Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romansh Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Flowerparty☀ 01:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Romansh Wikipedia[edit]
- Romansh Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable Wiki language site, article has only 3,000 article and its risen slowly. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 16:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Wikipedias per the sentiments expressed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gan Wikipedia (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Sámi Wikipedia. Cunard (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, like all the other small Wikipedia versions without evidence of notability. Fram (talk) 07:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- weak Keep, leaning to redirect. Unlike the two cited cases, there are sources, although scarce, about this wikipedia, and some nontrivial info. List of wikipedias is ...er... just a list, with format not suited to store encyclopedic information. As for notability and growth, it is reasonably proportional to the number of speakers: clearly within 35,000 speakers there will be ten thousand less volunteers than among 40,000,000 English speakers. - Altenmann >t 16:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. Still, there are only 5 active contributors. I guess, a hobby of 5 is of dubious notability, unless, they, say, get a national award for this job or something (like Andres Luure). Therefore I changed my vote to a weaker one. - Altenmann >t 16:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.