Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/06/Category:Reconstitution
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I propose this category for deletion. I do not see any meaning in it. Marsupium (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Many other virtual reconstitutions of dispersed polyptychs might be in this category. In example of pictures would expose their original state :
- File:Maesta reconstruction.jpg
- File:PolyptyqueGriffoniProbable.png : The Griffoni polyptych, in its virtual reconstitution by the art critic Roberto Longhi in 1935 in his essay “Officina Ferrarese”,
- File:Polittico di San Pietro (Perugino).jpg
- File:Polyptyque de Sant'Agostino.jpg
- File:ChartreusePavie.jpg
- File:Rafael, Predella Colonna.jpg
- File:Vierge aux saints, reconstitution.jpg
- Perhaps the word reconstitution is't the good word. Which one is better ? (But the expression Reconstitution is used on many books : Roberto Longhi in Officina Ferrarese ; Diane Cole Ahl in Fra Angelico, Phaidon, 2008 ISBN 978-0-7148-5858-6 Reconstitution de la composition originelle, p. 226) Virtual reconstitution (in painting) ? For WGA Digitized reconstruction of panels. (And in french « Reconstitution virtuelle », ou « Reconstitution hypothétique » quand des éléments ne sont pas certains).--- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 08:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- This category seems to make a lot of sense as a container for all later reconstructions of lost works of art, as the above links show it. Best, --Catarella (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- (+1) Good category for lost works of art-- Adri08 (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I think you are right. When I started the discussion here, there were only two files in the category, one having nothing to do with the reconstruction of artworks. As for me the discussion can be closed. Thanks a lot for the additions to the category and the comments, --Marsupium (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Today they are 27 files and 10 pages in this category. I think you put out the flag now. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 15:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for all the improvements, especially for removing the nonsensical Category:Pala di San Marco (Angelico). At the moment the category seems to deal with polyptychs only. So I propose to rename it Category:Reconstruction of polyptychs. An other possibility could be to open it up for all artworks by replacing Category:Polyptychs with Category:Art works. Salutations, --Marsupium (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Today they are 27 files and 10 pages in this category. I think you put out the flag now. --- Salutations. louis-garden pinXit (On en cause) 15:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- This category seems to make a lot of sense as a container for all later reconstructions of lost works of art, as the above links show it. Best, --Catarella (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Reconstruction of polyptychs as per Marsupium. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)