Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jereme Tendler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jereme Tendler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: NN hockey player, fails NHOCKEY's criteria. Played exclusively in Division II college hockey, the low minors and the semi-pro British league. Ravenswing 07:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Technically he passes WP:NHOCKEY by being a First-Team All Star in the EIHL. -DJSasso (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Djsasso:, no he does not pass NHOCKEY. Look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment. The EIHL does not satisfy criteria #4 of being a first-team all-star. Joeykai (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't notice someone slid some different wording in there. Generally all professional leagues fell under #4 that weren't listed in the top 2. That was sort of the point of #4, to catch all other pro leagues. -DJSasso (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upon closer inspection it looks like that league was actually removed without discussion so its been re-added. It is easily as high a level as a number of the leagues on that list. -DJSasso (talk) 16:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say so. Ice hockey receives little to almost no media coverage in the UK, and its leagues tend to be ephemeral. By contrast, the Norwegian and Italian top leagues are 80 and 90 years old respectively. Ice hockey is Norway's second most popular team sport, and the Norwegian team consistently plays at the Championship tier of the Worlds, while Italy plays in the second rung. Ravenswing 17:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well we can take that discussion to the talk page there. I can certainly entertain the idea that its not a super high league. But the British leagues get considerably more international coverage than Italy does but perhaps domestically it doesn't. Either way this keep is a weak keep from me. -DJSasso (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although in looking on the BBC site I am now finding some articles about a drug situation so I am betting I can find more references. -DJSasso (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added a couple, there were more easily found in google news. -DJSasso (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've just read NHockey and it doesn't have a settled or coherent position - as the above discussion demonstrates. So we're back to GNG and he doesn't pass. Szzuk (talk) 22:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 09:31, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Joeykai and Szzuk clearly Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.