Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abuta bullata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abuta bullata

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced wall of text, could possibly be merged into the main species article. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 14:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 14:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and South America. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~Delete, see also a notice on the talk page here, I don't think there will be any intention on improving any of the mass-created unsourced articles.~~ microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 15:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Updated following significant article improvements by Significa liberdade. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 16:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 15:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NSPECIES. The plant clearly exists. This article has the plant name in the title, and it's included in various plant guides, as now shown on the page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep obviously - for validly described recent taxa, we maintain articles at the species level. Admittedly this was the worst possible logorrhoea dump before the recent improvements, but those improvements were readily made. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because it was a lightly warmed over copy and paste of https://www.selinawamucii.com/plants/menispermaceae/abuta-bullata/ ("© 2023 Selina Wamucii"). Uncle G (talk) 20:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just for clarity, I added some sources, but I did not add actual content to the page. The original editor had "headings" in the source text that were incorrectly done. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [reply]
    - That's one indicator of a copy-and-paste job. The headings were in the original, in the same order as they are in Special:Permalink/1192070528. But most copy and paste mechanisms don't preserve the formatting. So they are apparent in the raw wikitext, as here, but come out as unformatted sentence fragents in the rendered page, also as here. Uncle G (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article "is" the main species article. Loopy30 (talk) 03:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.