Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huntley Fitzpatrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 02:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huntley Fitzpatrick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NAUTHOR and GNG John from Idegon (talk) 04:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 08:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 08:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this is now better notable and improvable. Delete as my searches found links at Books, News, browsers and Highbeam but perhaps not enough for a convincingly better notable article. Notifying Tokyogirl79, LaMona and DGG who frequently participate at these AfDs as often as I. SwisterTwister talk 22:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR, a search brings up lots of reviews which I will list after chrissy Coolabahapple (talk) 16:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - reviews in nn publications don't do much to show notability. John from Idegon (talk) 10:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here are some (mostly) reviews of her books (looking at previous afds, you will find that most/all of these sources are deemed okay) - The boy most likely to: PW - [1], School Library Journal - [2], theYoungFolks.com - [3], Paste magazine - [4]; and My Life Next Door: The Boston Globe (this review is extremely short but sweet:)) - [5], Publishers Weekly - [6], Lauren Morrill (I know she has no wikiarticle(yet:)) - [7], Kirkus Review - [8]; and What I thought was true: PW - [9], Kirkus Review - [10], BookList and School Library Journal - [11]. I have added these to the article.Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and speedy close. The many reviews of her work now cited in the article are more than sufficient to demonstrate notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A WP:AUTHOR pass per multiple independent book reviews from reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.