User talk:Túrelio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Revision as of 16:56, 20 March 2018 by Poeticbent (talk | contribs) (→‎Test files: please help)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


noframe
noframe
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017).

Mijareswik

Hello, I am writing this time to ask: why were deleted some of photos that was for my article? Appassionante I would like to find a solution, I've not get down in copyright violation because all this photos come from directly of the photographer group. can you tell me how can I solve this? please. Mijareswik (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Styles WWE

Hello im Photolover33 and i have this question for you: If this image has a problem can i reupload it as not my own work just to publicity please? Awnser when you can please. I'm waiting goodbye Photolover33

File:Parti européen - Logo.jpg + File tagging File:Parti européen - Affiche.jpg + File tagging File:Louis de Gouyon Matignon.jpg

Hi, I am Louis de Gouyon Matignon, fondator of the Parti européen.This images are mine and they are free to be used. You will find them easely on my website www.louisdegouyonmatignon.com and www.partieuropeen.com.

I am totally clear with this issue you are making. Those are my pictures and I use them as I want.

Thank you very much,

Louis

File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png

Hi. On 8 October 2011, you redirected File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png to File:Blank-map-world-south-up.png with the summary "Redirecting to duplicate file". Actually, the latter was a duplicate of the former. Also, judging by the talk page of the original, the user who created the duplicate, may have actually created a different map. Apparently (I commented on the talk page at the time, though I don't remember), the original was a flipped map, rather than a rotated map like the duplicate. Is there anyway to restore the original? Mclay1 (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undo

Hi, I notice that:

IMO all edits of Buxeria are copyviol.--Pạtạfisik 22:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Patafisik,
thanks for notifying. However, currently I am busy in RL and rarely online. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die WikiEulenAcademy gratuliert zur EhrenEule

Hiermit verleihen wir
Túrelio
die Auszeichnung

EhrenEule
als Anerkennung für
herausragende Arbeit
im Dienste der Verbesserung
unserer Enzyklopädie.
gez. WikiEulenAcademy

Hallo Túrelio,


die WikiEulenAcademy schließt sich nun den Glückwünschen an und gratuliert dir recht herzlich zur WikiEule 2014.

Es ist uns eine Ehre dir neben der Eule für den Schreibtisch eine WikiEule für deine Benutzerseite zu überreichen.

Sollte dir diese zu groß sein, haben wir einen entsprechenden Babel vorbereitet:

Dieser Benutzer ist stolzer Preisträger der EhrenEule 2014.

Danke, für deine tatkräftige Unterstützung.

Wir wünschen dir noch viel Freude und hoffen auf weitere großartige Beiträge.

Vielleicht sieht man sich auch bei anderen Treffen oder der nächsten WikiCon wieder?


Liebe Grüße,
die WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 01:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank, welche Ehre! Schade, dass ich am Samstagabend schon nicht mehr in Köln war und die Verleihung deshalb verpasst habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Túrelio Good Morning

I received a dire or disturbing message here [2] to which I replied forthwith; [3] and another reply; with all due resepec, I cannot understand why after more than 101,000 edit files I upload only since February this year, 2014, I am attacked and accused of many bad things; as you see in my reply, I only not opted or chose to create 2 categories and rather placed the category in one Category as sub-category; I am accused of violating the Rules on Meta or Over-Categorization; but the accuser failed to point to me the specific provision or rule that I violated; I deny the violation, for I am faithfully adhering to the rules; the thing speaks for itself; good faith in editing is presummed; no editor or administraor has messaged me on this, but only this editor, since I started this February, 2014; It is very painful and terrifying to edit and contribute and at the same time being personally attacked; Please, with your kindness and integrity give me some protection, and if I am wrong, please help me be corrected; I chose not to use my user name but just an IP Address for reasons of security. Muchas gracias Túrelio--124.106.77.79 04:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm busy in RL. I'll try to look into in the evening. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you time, Túrelio. I forthwith received in my talk page, a more dire message in this manner which I am quoting because of its importance and I underscore it, to wit: ::::* Sorry xxx I have given up on xxx He just does his own thing, thinking that his pictures will make "Commons a better place for researchers", "a wiser tool of knowledge for the future" and "benefit in the future". Obviously he is thinking way too much of himself and his pictures! But really, he is using Commons as his personal storage device. We have told him many times to be selective, to categorize properly, even to add better descriptions. Even after pointing out the problem, he still doesn't go back to his uploads to correct them, but leaves it to others to clean up after him. That shows that either he doesn't understand English, or he is too arrogant to care. We should just dump all his pictures in a special category like Category:Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category:Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... [4];

Will all my 101,000 files [5] since February 2014, disappear

And does User: P199 which, as is shown the other account or alternate of User:Briar fallen, have the power, administrative or otherwise, to delete all my 101,000 photos and dump them in hidden category as these Users P 199 and Briar fallen decide to dump in ""a special category like Category: Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category: Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... as they proclaimed, announced and stated? Hence, all my photos are rendered nugatory, hidden and can no longer be found in Commons and Wikipedia, is this for real? Please help me, thanks, Very sincerely yours.--124.106.77.79 14:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grund der Angelrute, warum zwei Konten?

Ich habe ein zweites Konto beste Turelio instant Rute unter dem Benutzernamen, dass mehr auf Ihr erklärt habe ich erstellt. Ich bin so Peter van der Sluijs. ich nur die Grundausbildung Fotograf. also abgeschlossen haben ich verbessert Dateien hochgeladen haben. Ich habe viele besondere Fotos mit Wikipedia von dort teilen möchtest. Verständnis für Menschen zustimmen, die Licht und Autist wie ich sind.Wikipedia ist manchmal sehr schwierig für mich.Große Dateien hochladen möchte bleiben. Großen Einsatz von Übersetzungs-Tools durch den Computer damit zu machen

Ich bin schon Gambia heuer, 22. November 2014 zu diesem Foto Bericht. Datum 7 November. die alten Bilder sind von 1998 drin, ich habe, einige Dateien verbessert, so dass Menschen können sie auch für Bettwäsche etc. Fragen sie mindestens 1 mb

Die letzten 100 Fotos auf meinem Konto sind Reisen Gambia Angelrute 7 November bis 22. November 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishengel (talk • contribs)

Hello

A Very Good Day to You !!!

Yesterday I saw this -> FOP case,and afterwards thought to bring forward some of my pages to your consideration,These are some of my Photographs in Commons (see below),If you think that they too come under this law,please feel free to delete them without further discussion,because I don't want to break the prevailing law in my country (Sri Lanka),notification is not necessary,NB:There could be more such Photographs in my uploads which are NOT listed below,Thanks.

1 Regency Hotel I 2 Regency Hotel II 3 SAITM I 4 SAITM II 5 SAITM III 6 SAITM IV 7 SAITM Hospital I 8 SAITM Hospital II 9 SAITM Hospital III 10 SAITM Hospital IV 11 Polgahawela Monastery 12 MIT 13 SLIIT Engineering Department

--MediaJet talk 11:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Túrelio

Jermboy entwickelt zur Zeit wieder ungeahnte Energien. Ich habe den ja schon mit gefälschten Verkehrszeichen (seine Leidenschaft) seit Jahren am Knie. Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Leider kann ich so meinen neuen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen nur sehr langsam vorantreiben, da ich durch Jermboy vielfach hier gebunden werde und nun wirklich keinen Bock habe den ganzen Tag am Rechner zuzubringen, zumal es ja noch das RL gibt. Leider mußte ich auch meinen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen vorzeitig aus meinem Namensraum in den Artikelbereich bringen, da mich auch da Jermboy schon störte. Und ich hatte Angst daß mir das passiert, was dereinst schon der unsägliche Benutzer Korrekturen einst gemacht hat. Der hat nämlich auch Artikel angelegt, die andere schon in Vorbereitung hatten. Das hat er bei mir auch mal gemacht. So steht er nun als Artikelbegründer in den Analen, obwohl er nur einen winzigen Stub produzierte. Das war sehr ärgerlich. Solche Artikel baut auch niemand mehr groß aus. Mediatus (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Предупреждение.

Спасибо за предупреждение.К сожалению пошел по пути стандартных грабель.Впредь отнесусь к загрузкам более осмотрительно. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denis.TW (talk • contribs)


Image Raymi-Phénix.jpg

Bonjour,
je me permets de vous contacter, car le 30/05/2015 Mad'Gic Dream à envoyer un mail à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org concernant cette photo pour donner l'autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous les licences GFDL / CC-BY-4.0 :
"Madame, Monsieur,
Notre association est l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de la photo publiée à l'adresse <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Photo-raymi-phenix.jpg>.
Nous donnons notre autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous les licences GFDL / CC-BY-4.0
Je comprends qu'en faisant cela, je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence.
Nous sommes conscients de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées.
Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc.
Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.
Fait à Arenthon, le 30/05/2015
René Calcas
Président
Mad'Gic Dream Association loi 1901
15, chemin Dumonal, 74800 Arenthon
+33 6 81 64 27 36
info@madgicdream.com"

Étant avec le président de l association hier soir et à notre grande surprise la photo avait été supprimée. Nous avons donc pris le temps et il a décidé de faire un compte Flickr pour Raymi ce qui été le plus simple a ses yeux, car il devait en créer un de toute manière.
Vous faut-il un mail du président pour prouver la réalité des faits ?
Nous comprenons toutefois qu'en effet vous ne pouviez pas savoir et nous aurions surement fait la même chose à votre place.
LA page peut-elle être restaurée ?
Bien à vous --Taenarra (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je suis actuellement trop malade pour y faire face. Peut-être que ça marchera lundi. (sorry, for Google-translation) --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Destruction of redirects

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems #Destruction of redirects by CAPTAIN RAJU and Túrelio. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm currently too ill to take care about that. Maybe I'll be a bit fitter tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Duro

Hello, I saw the message. the truth is, i spoke to the man who run the sport shop in my neighbour and he told me it's fine. Yesterday i went there to buy an inter shirt and i saw this panorama picture of duro and i asked him to make a picture. I don't have any evidence to convince you for it but i'm not lying. I've done the same before with a Dinamo tirana poster (you can see it at my uploads) in a restaurant. Please remove it, it is not a copyright. -- Sadsadas, 8 March 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsadas (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sadsadas,
this is not about believing you or not. First I would like to know what thing did you actually take a picture of (in other words, on what thing is the depicted photo on)? I cannot recognize it, is it a framed photo-print, a screen, a drinking glass or what? --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a framed photo-print, it is in the entry of the shop. --Sadsadas (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, i can make another photo in daylight so you can see it better. --Sadsadas (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC

No, that's not necessary. Thanks.
The decisive question is now: who created the original photo of Klodian Duro? Because only he/she can give us/you a permission. With "creating" I mean, took his camera, went to the soccer stadium or whereever the photo has originally been shot, shot the image. Sitting in front of the TV and making a screenshot in the right moment is not valid.
If the owner of the shop bought this image somewhere else, he has only the right to "use" the physical printed image. But he cannot (legally) multiply or copy it or even give you permission, because it is not his own work.
Problem is, most people in the world have no idea about copyright, not in your country, not in my country. People buy a contemporary painting (the original) for a lot of money and think, now it's my own, I can do what I want. They are wrong. The copyright over the painting is still with the painter, even if he sold the physical painting. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion removed

Hi, you removed the speedy delete tag from a list of images that easily meet the requirements for speedy delete. Why? If I added the heading in a manner that's incorrect, would you mind telling me what is proper? These images don't fall under standard DR. They are stills from a video that has been deleted for copyright violation. Thanks. Rosepoussiere (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion for a deletion request? Agree with Túrelio – this was utterly lame. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
hi Incnis Mrsi: I posted this here asking for help, as clearly I'd done something wrong, but I didn't understand what. Do you mind explaining? I wasn't looking to be called "lame" but to ask about protocols. thanks, and have a wonderful day Rosepoussiere (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosepoussiere, when a speedy-template (any kind of) is inserted into a deletion-request (on the image-page and/or the discussion page), then this DR and the common page for all DRs filed on the same day, are listed in the speedy-deletion category and might possibly become speedy-deleted by an inattentive admin (me included), which would be a desaster. That's what mainly behind my edit. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio, thanks for explaining. Is there a different way to mark them for speedy delete? In fact, that is what these images are. There's no debate or ambiguity about them, since they derive from a nonexistent source. But perhaps anyone can alter them from speedy delete to DR and once that's done, there is no re-tagging them for speedy delete? thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosepoussiere (talk • contribs) 17:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, you could just put a copyvio-tag on each of the images. However, I would not recommend that, as the DR is ongoing. Nevertheless, I've notified my admin-colleague Sealle, who was also the uploader, about consent to speedy-closure of the DR. So, for the moment, you can just sit back and watch the process take its course. :-) --Túrelio (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio,
There is a kind of weird activity I would like to draw your attention to. Seems like this user came here for one reason and one reason only – to get rid of Rachel Kushner photos. Please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rachel Kushner March 2015 in Zürich, Switzerland.jpg and [6]. I feel unimpressed about these attempts to dictate to the community, which photos are to be used in articles. Now, let's stick to the issue. Here's what the result of a deletion for copyright violations on YouTube looks like: [7] [8] and this is definitely not the same as in our case: [9] or [10] (depends on your settings). This apparently was a courtesy deletion, so I really did not like those groundless accusations of copyright infringement on my talk page. Accordingly, I see no reason to follow their desire and now I would prefer a regular DR. In case that video has been deleted by YouTube not for copyright concerns, then my uploads were OK because the license was irrevocable. Sealle (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC) UPD: I find this case similar to another one, when the subject did her best to force deleting all her photos and became happy only when a foppish one has been uploaded instead. Sealle (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
what is the similarity? that image is not a video still, and it's not from a deleted source. I'm very confused. what does foppishness have to do with it? that's a funny image you posted, but this discussion seems to be straying into some other territory. this issue is about putting images on creative commons that have no creative commons attribution, correct? thanks Rosepoussiere (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
: just responding here since this is about me. It's true that I originally asked an administrator about the image you link to, and in response, you posted many images of the author Rachel Kushner that are all stills from a video that was incorrectly declared as creative commons by librerie mollat, who were then informed of their error by the french publisher edition stock, and they immediately removed the video: they deleted themselves, thus the copyright violation notice would not appear. I alerted wikimedia that those images are pulled from a source that no longer exists. How is this weird? I respect the process of administration, and appreciate the work you do to uphold both copyright laws, and communal standards. In this case, there is no source, so the images should be deleted. Thanks, Rosepoussiere (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Brochure MeCoaching Voorkant.jpg

Dear Túrelio, Thank you for checking Commons for copyright violations and removing if appropriate. Please look closer when you delete a file according to a google search. The 22.800.000 hit may indicate that the file is licensed correctly like in this case as it is based on a CC0 Creative Commons from Pixabay https://pixabay.com/en/pretty-woman-happy-young-female-1509956/. Keep up the good work :) With kind regards, BeeBringer (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BeeBringer: so what? It is {{CC0}} – practically, public domain. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: I could not understand why it was deleted on basis of copyright violations when it is public domain? BeeBringer (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I missed the point. Supply {{Derived from}} next time to fend off copyright paranoia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: , thanks good tip! Greetings, BeeBringer (talk) 19:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BeeBringer: , when we (patrolers) copyvio-tag a recently uploaded file, it does not absolutely proof that it's a copyvio. In case of files uploaded as "own work", such as in your example, it just shows that the same image had been published earlier, which usually is a clear indication that the "own work"-claim may be wrong. Of course, even that assumption may be wrong in a few cases. But, we are open for discussion. If the files hasn't been deleted already, you may comment on the file talkpage, which usually will prevent speedy-deletion.
We are all aware that he overall situation is far from optimal. We are flooded with new uploads, of which quite a number are copyvios, which need early detection, to prevent that re-users are exposed to litigation by the true rightsholder. But, there too few users patroling recent uploads, so the workload makes a more thorough investigation to prevent false-positive impossible.--Túrelio (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: , I understand completely. No problem. Only thankful that volunteers try to keep this project running. Thanks, BeeBringer (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Maria Callas.2.JPG (hist • logs • abuse log)

It was not an “exact” duplicate and even less “scaled-down” one because of larger pixel size (height = 240 px) and, of course, different cropping (breasts partially included). Don’t trust random assertions without verification – I start to deem that this problem of yours (and several other Commons sysops) is systemic. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you are correct, but the (deleted) version had obviously been "enlarged", i.e. it was more blurry than the maintained version. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a lossless crop similar to the deleted one, but without retouching. Please, restore all deleted things to make history consistent. BTW, I still expect your comments about CAPTAIN RAJU who (presumedly) duped you into deletion of six legitimate redirects. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:PAROLE.jpg

Hii sorry for my ignorance while uploading images. how can we upload a film poster? which type licencing? and the normal image that took by me(which licence)... thank you --Yourmistake (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, movie-posters do always require an expressed license from the movie studio, which needs to be presented to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Also, the permission needs to be compliant to policy. See also: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters. --Túrelio (talk) 11:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change photo

Hello! How can I change photo of Katerina Konecna, who is member of European parliament. Current photo is horrible. Iam her assistant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lodyha (talk • contribs)

Hi Lodyha,
you need to go the the article pages on the projects (Wikipedia) where the older image is used. There you can either try to replace it directly or propose the change on the talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You for your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image

Hi. As I know almost nothing about Flickr things, wanted to ask you if the File:5000 Pledges! (16003060471).jpg does not have DW problems? Ty. --E4024 (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump-Kim Meeting v1.jpg

Dear Túrelio, Thank you for your reminder, please check the source of the file and remove the notice if possible. 10:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodtiming8871 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio,
I appreciate your professional source update on the image of File:Trump-Kim Meeting v1.jpg , Have a great day. :) 20:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Deleted image

Hello Túrelio. I'm following up on this deleted image: File:Ciel-variable-01-cover.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ciel-variable-01-cover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1) Thank you for your contribution. I appreciate your effort (from all volunteers) to maintain the integrity of this platform. I'm keen on respecting its best practices and I'd welcome some advice, please. I uploaded the image and sent the email below. Would you please let me know what can be done to make this release acceptable? Many thanks! / Muchas gracias!

---

Subject: release of Ciel-variable-01-cover.jpg

I hereby affirm that I represent Productions Ciel variable, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ciel-variable-01-cover.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

2018-03-07

[generated using relgen]

AtomAntPop (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC) ---[reply]

Hi AtomAntPop,
I've temporarily undeleted File:Ciel-variable-01-cover.jpg and added OTRS-pending. It be safe now, but will remain pending until an OTRS-volunteer has seen your permission. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Túrelio. I've also sent the same kind of permission regarding https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ciel-variable-103-cover-500.jpg. This one I only sent today, via email too. Can you undelete it too? Also, FYI, I just modified my personal info from the previous message. Thanks again and good day to you. --AtomAntPop (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Little advice

Hi Túrelio, I noted that you tagged image to delete which I was uploaded as an copyright violation. if I upload like this. 

|source=Name of person who has given (email/message)
|author=Name of authorize person

is that ok, also could you please conform what basis can create category about a wikipedian like this. 

Category:Images uploaded by Túrelio

Zi.jony (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you specify about which file you are talking? --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your question about the mentioned category. Do you want to know how to create a similar category for your uploads? --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your reply I'm talking Manisha Saxena's file, this photo get by FB messenger, because I'm connected with her in Messenger. Yes, I want to know how to create a similar category for my uploads, also want to know by which WP policy I can do it, because any time anyone can tag for delete. Zi.jony (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to File:Manisha Saxena.jpg, you need to contact the assumed rightsholder and ask her whether she has the full copyright of this image and whether she is willing to release it under a "free license", such as the choosen {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, which would allow anybody to use the image. If she agrees, she needs to send her agreement/permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alte Gesamtausgabe.JPG

Dear Túrelio,

I have uploaded the picture File:Alte Gesamtausgabe.JPG to illustrate the page Bruckner Gesamtausgabe.

The picture is a scan of a page put at the end of Max Auer's book "Anton Bruckner - Sein Leben und Werk", published in Leipzig in 1941. It is actually not a part of the book, but an annoucement for the "Bruckner Gesamtausgabe".
Max Auer deceased in 1962, and Robert Haas, who was the editor of the "Bruckner Gesamtausgabe", deceased in 1960.
Hopefully there are no problems of copy-right.

Please let me know whether I was allowed to upload it into Commons.

Thanks for your help, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Meneerke bloem: ,
nice to hear from you again. I am not sure about whether such an information sheet is above threshold of originality. Therefore, I've asked other :de users and are currently waiting for their opinions. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So far opinion is that the page is below threshold of originality and thereby not copyrightable. I've placed it also in the :de article. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke vielmals! As you can see, I am still active on Wikimedia with botany, but also Anton Bruckner's works. In addition to the nice collaboration I have with John Berky and Hans Roelofs, I have now also a close cooperation with scholar William Carragan about the difficult topic of the different versions of Bruckner's works. My practice of the German language is unfortunately not sufficient to adapt the existing pages on Bruckner's works of the German Wikipedia or to create via translation the pages I have created on the English and French Wikipedias. Best regards from Belgium, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9 images

Dear Turelio, If you can, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test files

Dear Túrelio, I just uploaded several SVG test samples only to learn that they (persistently) contained the same error over and over again. Would you please delete them for me, to avoid further confusion about my intentions. Thank you very much, Poeticbent talk 16:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143212%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  2. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143452%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  3. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143904%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  4. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320144720%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  5. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320144924%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  6. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320145123%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  7. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320145802%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Túrelio&oldid=292938951"