Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Wan

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2023 September 21.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. This was speedily deleted 3 times already. This deletion is the fourth. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Wan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Passes neither WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Was de-prodded without rationale. Searches turned up nothing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - none of the refs used actually back up their use in the article. Should this person every become well known the article can be recreated. MarnetteD|Talk 02:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Marnette. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No verifiable credits found for listed filmography. Never mind notability--there's not even evidence that this isn't a hoax. --Finngall ^talk 04:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article was speedied twice earlier today and once in 2010. In addition, there were two attempts at creating Grace wan in 2010. Recommend salting both titles if consensus is for deletion. --Finngall ^talk 04:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Absolute lack of significance and sourcing. Was created yesterday a few times apparently by the subject; now created by a "new" account. No notability, no verifiability, no justification for an article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm thinking about closing this per WP:SNOW. To be honest, there's just nothing out there and I can't find anything on her IMDb profile or elsewhere that would show that she would pass GNG. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened up a SPI as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.