User talk:Nigos: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 83.25.98.113 (talk) to last version by Computer Fizz Tag: Rollback |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It was not necessary to remove that unblock request from my talk page. Although we have a standard procedure for requesting unblocks, sometimes people do make requests on admins' talk pages instead. Besides that, you removing the request could be seen as interfering with a user's communication with an admin. It's usually best not to revert changes on other users' talk pages -- admin or not -- unless it's clear vandalism, which this was not. --[[User:Auntof6|Auntof6]] ([[User talk:Auntof6|talk]]) 19:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC) |
It was not necessary to remove that unblock request from my talk page. Although we have a standard procedure for requesting unblocks, sometimes people do make requests on admins' talk pages instead. Besides that, you removing the request could be seen as interfering with a user's communication with an admin. It's usually best not to revert changes on other users' talk pages -- admin or not -- unless it's clear vandalism, which this was not. --[[User:Auntof6|Auntof6]] ([[User talk:Auntof6|talk]]) 19:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{tps}} Auntof6 has also mentioned [https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Computer_Fizz&oldid=6812917#Your_revert_on_my_talk_page the same thing to me]. I believe it was said that this is block evasion and that signing out+posting on an admin's talk page is considered a method of appealing a block, but I don't believe anything was ever reached. [[User:Computer Fizz|Computer Fizz]] ([[User talk:Computer Fizz|talk]]) 07:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC) |
:{{tps}} Auntof6 has also mentioned [https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Computer_Fizz&oldid=6812917#Your_revert_on_my_talk_page the same thing to me]. I believe it was said that this is block evasion and that signing out+posting on an admin's talk page is considered a method of appealing a block, but I don't believe anything was ever reached. [[User:Computer Fizz|Computer Fizz]] ([[User talk:Computer Fizz|talk]]) 07:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Please demonstrate more niceness handling clueless users == |
|||
P.S.: I tend to make hints like this to folks who already do their stuff very well so I know it's worth it and THEY are worth it as they are capable and willing to keep improving. Seasoned IP here, but don't rely on me, judge for yourself. |
|||
[[Special:Diff/6952677/6952706]] |
|||
Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/87.148.44.217|87.148.44.217]] ([[User talk:87.148.44.217|talk]]) 15:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:08, 22 May 2020
| Main page | Talk page |
 Archives |
|---|
|
|
Unblock requests, and removing things from talk pages
It was not necessary to remove that unblock request from my talk page. Although we have a standard procedure for requesting unblocks, sometimes people do make requests on admins' talk pages instead. Besides that, you removing the request could be seen as interfering with a user's communication with an admin. It's usually best not to revert changes on other users' talk pages -- admin or not -- unless it's clear vandalism, which this was not. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Auntof6 has also mentioned the same thing to me. I believe it was said that this is block evasion and that signing out+posting on an admin's talk page is considered a method of appealing a block, but I don't believe anything was ever reached. Computer Fizz (talk) 07:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Please demonstrate more niceness handling clueless users
P.S.: I tend to make hints like this to folks who already do their stuff very well so I know it's worth it and THEY are worth it as they are capable and willing to keep improving. Seasoned IP here, but don't rely on me, judge for yourself.
Cheers, 87.148.44.217 (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)