Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of corruption scandals in Romania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of corruption scandals in Romania[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a BLP nightmare. While some appear to be RSourced others appear to not have as great a sourcing. Caffeyw (talk) 09:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Move to List of political scandals in Romania, as articles on other countries' scandals are titled in this manner. Page seems reliably sourced enough to keep. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Each entry is sourced from a mainstream Romanian press source.
If the problem is that there's just one source for each entry, then I can provide more of them, these cases were widely covered in the Romanian press.

If the problem is that you consider certain sources unreliable, please say which of them are the problem. I consider them RS.

Only the corruption scandals that were officially investigated by the Romanian judiciary (or a foreign equivalent) were included, not just allegations by other politicians or journalists, so I don't think this is a problem with BPL; I included only national and county-level office-holders or city mayors, so I did not include "lower rank" scandals (village mayors, city councilers, etc) as the people involved would have not been notable to warrant an article; most of these people involved (MPs, ministers, mayors) are notable and have articles on Romanian Wikipedia. Agent al rușilor (talk) 17:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.