Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tigerwater.jpg

Image:Tigerwater.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2009 at 04:42:03

•  Info created by Kinologik - uploaded by Dalmacia - nominated by Dalmacia -- Dalmacia (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dalmacia (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support /Daniel78 (talk) 12:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Just a suggestion, but there's a lot of unused space in the image. Might it look better as a portrait, focusing on the tiger203.35.135.133 13:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment For me, the beauty of this image is (moreover of the tiger), the background and the reflex of the tiger in the water. --Dalmacia (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very cool! Calandrella (talk) 14:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality isn't excellent - the composition is so so (2 much reed) - if it's a zoo picture that makes me even more determined to oppose because it should be razor sharp--Richard Bartz (talk) 14:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cool picture, but all the reeds detract from the tiger in the picture. Would be better if it was zoomed in more on the tiger and you change the DoF to blur the reeds in the background. -- Mountaineer (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --FilWriter 18:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Couldn't zoom in much without losing reflection and round ripples in water. Fits what we've always been told that tigers are about the only cats that like water. Dcrjsr (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As previous opposers. There are many good tiger pictures on Commons. JalalV (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Cute but not excellent. Poor detail and sharpness on the main subject -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Cute? -- carol (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• Shure, Kitty, kitty. --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose More tiger, less reed & water. Quality isn't perfect. —kallerna™ 13:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support exceptionnel et rare dans un environnement naturel, rien à voir avec une photo d'un zoo! --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition is fine, but quality isn't (noisy, not sharp enough, 2.5° CW tilt). Lycaon (talk) 20:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 21:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Image:Tigerwater edit1.jpg, not featured

•  Info I tried to zoom in a bit and showing half of the reflections on the water--Richard Bartz (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

result: no votes => not featured. Ö 21:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Image:Tigerwater edit2.jpg, featured

•  Info High size with 100% reflections --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Much better -- Mountaineer (talk) 18:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The images should link to each other using other versions. /Daniel78 (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment At last a version which is close to FP quality. You have done the best you can with the original material, and got near perfect composition. Just one problem, apart from resolution being only just good enough due to having to crop too much of the original. Now you can see the tilt. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Counter-clockwise rotation needed -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk)
• done --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 18:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I think this "cute" tiger is saying "Where are the zebras?" -- carol (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support prima --Böhringer (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Tigers never hunt zebras.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

• Is she contemplating a fresh cattail salad? -- carol (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Avjoska (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Ö 21:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)