Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sony Exmor image sensors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sony Exmor image sensors

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. This was formerly part of the Exmor article, but a discussion resulted in a consensus to remove this list from the article and recommend it go to an alternative forum. If it shouldn't be in the article itself, it shouldn't be a standalone article. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That ABSOLUTELY doesn't follow! Lists are often detached from articles by agreement. Johnbod (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of those are done for space reasons only, and would be valid content if in the article itself. This was made to replace its removal from the article. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Technology. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NLIST, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTADVERT, etc. etc. etc. Most of the list is entirely unsourced and the rest is poorly sourced—primary sources, unreliable sources, copies of specs on affiliate sites, reviews on affiliate sites, etc. I looked for sources when commenting on the RfC mentioned above and did not see any that cover this list as a group or set as required by NLIST. Woodroar (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too many references are to primary sources. There does not appear to be sufficient independent references to support the requirements of the page. I suggest that any entries with good references be added as text to the Exmor page. Gusfriend (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTDIRECTORY WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Clearly not encyclopedic. Ajf773 (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to WP:NLIST, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTDATABASE, and WP:NOTADVERT. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.