(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Jump to content

User talk:Ferien

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Information
Babel user information
en-N This user has a native understanding of English.
de-2 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau.
Users by language
It is about 5:00 PM where this user lives.[Purge]

Hello. Please leave messages for me here. Remember to sign with ~~~~ and indent your replies using a : for each reply, if you are not using the "Reply" or "New topic" function. Thanks! (Sections that have had no chat for 30 days get archived.)

Removal of QD tags[change source]

Hi, Just wondering if you can look at Alex Lukason (actor). I've added QD tags a few times, only for them to be removed. Thanks! Yottie =talk= 16:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's resolved, thanks! --Ferien (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add "Joseph Kony.png" to the wikipedia article about Joseph kony. Not the simple English Wikipedia article about Joseph kony, but on the main English Wikipedia article about him? MilkAndStrawberryPutin (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MilkAndStrawberryPutin, I'm sorry, but I am not going to do that for you. Please do not use this wiki as a tool to get proxy edits for enwiki. --Ferien (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What's proxy edits and what's the problem with them? MilkAndStrawberryPutin (talk) 20:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MilkAndStrawberryPutin, that is explained on w:WP:PROXYING, over on enwiki. To quote from that page, Editors in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned or blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to show that the changes are productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits. If an editor is blocked and another editor just makes the edits for them as though nothing happened, there isn't really a point in that first editor being blocked if the second editor is just going to be doing the same thing. --Ferien (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked because I got annoyed with another editor and I started acting like a jerk, I tried to make appeals but I don't think anyone's reading my newest one where I explained i changed. Also, in your quote, you said "unless they are able to show productive/independent reasons for edits." There's multiple definitions of the words independent and productive on Google, which definition are you talking about when you use those words? And how do I show that the edits are productive or independent once I find out which definition your talking about, who do I talk to? MilkAndStrawberryPutin (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MilkAndStrawberryPutin, the changes need to be productive (I would interpret that as constructive/helpful) and the editors making the edits on behalf of the blocked editor need to have independent reasons for making such edits (ie their own reasons, not just the blocked editor's). --Ferien (talk) 11:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I already talked to another editor and he did the edit for me but logged out of his account so he doesn't get blocked for making edits for a blocked editor. I think his edit was helpful because it shows the reader what Joseph Kony looks like and it makes the article look good. And the guy that made the edit had an independent reason for making the edit, he felt like it would make the page nicer and he agreed with me. So yeah, hopefully that edit doesn't get undone because it makes the article look good or something MilkAndStrawberryPutin (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ferien, Hope you're well, I'm confused by your edit summary here - How is reverting a globally-banned user edit warring ?, Should we stop reverting and allow the vandalism to stand until an admin comes on to block the IP whom in 5 minutes will be back adding his rants again?.... I'm baffled...., Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey2010, It doesn't meet the exact definition for edit warring, as it is vandalism and so should definitely be reverted, but entertaining him by reverting constantly actually makes the situation worse, by flooding the history and recent changes with his attacks that are very often eligible for RevDel and occasionally oversight. If it is left until he is blocked at least (per w:WP:BRI), there's nothing for him to do. But when he's reverted, it's a new roll of the dice for whether he'll decide to just revert back or produce an edit summary attacking editors, imo. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ferien, So much I wanna say but per BEANS I'll keep hush, Your idea's a good one and one I will follow, Thank you for explaining that - it actually makes sense now you've explained it :), Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010Talk 17:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On a related topic, I would like to hear if you have any recommendations in light of this conversation on Meta-Wiki: meta:User talk:EPIC#SRG abuse filter. If not, that's fine. Kk.urban (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to email me if necessary. Kk.urban (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kk.urban, this is probably somewhere where my personal views differ slightly from the steward team, in that it can be useful to block the IPs he uses in almost all cases, as long as it was used within the last few hours. Unless he's found some magical teleportation machine to travel between continents (surprised that's not one of his claims yet), the IPs he uses are almost definitely P2P proxies and there have been instances in the past where he's used the same IP a few days later. So generally, I prefer to block these IPs for about a week at a time, as they can either be used again a few days after or just go back to not being proxies. From a steward POV though, it is often quite difficult to block every IP GRP has been using (usually only on a single wiki), and when SRG is backlogged, reports can very easily become stale. They encourage IRC reports for that reason, to ping active stewards, although I disagree with that because all SRG reports are logged on IRC anyway, and using IRC shouldn't be a requirement. If a steward is active at the time, like EPIC was in this situation, then reports aren't needed as they are watching our wiki and helping out for us. I hope this answers your question. --Ferien (talk) 18:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PP Request[change source]

Hi @Ferien, Can you protect all of my userpages? Thankyou (: DIVINE (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DIVINE  Done :) --Ferien (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-20[change source]

Tech News: 2024-20[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-21[change source]

Tech News: 2024-21[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-22[change source]

Tech News: 2024-22[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-23[change source]

Tech News: 2024-23[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-24[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-25[change source]

Tech News: 2024-25[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-26[change source]

Tech News: 2024-26[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-27[change source]

The winner this Translation of the week is

Please be bold and help translate this article!


Roller printing on fabrics is a textile printing process patented by Thomas Bell of Scotland in 1783 in an attempt to reduce the cost of the earlier copperplate printing. This method was used in Lancashire fabric mills to produce cotton dress fabrics from the 1790s, most often reproducing small monochrome patterns characterized by striped motifs and tiny dotted patterns called "machine grounds". Improvements in the technology resulted in more elaborate roller prints in bright, rich colours from the 1820s; Turkey red and chrome yellow were particularly popular.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)


About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-27[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-28[change source]

The winner this Translation of the week is

Please be bold and help translate this article!


The India naming dispute in 1947 refers to the argument over the use of the name India during and after the partition of British Raj, between the countries of Pakistan and the Republic of India. This dispute involved key figures such as Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of British Raj, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim League and a founder of Pakistan. By 1947, the British Raj was going to be divided into two new nation states – Hindustan and Pakistan. Jinnah was initially convinced that Hindustan would not use the term India, since it lacked indigenous pedigree, etymologically and historically India meant the Indus Valley (modern-Pakistan). He also opposed the use of the name India as it would cause confusion regarding history. The disagreement had significant implications for national identity and international recognition.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)


About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-28[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[change source]

Hello, Ferien. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion.
Message added 08:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-29[change source]

The winner this Translation of the week is

Please be bold and help translate this article!


Adumu, is a type of dance that the Maasai people of Kenya and Tanzania practice. Young Maasai warriors generally perform the energetic and acrobatic dance at ceremonial occasions including weddings, religious rites, and other significant cultural events. The Adumu dance is characterized by a sequence of jumps performed by the dancers, who stand in a circle and alternately jump while keeping their bodies as straight and upright as possible. In addition to wearing vividly colored shúkàs (clothes) and beaded jewelry, the dancers are typically clad in traditional Maasai costume. Traditional Maasai songs and chants are also performed during the dance.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)


About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-29[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article wizard[change source]

On some pages of the article wizard, there are tabs with redlinks. They are pages such as:

There are links on the tabs that say "Introduction", "Subject", and in some cases, "Notability" and "Sources". But are these necessary? 2607:F140:6000:806A:755A:8FB:CCBA:6EB4 (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An example was here: Wikipedia:Article wizard/version1/Content. This page was created over a redlink because they thought it was the right place to create an article. 2607:F140:6000:806A:755A:8FB:CCBA:6EB4 (talk) 04:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) It may be neccessary to keep uniformity between the different pages Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly don't know why we even have the Article Wizard when it doesn't even function, I've only seen it being use twice in the last two years, I think? But this discussion probably benefits from having more eyes at WP:Simple talk instead of Ferien's user talk page. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 13:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, a discussion like this shouldn't be confined to an user's talk page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fehufanga It gets used a lot. See Category:Pages created with the Article Wizard. 2601:644:9083:5730:699C:4277:F713:D4C3 (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]