(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)
Jump to content

User talk:Miha2020

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Miha2020 (talk | contribs) at 16:06, 8 June 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 2022

I was shocked. that's terrible mistake. I am not online for a few days (I am in travel) and I will say my words soon.--Miha2020 (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was really busy in my real life. i'll say about SPI and explain about my edits and then ask for unblock soon.--Miha2020 (talk) 10:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello. 2 months passed from this bad event for me. I apologize in advance that my speaks will be long (in few parts). first i want to say that is terrible mistake. i am not this person and i know the policy about Sockpuppetry. i saw that page (SPI), user:MarioGom words are funny. i was editing in wiki with ipies before and in tokyo 2020 (my name 2020 comes from this), I started to edit with an account. i only have this user. about edits summaries: i read and see many users activities (history of pages) and learned from them, many users can have same things i can point...i am active in iranian's football pages and sports like wrestling weightlifting and...similar pages (compare 2 users) don't show anything, many people edits on their interests. (i can say users edits like me: Shahin, Simeon, Sports2021, Lugnuts and etc). about timeline of my edits: i am active in wiki when i have some free times. forexample you can compare: 1 and 2, Many commonalities but they are not same person! don't know where this issue about me comes from but i am sure that's not true. i can send my passport pic to CheckUsers or ARB Com. At a glance, i saw similar mistake about mojtaba2361 (first he connect to ArmanAfifeh and then it was corrected). for me this has happended again. i read that case.

about my block in fa wiki, i had an argument with an admin for tagging in one page (CSD) and that admin In collaboration with another admin closed my account, my request is open there but unfortunately on that wiki admins are not active too much and they don't check requests like that. It had nothing to do with the topic Sockpuppetry at all. i am in iran and ipies here are dynamic (checkusers know about this problem in iran). my conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and i am unintentionally blocked as a result because i used the same IP range). clerk said it can be possible but be notice that tools can make mistake. Even if the inspection is certain, mistakes could still happen. so An admin's personal impression of my edits cannot be accurate. human beings can always make mistakes, he can't only block me on evidence (because user:Vanamonde pointed SPI on summary of my block but the checkuser didn't approve it in certain). Vanamonde linked me to ArmanAfifehi and then PeymanNR and then Mojtaba2361! please see this pages: User talk:Mohammad.m.1628, User talk:Acv1006, User talk:Arminedite, User talk:Marouf.ashena (i reported them for multyaccounts, how can i be Sockpuppet like them?).Miha2020 (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miha2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello again. please first read above (to admin). I've read and know wikipedia's policies. I am not vandal .I am good user (see my 6000 edits). i am here to improve wikipedia. i redirected 470 pages see here. i have created olympian persons: An San, Melvin Twellaar, Stef Broenink, Parviz Nasibov, Tadeusz Michalik in many sports for many countries. important pages for world cup 2022 like :2022 FIFA World Cup seeding and 2022 FIFA World Cup officials. events like: 2022 Beach Soccer Intercontinental Cup, 2022 World Taekwondo Championships, 2022 Asian Weightlifting Championships and most viewed page like Gerd Müller Trophy. i am active in many sports. please have WP:AGF and help me especially now that i am a little fluent in editing. best regards. Miha2020 (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't address this in your unblock request. You need to specifically address the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mojtaba2361/Archive. Yamla (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla did you see passage above my request? i explained completely about link you addressed. (about my edits, timeline, my FAwiki block). what answer do you want to know? user:MarioGom said something that is not true. user:vanamonde made wrong and his Personal impressions can't be exact. more than 400 pages as admin blocker said ! i pointed (above) that tools make mistake and humans can too. i know what is WP:SOCK and i am sure that i am not Sockpuppet. how can he (Vanamonde) prove i am him (Mojtaba2361) 100%? Behavioural evidence is guess and It cannot be proven definitively but As I said, I am ready to send the my info to the Checkusers (to you).best regards.Miha2020 (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to make a new request. A different administrator will review it. --Yamla (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yamla i didn't understand why you declined my request. Did you check carefully? what is your reason for decline? did you see my above explanation? if you didn't check carefully let other admins done it and don't close the request. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miha2020 (talk • contribs)
WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yamla Why do you give an irrelevant answer? I know how to apply, but first I need to know your reason for rejecting my application. i don't understand you.--Miha2020 (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already gave a reason for rejecting your unblock request. You are expected to explain why you should be unblocked in your unblock request. You didn't. --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla see above! no reason for your job! i said i am not him (that person). how can i prove it? i suggested the way but you didn't answer it. why you don't have wp:AGF? i'm not vandalism you can see my contributions. i'm here to help wikipedia. Miha2020 (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Make a new unblock request. Another admin will review it. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla You do not answer more because you do not have a convincing answer. You shouldn't have checked this request in the first place when you can't check it properly. An admin blocked me due to behavioral evidence (of course wrong) and suspended me for 4 months unnecessarily, and this is not acceptable for the system. Who is responsible for this misconception? Miha2020 (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Miha2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. 7 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. it was for Behavioural evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism (see my 6000 edits) and i have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 7 months. this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have wp:AFN and help me. Best regards. Miha2020 (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello. 7 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. it was for Behavioural evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism (see my 6000 edits) and i have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 7 months. this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have [[wp:AFN]] and help me. Best regards. [[User:Miha2020|Miha2020]] ([[User talk:Miha2020#top|talk]]) 19:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello. 7 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. it was for Behavioural evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism (see my 6000 edits) and i have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 7 months. this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have [[wp:AFN]] and help me. Best regards. [[User:Miha2020|Miha2020]] ([[User talk:Miha2020#top|talk]]) 19:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello. 7 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. it was for Behavioural evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism (see my 6000 edits) and i have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 7 months. this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have [[wp:AFN]] and help me. Best regards. [[User:Miha2020|Miha2020]] ([[User talk:Miha2020#top|talk]]) 19:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miha2020&oldid=1159153883"