia where one can use what you find in other places. Such licenses as this image had could not be used elsewhere. You can ask if they want to release the images under a free license, but it is probably easier to take a picture of your own, or find a wikipedian who live nearby to take on. You can also request an image on Commons:Commons:Picture requests. Rettetast 21:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Universitario logo
I got this particular logo from www.hqfl.dk, like most of my logos, but quite a few peruvian ones are made specially by a friend who creates them in adobe illustrator. --shanda 20:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:CopaCableMagico.PNG)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:CopaCableMagico.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
GPL
{{helpme}}
Does Wikipedia allow GPL-licensed work?
- Yes. For a list of acceptable licenses, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses. --Sopoforic 18:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note that this applies to images and other uploaded media: the text you contribute you must license under the GFDL. --Sopoforic 18:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Template Help
{{helpme}} I was wondering why the UNI in the first row, last column is positioned like that? Template:Fb r header Template:Fb r team
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r Template:Fb r
- Could you tell me where this table came from originally? It would help in working out the answer. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 20:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- It would appear to be an error in the underlying template - have a look at Template:Fb_r_header and you'll see things go awry on column 12...will continue to have a look. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 20:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- OK, well, it's definitely a problem in that page somewhere (one too many {'s, I suspect. Beyond me, though...at least you know it's not something you're doing wrong! Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 20:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- It would appear to be an error in the underlying template - have a look at Template:Fb_r_header and you'll see things go awry on column 12...will continue to have a look. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 20:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Problems
I have recently seen the edit you have done to the Peru National Football Team article.
I'm sure you meant it as a good edit, but I do not approve of what you have done. The reasons as to why I come to this conclusion are:
1. You should not have taken out the section of recently played matches. 2. What do "Recent Matches" have to do with having the words beginning the article within its section? 3. Why remove the U-17 section of the article?
You might think, "Who is this guy to come and tell me these things?" Well, I've worked very hard in improving the Peru National Football Team article; it was me that took the time to translate nearly all of the Spanish text into English, added that I found the majority of the source-links for the article and basically I've spent a lot of time in seeking its improvement.
I would just like to hear from you and know what exactly were your thoughts when you did your edit.
You should have also posted something in the discussion topic before making such a big edit. There are others, like me, that are also highly active in checking the article is doing alright and I would have for the least wanted to see some words said by you in the discussion part of the article. Yet, it seems to me that you just edited as you wished.MarshalN20 04:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Universitario Peer Review
{{helpme}}
The peer review Universitario de Deportes remains on the main page and does not move to the archived version of October. Does someone know how to do this? --MicroX 19:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Done - I removed it from the main page and moved the PR to the October page. Jonathan (T•C) 21:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
border colors
{{helpme}}
How do I make the all the borders in this table solid red?
| Column heading 1 | Column heading 2 | Column heading 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Row heading 1 | Cell 2 | Cell 3 |
| Row heading A | Cell B | Cell C |
- I am not sure if this is the best way, but it works:
| Column heading 1 | Column heading 2 | Column heading 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Row heading 1 | Cell 2 | Cell 3 |
| Row heading A | Cell B | Cell C |
- I hope this helps!--12 Noon 23:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
wikitable colors
{{helpme}}
| Group Stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagles | Lions | Cobras | Centaurs |
In a wikitable, what is the color code for both the dark grey and the light grey. Thanks, --MicroX 00:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- The wikitable class is governed by some code in Mediawiki:Common.css, which reveals that the light grey is #f2f2f2 and the dark border is #aaa. Algebraist 00:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Redirect page policies
Is there a policy on redirect pages, where it is preferred that the actual article name is used instead of the redirect link. Take this example: São Paulo FC [[São Paulo Futebol Clube|São Paulo FC]] São Paulo FC [[São Paulo FC]]*This is the redirect page. --MicroX 00:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi MicroX. The question is whether article names should be piped to the full name rather than using a shortened version. Redirects aren't involved with the examples you've given because the link pipes the user directly to the article and avoids the redirect, which also happens to exist, entirely. So the question is involved with our policy on piping links and on linking in general, set forth at Wikipedia:Piped link and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links). I don't see much which directly addresses your question. There is some discussion that piping links should be done when the wording of the exact link title does not fit in context and that piped links should be as intuitive as possible. Neither really addresses the issue here. I think that both the shortened and full version would fit in most contexts and both are intuitive. No one seeing the shortended version of the name will think, "what could that be?" that the full link would help clear up. Personally though, in a formal encyclopedia article, I think the better practice when first mentioning a subject (which generally should be wikilinked once), is to provide the full, formal name.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thanks and question about the nulling of my helpme request tag
Thank you for stopping by and checking out my helpme request. As it was my first time using that tag, I was blown away by how much help I received. Just curious as a newer user, what is the threshold of response before the tag is nulled by a helper? Thanks, again. -Gwguffey (talk) 06:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- nope, I don't need to ask again. I was just curious what the community consensus was for how much help is generally considered enough to put in the null (1 really good one? 4 smaller ones? etc.) for when the day comes that I respond to a helpme request. Best wishes. -Gwguffey (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
template coding help
{{helpme}} Template:Fb cl header Template:Fb cl team Template:Fb cl qr |} If you notice on this template, the qualification or relegation stretches because the qualifing tournament is longer. Is there a way to center the qualification or relegation text so it doesn't appear funny? --MicroX 14:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC) (Don't forget to remove template when you've offered help)
- Yes - editing Template:Fb_cl_header so that the line :
!width=180|{{#if:{{{promoted|}}}|Promotion|Qualification}} or relegation<br /><!--
reads
!width=180|<center>{{#if:{{{promoted|}}}|Promotion|Qualification}} or relegation<br /><!--
should fix it, as per User:Gilesbennett/Sandbox - note that I've increased the width of the cell to 300 to show that it centers, as there isn't an extra-long line in the table below. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 15:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Done. I was teaching you to fish, rather than just giving you a fish! ;-) Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 15:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good point - well spotted! Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 16:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Playoff
Hi MicroX i also live on peru, do u know when its going to be played the playoff between sport aguila and atletico minero for defining who is going to be the 14th team, because i want to start an article for the team that will be promoted, thanks and merry xmas :P
Omar otiniano (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thank u very much, maybe u can give me ur prediction for the match xD, i think sport aguila is going to win, well, thanks
Omar otiniano (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Utricampeoncarranza.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Utricampeoncarranza.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
fb r header for 14 teams
- Sorry for the long delay. I was not using Wikipedia for while and I should have posted a sign about that. Anyway, you probably know that User:Darryl.matheson have added 14 clubs. Regards. --ClaudioMB (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Primera División Peruana
My apologies for reverting your change. I saw the edit on RecentChanges, and alarm bells went off in my head: an anonymous editor, removal of what seems like legitimate content, and an edit summary that claims to make minor changes, while in actuality changing the facts. In hindsight, it's a good reminder that I shouldn't be so quick to judge an edit by its cover, so to speak. See you around! Fogster (talk) 00:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Existing pages
{{helpme}} I just created the page Primera División Peruana 1996. However, on the page Primera División Peruana 2003 at the bottom in the seasons template it shows that it doesn't exist. I don't know why it does this. --MicroX 01:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- It comes up for me. Try purging the server or clearing your cache. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
gavg for Fb cl team...
...has just been added. Now tell me: Which league uses this rather ancient form of a tie-breaker? :-D --Soccer-holic (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
RFC on " Astobiological Potential "
Is what is happening here what I think is happening here? 198.163.53.11 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- IP spam from a City of Winnipeg network. Make what you will of that. . dave souza, talk 23:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Utricampeoncarranza.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Utricampeoncarranza.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:New Rosas Pampa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:New Rosas Pampa.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 16:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Moving articles
Next time, open it up a proper discussion in the article's talk page. I'm sure there are more people than you and I who might have an input on how the article is called. Digirami (talk) 18:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Very few people look into the discussion pages regarding South American soccer. The only people that do take the time to read them are you and me. So if we don't agree on something, we'll never reach consensus. --MicroX 01:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- But I opened a proper discussion in the talk pages of the respected pages (see: here and here). It not my fault no one else participated. Digirami (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- "Very few people look into the discussion pages regarding South American soccer". Where do you get that idea from? I reverted your un-discussed move of Arsenal de Sarandí back to the common name. Please discuss proposed moves at the article's Talk page or, in the case of Argentine Football at WP:ArF. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 20:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Colombian league
I don't know to be honest. I've never learned the non-sponsored name of that division of Colombian Professional Football in any season regulations or anything. Seems like something that should be confirmed because I really doubt it is called Colombian Professional Football. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. Digirami (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- The regulation for the second level (found here) seems to concur with what you found, with formal full name being "Categoria Primera A/B" (that would go somewhere in the opening paragraph of the article, of course). If we rename it, lets go about it the right way. I'm sure the editor(s) of Colombian football would like their say in this matter. Digirami (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. Let's do a requested move. It'll open up the move for voting and discussion. Digirami (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- I also think we should move any Copa Mustang I and Copa Mustang II articles into a single season articles, despite two championships. Like want I brought about with the Primera Division Argentina. I had a discussion about this sorta thing in the WikiFootball project, and the general concensus was to have a season article first, and then, if needed, additional articles for each championship. Digirami (talk) 04:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
2010 Copa Sudamericana
I see you have created the article for the 2010 Copa Sudamericana. I'll help you keep an eye on it. But I have one question on the berths. I understand that all countries except Argentina and Brazil will gain a berth. But is it mentioned anywhere that Argentina and Brazil would lose berths? Cause they suddenly lost 1 and 3 berths, respectively. Digirami (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think the source might be wrong. I double-checked Argentina's season regulations, and it says they will have 6 berths for 2010. Brazil's says they still have 8 for 2010. I think we should trust those regulations because it's about as close as an official statement from CONMEBOL we can get at the moment. Digirami (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Primera Division naming
I'm not quite sold on the Colombian example by the simple fact that their current season hasn't been updated in a while. That would indicate little, if any, recent contribution from their normal editors. I once brought this up for discussion in the Wiki:Footy talk page (see: here). I don't think any clear consensus was formed on any one, but I think the format under which Primera División Uruguaya is under was not widely accepted. Either way, I am in no position to just start renaming all pages (especially the Argentine and Mexican leagues) because of the uproar it might raise. Digirami (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- If you can combine them into one article per season, like in Argentina, that'll be great. As for naming, I'm increasing favoring "Primera Division (country) format. It is probably the most accurate per the guidelines when it comes to disambiguating, and is adaptable to the league season ("2009-10 Primera Division season (country)"). But it still be open to discussion. Digirami (talk) 21:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- And in some regulations (especially this season's), its called "Division Profesional". This is where WP:COMMONNAME becomes the deciding factor. That's how I dealt with Ecuador's main page. Digirami (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
After giving it some more thought, maybe we should go with Primera División of [Country] naming, so the cross-language doesn't look so off like in Mexican Primera Division.--MicroX (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Take it to the talk page of the WikiProject. Digirami (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Ligas Superiores del Peru
While checking Category:2009 domestic football (soccer) leagues, I stumbled upon an article named Ligas Superiores del Peru 2009. The corresponding main article revealed that these leagues are located on the fifth step (out of seven) of the Peruvian football league system.
The main article tends towards a "keep" for me as this step might just be notable enough to warrant an article. However, I don't really know what to do about the season article (PROD or not?). Since you seem to be "the" expert on Peruvian football in here (as mentioned by User:Digirami ;-) ), what is your opinion in this case? --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LogoTotalClean.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LogoTotalClean.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 19:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Administrators
Hi. Here is the list of administrators in Wikipedia available in English. International club competition records article has been blocked by user (and wiki-administrator) Toddst1 on November 20, 2009.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Tell Toddst1 to block the the page.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Please, check this page and this edit again. Thank you.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Bracket no-seeds
{{helpme}} I was observing the 3round-byenoseeds and 4round-byenoseeds tournament brackets without seeds yet the seeds boxes still appear. Is there a way to remove those boxes? --MicroX (talk) 00:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Edit: I need these brackets to be displayed without the seeds because I am using them for this domestic season that utilized a 4 round bracket with byes and no seeding system was used. Similarly I will be incorporating the the 3 round bracket-byenoseeds into this season as well and once again no seeds will be needed. --MicroX (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Give me a short time to investigate. I will reply here soon. Chzz ► 06:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies; I've had a look at this, and it is much more complex than I imagined to achieve without breaking things; if we change the code to say 'only display the seed box if a seed is given', then there are further problems with the table if one seend is given but the other isn't, for a given round. I'm sure that it could be done, but it would take more time than I have right now. Once again, sorry - I will reinstate your request to see if others can assist. Chzz ► 07:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- On second thoughts - and upon advice from another user - there are separate templates for tournaments with seeds. So, if nobody has used these with seeds, then those sections could just be removed altogether. Maybe someone could do that; I did try (in a sandbox), but messed it up, so I'm leaving it to people who know what they're doing. Chzz ► 07:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Colors
I don't know either why domestic leagues and international tournaments are treated differently. I don't see much of a problem, though, as this is what has been done before (at least in the 1.75 years of my Wiki participation), seems to be established consensus, and no one has asked that question before. If you like, raise your issue at either the SATF talk page or the WP:FOOTY talk page. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 00:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
CopaLib response
Yes... Only when we replace it in the articles it is used it. Digirami (talk) 23:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Or, better yet, swap out the old code for the updated one. Digirami (talk) 01:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yep. But after examining what articles have that template in place, I guess maybe we should rename it to {{TwoLegStart Points}} and then create another template for the new header with what we are using in the 2010 and call it {{TwoLegStart CONMEBOL}} (since it can be used in Copa Sudamericana articles, too).
- In the meantime, I'm going to jump ahead and modifying the 2008 edition to display the new table so when the new template is created, it can just be swapped in. Digirami (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Primera Division de Peru seasons naming conventions
Hey,
I see you started moving some of the season articles to the new naming format. I put in a bot request to move the Argentine league seasons. I just have one question for the Peruvian league season. I know you're the Peru guy in the football project. But wouldn't the "XXXX Campeonato Decentralizado" or "XXXX Torneo Decentralizado" be the best naming convention for the applicable season of that league? I see like the Ecuadorian league, where the league is commonly called the Serie A, but the season itself is commonly called the Campeonato Ecuatoriano de Futbol Serie A. Let me know what you think. Slds. Digirami (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think that would be best. If you don't feel like moving them all yourself, request a bot to do it. Digirami (talk) 02:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
CONMEBOL winners list
Cool. Then I guess I'll start on the Copa Sudamericana winners list. Digirami (talk) 08:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Table format dispute
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#CONMEBOL tables and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Jamen Somasu (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Warning
Stale warning. Last warning was issued 3 minutes ago.
Please do not vandalize the project. Thank you. Jamen Somasu (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jamen Somasu (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
- While the above warnings are completely inappropriate I have to remind you that the other parties faults is no justification for you to continue an edit war. Also, when reverting other editors or making potentially controversial edits it is always a good idea to provide a edit summary. Rettetast (talk) 10:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Suspicious image
{{adminhelp}}
Hi, I suspect this file is not under a creative commons or GNU license. There is also no author or source and the image looks like it was found on a website, cropped, and uploaded to Wikipedia under a false license. --MicroX (talk) 18:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Descentralizado 1994
En el torneo descentralizado 1994, no hubo un tercer puesto oficial que daba cupo a la Copa Conmebol, sin embargo a Ciclista Lima se le dio el cupo a la participacion a la Copa Conmebol por quedar segundo puesto en el Torneo Apertura.
WP:FOOTY deletion archive
Hi, I thought I'd just let you know about the WikiProject Football deletion archive, where we archive any footy-related deletion discussions after they have been removed from the main WP:FOOTY page. I have added the discussions for Gerard Deulofeu and Template:Kingstonian F.C. seasons to this page. If you already know about the deletion archive then sorry to have bothered you. Cheers, happy editing and enjoy the World Cup! --Jameboy (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Re:Copa fb round templates
I'm not sure. As long at the text being displayed is correct and the code is universal across the board, I guess it doesn't matter. But if it helps, I would be in favor of moving them (rename). Digirami (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb round2 2007 Copa Libertadores 1S
Template:Fb round2 2007 Copa Libertadores 1S has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MicroX (talk) 21:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Mediation Cabal Case closed
Hello, I've closed the mediation cabal case that you were listed as an involved party in. No action was taken, as the reporter was indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing. An unblock request was also denied, so I'm assuming that this user will not be back (or at least not anytime soon). Netalarmtalk 11:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
You appear to have edited my comment
This edit appears to have done some damage to my signature. I have fixed it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
CSD Declined for War and Peace (miniseries)
Hi. Just to let you know that I declined the speedy deletion of War and Peace (miniseries) as it asserted notability by stating it had been broadcast in more than one country. If an article makes a credible assertion of notability, even if it is unreferenced, it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. A quick search on IMDB reveals that this is a notable article, with a very well known cast. If an article makes a credible claim for notability but you think it should still be deleted, then you should use PROD or AFD. Stephen! Coming... 09:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
South American football as a FT
Seeing that you and Digirami has been the most notable contributors to South American club football competitions, I want to invite you two to help build and promote this project. Personally, I think it is 70% done. Here is the discussion. Jamen Somasu (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
You see...
...I respect the rules; I think they are a necessary backbone in our society. Sure...there are times when one must chose to ignore them (for good reasons) but one should treat the rules as a backbone, a guideline of sorts.
But the rules are simply words and letters; what gives them importance is the way they are carried out. It is like, say, a football tournament: if there is blatant cheating, controversial circumstances without a doubt, and similar cases, then the competition would lose prestigue, importance, and it would matter little.
The rules are very much like that; in here, I was blocked for some BS. I will admit that I could have prevented the situation and acted better; however, it doesn't change the fact that some people here have blatant double-standards that I had to endure personally. And when the rules doesn't apply to everyone on a somewhat equal level, then the rules lose meaning, it becomes pointless, and it transforms into something I can wipe my ass with.
Where does that stem for? Giving the wrong people the wrong tools. I understand there are certain factions that are here solely to protect articles against vandalism (something I have done once or twice to test my theory out), but it seems the emphasis has changed: a great deal of the admin I interact do not try to protect articles, but seems to spend more time blocking users who are deemed "unlikeable", mostly because of difference of opinion (most of the time, it is nothing more than that. I have personally read a great deal of the admin's incident reports for this year).
So yeah...more or less. Plus, Digirami is a dumbass. I know he is getting pissed off (which I take great pleasure on), but mostly, I do it because he thinks he own the articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.93.60 (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ha! You respecting rules is a funny concept. You can't even respect a block... A block you rightfully deserved (and it's not just my opinion). Digirami (talk) 03:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- R.e. your post on my talkpage MicroX, it's theoretically possible. Whether WMF can do that itself is a moot point- if things got serious enough they would contact the authorities. My following contribution to the page should clarify what constitutes "serious enough". Regards, --WFC-- 05:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Primera Argentina
Huh. Well do I have egg on my face for misreading that. Corrections have to be made. But, do keep in mind this quote from the regulations: "En ningún caso podrán participar de la Copa "Santander" Libertadores, ni de la Copa “Nissan” Sudamericana, los clubs que desciendan de Categoría (Punto 9), o deban disputar las promociones (Punto 10)." If I understand that and point 10 correctly, any team that plays in the relegation/promotion playoff are not eligible. Digirami (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Egg on my face (embarrassed) because I totally misread the rules and read average instead of aggregate. That's why we had average tables. No worries now. Problem solved. Digirami (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Fb r header
Hi MicroX,
I recently discovered that around two dozen articles, mostly covering Peruvian leagues, still use the deprecated {{Fb r header}} for creating results tables. Could you please modify the respective articles to use {{Fb r2 header}} instead? :-) The reason behind this request is that I want to get rid of the r version of the header in the near future, in order to move the r2 version into the "old" r namespace to achieve some naming consistency. Cheers, Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 00:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind, I have also asked Ericystephi (talk · contribs) for help since he currently seems to be on a mission regarding Peruvian season articles of all kind. ^_^--Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 00:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- The reason for the missing codes is that the respective team templates do not have the abb parameter included. So, everything to do is to "add the abb". In general, the code of a complete team template should look as following:
{{fb team |t=Sporting Cristal |tan=Sporting Cristal |tc=PER |abb={{#if:{{{abb|}}}|CRI}} |oc={{#if:{{{oc|}}}|{{{oc}}} }} }}<!-- --><noinclude>[[Category:Fb_team_templates Peru]]</noinclude>
- The example hopefully is self-explanatory; if not, feel free to drop a line. As for the 2007 Torneo Descentralizado – I have amended the involved team templates, so these could be used as examples as well. For convenience, here is the link to Category:Fb team templates Peru. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peru U20 2011.png
A tag has been placed on File:Peru U20 2011.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peru U-20 2011.png
A tag has been placed on File:Peru U-20 2011.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust Talk Contribs 14:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:El nacional stadium.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:El nacional stadium.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
