(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 05:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noble Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to be written as an advertisement (see ==Awards==), and seems to be a pretty obscure company. Schuddeboomw (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as basically nothing listed is enough the applicable notability, nothing else even minimally convincing of better solid coverage. SwisterTwister talk 07:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's clearly a noteworthy Nevada-based firm. But it doesn't seem to meet WP:COMPANY or more specifically WP:AUD just yet. Most of the coverage of the Lopiccolos and their firm appears to be of the press release variety. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.