Talk:Density
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Density article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Physics C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
|
"...but not the densest materials." What are the densest materials ? What is denser than osmium ?
Reviewing Cheatsheet
- The following highlights current issues. Feel free to either add the issues you've identified, or to strike them as they've been resolved.
WikiProject Physics' Reviewing Cheatsheet (11:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC))
Do not remove the elements, but rather strike them as they becomes useless or irrelevant (i.e write
<s>text to be struck</s>) to indicate that this element was verified and found to be alright.
If everything in one of the section (i.e everything in one hidden-box has been addressed), strike that particular hidden box's title.
This cheetsheet can be used by anyone.
To add the Reviewing Cheatsheet to an article's talk page, simply place {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Projects of the Week/Reviewing Cheatsheet}} immediately before the first section.
- Add/Expand :
- The following sections needs to be expanded/created :
Lead- Overview !
References- Lists ?
See also
Infoboxes and Navboxes :
- The following navboxes and infoboxes could be useful :
WikiProject Physics templates(browse)Physics navboxes(browse){{Nobel Prize in Physics}}{{Infobox Scientist}}{{Infobox Particle}}
Categorize
- Make sure the article is properly categorized :
- Browse Category:Physics, to find other categories
- Do not overcategorize
- Categorize alphabetically
- Cleanup
- Article MoS Compliance :
- Acronyms and abbreviations are spelled out on first use
- Appropriate use of reference templates
- En dashes, em dashes, hyphens, and minus signs are properly used
- External Links
- Images/Diagrams
- Captionned
- Correctly aligned
- Copyediting :
- The following sections needs to be copyedited (give reason) :
- Disambiguation :
- The following elements needs to be disambiguated :
- mass density vs weight density
- Considering referring these section to a main article :
The following elements may be too technical for the casual reader, consider defining and explaining them to non-experts:
- Merge/Split :
- Consider merging or splitting these sections with another article, or merging another article's section with this one (give reason):
- densities of water needs to be split off (too specific for general article)
- density of air already exist (split of most of density of air section and merge) include main
Problems :
- The following problems have been identified :
- Requests :
- Consider making a request to these people (give reason):
- Talk Page :
Archive old and irrelevant discussions- Consider structuring discussion according to "topics"
- Sort boxes in this order (consider adding them if they aren't there):
{{skiptotoctalk}}{{talkheader}}- {{ArticleHistory}}
- Wikiprojects (browse to find other relevant projects)
- If there are more than one WikiProject, use {{WikiProjectBanners}} and order them alphabetically within the banner.
- WP 0.5/1.0 Editorial Team,
- WP Echo
- Other boxes
- To do box
Archive box
- Update importance and rating
Update :
- These sections or statements are out of date :
- Verify :
- The following needs to be verified :
- Factual accuracy
- References
- Name of the article
- Up-to-date-ness
- Wikilink :
- The following elements needs to be wikilinked :
- People
- Experiments
- First use of units
- Dates (but not stand alone years)
- Miscellaneous remarks :
Oddly, while properly coded, the symbol for rho is improper in the definition following the equation (in which rho shows properly (Firefox/Mac OS X). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanbrowne (talk • contribs) 15:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Gravity is a special case of Density with two objects or more
may be, Gravity is a special case of Density the electron does not spin fast enough to merge with the nuclei of the atom, i.e. lower mass/vacuum energy momentum torque of electron to that of the nuclei of the atom, may be because of the electron's smaller mass radius in comparison to the atom's larger radius. when moving to a higher vacuum energy density (may be because larger mass of the nuclei accumulate larger vacuum energy vector near or on it's surface with it's own torque momentum with vacuum energy)near the nuclei of the atom: electron loses photon because it must spin faster (higher torque momentum of the electron's matter surface resistance vector and the vacuum energy vector which leads to a higher spin of the electron),noting: lower energy vacuum space energy with higher energy matter of the electron and/or the nuclei of the atom. density= matter/vacuum energy--99.109.130.141 (talk) 03:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)--e:Y,?:G 03:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I have initiated this discussion about Density because I have not read an article (or I could not find one) where the topic is: Density of matter in vacuum or Density of matter with respect to vacuum energy, which is very important to physics.--e:Y,?:G 04:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by E:Y,?:G (talk • contribs) in other words, could it be that: if and where matter is inside vacuum i.e. vacuum energy and at vacuum large enough in volume, density = matter/vacuum energy is higher,denser energy medium i.e. matter/lower,lesser energy medium i.e. vacuum energy
then
the lower, lesser energy medium i.e. vacuum energy would want to "dilute" the higher, denser energy medium i.e. matter; therefore, the inward force exerted by lower, lesser energy medium i.e. vacuum energy onto the higher, denser matter.--e:Y,?:G 04:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by E:Y,?:G (talk • contribs)