Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Waitzkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 13:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Waitzkin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still questionable for the needed solid independent notability and my searches at Books, News, browsers and Highbeam are not finding anything better than expected mentions, nothing at all confidently better to improve this article. At best, this could (whether deleted entirely or not) be redirected to either his son or the film especially since it seems he's best known for the book-film. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable author, verifiable through multiple cited references to reliable, independent, secondary sources, of which I have added a dozen citations (plenty of more also on Highbeam); meets criterion #3 for creative professionals as the author of the book Searching for Bobby Fischer: The Father of a Prodigy Observes the World of Chess that was turned into the Academy Award-nominated film Searching for Bobby Fischer. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 21:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sam Sailor, clearly notable. SwisterTwister, did you do any research at all? It could have easily confirmed notability. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 21:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources sufficient to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 08:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.