Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2008
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Inactive adminstrators as of August 31, 2008
Per tool.
Users that are exempt or already de-sysoped because of longer inactivity (listed here) are not included. The rest have received a message on their user talk page on August 31 and have to respond within 30 days or will lose adminship.
- All warned per bot. abf /talk to me/ 11:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- All (14) de-sysoped by meta:User:Wpedzich after my request at RfP. abf /talk to me/ 06:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Inactive since last time
- Tim Starling -> exempt
- Jdforrester
- Brion VIBBER -> exempt
- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ->exempt
- TOR
- Svdmolen
- Brian0918
- Fang Aili
- Made request at meta, RfP abf /talk to me/ 09:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Dony by steward. abf /talk to me/ 11:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Informed, see here. abf /talk to me/ 11:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Dony by steward. abf /talk to me/ 11:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Admin response
Admins who have been queried about their adminship, please sign below. If you don't sign at all within 30 days after being asked, you will lose adminship automatically.
Confirm your adminship here
- tsca [re] 11:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Duesentrieb ⇌ 11:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Lately, I do mostly "mechanic" stuff, that is, editing protected templates, system messages, etc. Does that count as "asmin activity"? -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 11:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)- does to me. ++Lar: t/c 14:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I belive it counts only sysop activity mentiont in the logs. Correct me if I am wrong. abf /talk to me/ 15:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I think you're right. I'm just saying I think we should count these just the same, even if the bot does not. As I said, I think Bryan's rather busy but perhaps a request to him? ++Lar: t/c 17:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- We should definitely count it. If the rights allow them to improve Commons, I'm all for it. Rocket000(talk) 18:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I think you're right. I'm just saying I think we should count these just the same, even if the bot does not. As I said, I think Bryan's rather busy but perhaps a request to him? ++Lar: t/c 17:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I belive it counts only sysop activity mentiont in the logs. Correct me if I am wrong. abf /talk to me/ 15:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- does to me. ++Lar: t/c 14:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- notafish }<';> 13:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC) as silly as ever, this policy :)
- Ram-Man 13:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Always thought this was a crazy policy, but whatever... And I'm sure editing protected templates doesn't count.
- Editing protected templates does count, even if the bot didn't count them, if you did some, just give an idea of which... ++Lar: t/c 14:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I belive it counts only sysop activity mentiont in the logs. Correct me if I am wrong. abf /talk to me/ 15:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Editing protected templates does count, even if the bot didn't count them, if you did some, just give an idea of which... ++Lar: t/c 14:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep me! :-) Magnus Manske (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: I moved this from the parent page. ++Lar: t/c 17:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep me please ! Anthere (talk) 16:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- You're on the exempt list! (see Commons:Administrators/Inactivity_section#Exempt) Thanks for turning up just the same. :) ++Lar: t/c 17:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I would like to stay, too. As for the definition of admin action, please see Commons talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Definition of Admin action -- Chris 73 (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- ignis (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Morven did not sign, but made this edit marking himself as signed. That's effectively "signing" although it's not quite following the instructions exactly :) ... clearly intent was shown. ++Lar: t/c 11:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Petrusbarbygere (talk) If you need edit 00:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC) I'm still here. I'm enjoy to stay. I hope i'm util for the community. I make some contributions Image:Buet fond.jpg.
- Pimke (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'd like to remain a Commons admin. Quadell (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- jossi (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Been busy with university. I still want to be an admin! --Oldak Quill 16:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I was not very active for some time, but I intend to spend more time for adminship in future. MaxiMaxiMax (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- --D-Kuru (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've been busy, but I am still around. Jkelly (talk) 21:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Been on a long break, but would like to stick around. Whether I'll be able to clock up 5 admin actions over the next 6 months, depends on whether I find any misidentified plant or animal pics . . . a bit unpredictable! - MPF (talk) 22:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
To resign your adminship, sign here
- Fred J (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC) (I always hoped this policy would strike me, and I am glad it did. I have no use for administrative tools when I don't use them, and I have been almost inactive for the last half year or so. If I one day find that I again need the tools I will re-apply for them and likely (if the process works the way it did when I was active) will soon get them back. I bear no grudge and regret nothing about being one of the person responsible for the policy. Keep it going. To reduce administrative job though I suggest to make things more automatic, such as with the lists of admin and the note on userpages that this person is an admin, it could be made automatic, etc. -- I will continue to be active on Commons so you don't have to say bye-bye we'll miss you or anything; I am still here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred J (talk • contribs) 10:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)