(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tarih-ül Mümin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tarih-ül Mümin

Tarih-ül Mümin (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

27 June 2024[edit]

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

User created some weeks after Tarih-ül Mümin was indeffed.

Wiawolo's first edits was this very well formatted article [1]. This is not the traditional journey of a new user. The only major difference between these two users is one is more talkative than the other, but there's no doubt something fishy going on imo.

Extremely similar edits;

EDIT: The plot thickens. So I looked into the /32 range of the afromentioned rangeblocked IP and saw that they made some pretty noticeable changes to the infobox of Battle of Qahrawa [7] [8], which User:Hipow12 who created the (newly) article didn't revert, in fact they added more onto the IPs edits, so they're likely the same person. And then I noticed, Hipow12 is a sock who was blocked on 21 June 2024 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blurewhale11), only three days before Wiawolo created their user account. In fact, like Wiawolo, Hipow12 and their socks are also fond of making drafts [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. Therefore I have added Hipow12 as well, hope I didn't mess anything up. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the plot thickened even further! Nice catch Aintabli, completely forgot about Heval. At this rate I need to compile a folder of the all the active socks to keep track lol. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]