User contributions for Kyogul
Appearance
A user with 169 edits. Account created on 22 September 2015.
11 July 2024
- 20:1020:10, 11 July 2024 diff hist +29 African diaspora fixed notes current Tag: Visual edit
- 20:0720:07, 11 July 2024 diff hist +945 African diaspora fixed notes Tag: Visual edit
8 July 2024
- 23:1123:11, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora refusing to respond in talk threads undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on. Tag: Undo
- 21:3921:39, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:3721:37, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:3421:34, 8 July 2024 diff hist +1,864 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 21:3421:34, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:3021:30, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:2821:28, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:2521:25, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:1821:18, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora undoing edits from an edit war this guy is on Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:0721:07, 8 July 2024 diff hist +507 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0521:05, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 m African diaspora missing figures doesn't undo the correct figures. Xuxo has had a history of whitewashing demographic figures for multiple latin american countries' bio pages Tags: Undo Reverted
- 21:0021:00, 8 July 2024 diff hist +267 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5620:56, 8 July 2024 diff hist +897 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4720:47, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 African diaspora keep the discussion in the talk pages. undoing biased edits Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:1420:14, 8 July 2024 diff hist +1,350 User talk:Xuxo →Continuing making biased edits to the African diaspora article: new section current Tag: New topic
- 20:0820:08, 8 July 2024 diff hist +768 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:0020:00, 8 July 2024 diff hist +883 m African diaspora not my view, based off of studies as well as what the Brazilian census says (IBGE) Tags: Undo Reverted
7 July 2024
- 01:0501:05, 7 July 2024 diff hist +3,068 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →African diaspora: new section
- 00:3600:36, 7 July 2024 diff hist +5,173 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:2000:20, 7 July 2024 diff hist +1,369 African diaspora Undid revision 1233045331 by Xuxo (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 00:0300:03, 7 July 2024 diff hist +1,369 African diaspora i've linked multiple genetic studies showcasing pardos across the country in every region having significant african ancestry. user who disputes this has been asked repeatedly to showcase otherwise with sources and has yet to provide it Tags: Undo Reverted
6 July 2024
- 23:4723:47, 6 July 2024 diff hist +1,369 African diaspora Undid revision 1233040138 by Xuxo (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:4222:42, 6 July 2024 diff hist +2,609 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:1722:17, 6 July 2024 diff hist +1,369 African diaspora No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit
- 15:5115:51, 6 July 2024 diff hist +2,286 User talk:Ben MacDui →Request needed for bad-faith user mass undoing cited edits: new section current Tag: New topic
- 15:3315:33, 6 July 2024 diff hist −225 African diaspora No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit
- 15:1815:18, 6 July 2024 diff hist −225 African diaspora Undid revision 1232945580 by Xuxo (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 10:5510:55, 6 July 2024 diff hist +1,466 User talk:Xuxo →You're contributing to misinformation and vandalism on the African diaspora thread: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:4110:41, 6 July 2024 diff hist −225 African diaspora Undid revision 1232886686 by Xuxo (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
5 July 2024
- 16:4416:44, 5 July 2024 diff hist +2,816 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1113:11, 5 July 2024 diff hist +2,211 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:5212:52, 5 July 2024 diff hist −225 African diaspora No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit
- 12:5112:51, 5 July 2024 diff hist +201 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
28 June 2024
- 09:3409:34, 28 June 2024 diff hist +2,589 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: Reply Tag: Reply
27 June 2024
- 14:1714:17, 27 June 2024 diff hist +1,881 N User talk:2804:6F80:C069:4E00:6568:8860:AFA6:590B →[African Diaspora] do the talking in the Talk section, not in edits notes: new section current Tag: New topic
- 14:1614:16, 27 June 2024 diff hist +482 User talk:2804:6F80:C069:4E00:9587:F399:5777:C888 No edit summary current
- 14:1414:14, 27 June 2024 diff hist +1,320 N User talk:2804:6F80:C069:4E00:9587:F399:5777:C888 ←Created page with 'I already made a thread in the Talk tab section so if you want to argue there that's more than fine but it's inappropriate to do it in edits, particularly when it's both false information. I already gave sources in the notes such as [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040205/ here], [http://www.ufcg.edu.br/prt_ufcg/assessoria_imprensa/mostra_noticia.php?codigo=5289 here], and even this one where it showcases [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...' Tag: New topic
- 14:0314:03, 27 June 2024 diff hist −228 African diaspora I gave multiple academic sources in the notes, which for some reason everyone's ignoring which showcases in technicality pardo brazilians would be mulattoes depending on the region with prominent african ancestry, and other geneaologists saying african ancestry is only excluded to 1st~2nd generation immigrants. if i need to just continuously edit this back, i will Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit
21 June 2024
- 22:0222:02, 21 June 2024 diff hist +1,393 Talk:African diaspora →Brazil's afrodescendant population figure: new section Tag: New topic
- 21:5221:52, 21 June 2024 diff hist +777 N User talk:166.181.89.85 →Your reasoning is folly, please do your research next time before editing: new section current Tag: New topic
- 21:4821:48, 21 June 2024 diff hist +1,579 African diaspora Please read studies before editing it with folly reasoning. The average African ancestry of a Brazilian is over 20%, and multiracial people in the UK and US also apply for low percentages. You either use low percentages across the board or you don't at all. Tags: Manual revert Visual edit
- 13:4913:49, 21 June 2024 diff hist +1,555 African diaspora Restored to the version with most accuracy. Please keep consistency with countries and use the same standards as well as sources without any biases, i.e. if multiple countries get to have their mixed afrodescendant populations count then so does Brazil. This will be edited if it happens again Tags: Manual revert Visual edit
29 May 2024
- 07:4507:45, 29 May 2024 diff hist −26 African diaspora The Brazil population is correct if we are including multiracial people for the US and UK Tags: Manual revert Visual edit
16 May 2024
- 07:5307:53, 16 May 2024 diff hist 0 African diaspora fixed in accordance of the actual order Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5007:50, 16 May 2024 diff hist 0 African diaspora No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4907:49, 16 May 2024 diff hist −95 African diaspora No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4807:48, 16 May 2024 diff hist +52 African diaspora edited source, made a mistake Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4707:47, 16 May 2024 diff hist +42 m African diaspora it is nonsensical and inconsistent to including multiracial americans with african ancestry but not do the same for brazil. The figure that was listed for the US (and UK) included multiracial people but excluded it for Brazil. Tag: Visual edit