File:Transfer printing on enamels, porcelain and pottery - its origin and development in the United Kingdom (1907) (14590060140).jpg

Identifier: transferprinting00turn (find matches)
Title: Transfer printing on enamels, porcelain and pottery : its origin and development in the United Kingdom
Year: 1907 (1900s)
Authors: Turner, William, -1643
Subjects: Transfer-printing Pottery Enameled ware
Publisher: London : Chapman and Hall New York : Keramic Studio Pub. Co.
Contributing Library: Getty Research Institute
Digitizing Sponsor: Getty Research Institute

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
pottery ware, etc., onsunken or raised surfaces. There are other patentsregarding which it would be cumbersome and beyondmy scope to enumerate. But it might be useful tomention that in 1856, the first patent seems to havebeen taken out for the application of chromo-litho-graphy; and, in 1860, one for photographic decoration—both as adjuncts to the transfer print. Some ofthese instances have been picked out from the patentrolls at the Deansgate Library, Manchester. Thecontinuous sheet system, patented first by Potts,Oliver and Potts, in 1831, was worked to some extentby the patentees ; but, ultimately, it was improved andapplied at the Greenfield factory, near Tunstall, Staffs-Mr. Hales Turner took out a patent for it and he, inassociation with Mr. William Adams, of Greenfield,developed the system there in or about the year 1888. But this is carrying me beyond the limit of timeprescribed, only it was a sequel to another patentbefore the first half century expired. go Plate No. XXXIV.
Text Appearing After Image:
Fig. C16. JUG, EARTHENWARE, BLUE PRINT.J. & R. Riley. TRANSFER PRINTING on Enamels^ Porcelain and Pottery. SUMMARY OF GLAZE QUESTION.POINT in this inquiry has been made of the periodicity of the factories in the matter of glaze. They have been stated in the followingorder:—Battersea (including Bow) first, then Liver-pool, Worcester, Derby, and Caughley respectively,for overglaze. In the case of underglaze : Worcesterand Derby. Having since examined the periods ofStaffordshire, Leeds and Swansea, what do we find ?Regarding overglaze transfers none of these potteriesrival those already given in the order of merit of firstproduction. Following Caughley, for overglazeprinting, William Adams, of Cobridge, is sixth; theBaddeleys, of Shelton. seventh ; Leeds pottery, eighth ;John Turner, Lane End, ninth; Josiah Spode, ofStoke, and John Yates, of Shelton (contemporaneously),tenth; Josiah Wedgwood, of Etruria, eleventh;William Adams, of Greengates, twelfth; and ThomasMinton, of Stoke, th

Note About Images