Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Plaza, Hong Kong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Private housing estates in Sha Tin District#Lucky Plaza. J04n(talk page) 19:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Plaza, Hong Kong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable. No reliable sources, little content. Adrian Dakota (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reserved. I previously created this article because Lucky Plaza is one of the largest and famous private housing estates in Sha Tin Town Centre in Hong Kong. It is notable. Also, I found that people usually asked for article deletion because in fact they do not know what the article describes only. I objected this subjective thinking. Ricky@36 (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage reliable sources. Editor of articles starting with L (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Private housing estates in Sha Tin District#Lucky Plaza. I don't believe individual housing estates warrant separate articles unless they meet WP:GNG, which this one appears not to have. The sources on the page document that the place WP:EXISTS, not that it is in anyway notable. The only additional information that the page provides is a list of bus routes running to and from the estate. Housing estates are quite common in Hong Kong, so having an article for each one may violate WP:NOTDIR. Funny ^Pika! 04:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.