Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashli Orion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ashli Orion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only award won isnt significant and her co-winner has just been deleted for beining non notable. Fails pornbio and gng Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She won the award. Why are we nominating winners now? If there is a consensus that the Urban X Award is non-notable, please link to it. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 04:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Kox. The same awardgiver, the same award category, even the same year (tie vote). The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The award is non-notable. Winning a non-notable award does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - winner, meets of PORNBIO. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 19:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merely pointing a policy without explanation is an argument to avoid listed at WP:JUSTAPOLICY. Mkdw ^talk 01:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As other winners of Urban X winners have been deleted that didn't have other means of notability, even ones who were Hall of Fame inductees. It's too bad they couldn't run a more legit awards show, as ethnic performers (blacks especially) are usually ignored by AVN, XRCO and Xbiz for the most part. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 00:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PORNBIO & GNG, Ofcourse this has nothing to do with looks and it has nothing to do with this image... –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin, what Davey2010 actually means is that this is a non-policy based HOTTIE vote as he can't bring himself to go with policy for this individual. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:33, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think that'll be my mission next year - To create WP:HOTTIE and make it a fully-fledged policy, Sure that would go down well . –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 23:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's accurate analysis and consensus practice. The consensus that the Urban X/Urban Spice Award fails to demonstrate notability has been established by repeated AFD and DRV discussions. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:ANYBIO states, "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times." I argue that the award is not well known which was the intent of this guideline, to not simply to merit all award winners notability. Additionally, it only suggests notability is likely because presumably there will be WP:SIGCOV. Most of the sources in the article are there only to cite titles in the filmography section, not to substantiate the lightly spread material in the article. There doesn't seem to be significant coverage about this individual because of their career or being the recipient of this award. I do not think the keep camp has addressed these concerns. Mkdw ^talk 00:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per consensus that there are no notable awards here. FeatherPluma (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some degree of onsistency is a virtue, even at WP. the way we treat analogous people is relevant. DGG ( talk ) 10:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is not fully satisfying the pornography notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 18:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.