Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions
m →Abusefilter helper for Julius 12345: Grammar fix by removing the s in outweigh. Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
*{{o}} Low edit count; per Eggroll97. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 23:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
*{{o}} Low edit count; per Eggroll97. --<span style="font-family:BlinkMacSystemFont">[[User:SHB2000|SHB2000]] <small>([[User talk:SHB2000#top|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/SHB2000|contribs]])</small></span> 23:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*{{o}}. If you were an admin or work with abuse filters in your home wiki and have advanced knowledge of regular expressions, then maybe I would support, but because of that combined with the low cross-wiki edit count, I don't think I can support your request. As EggRoll97 pointed out, this role allows you to see the logs of some private abuse filters which may contain sensitive information such as phone numbers and email addresses, and inappropriate disclosures of private filters intended to stop long-term vandals can allow such vandals to potentially evade the filters they're targeting to them. As such, I don't see a demonstrated need for you to have the global AFH role since you probably don't have experience helping with false positives on other wikis, and the potential risks of granting the abuse filter helper role to a user with a low global edit count outweigh the benefits. [[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] 🤔 [[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0a13ad">talk</span>]] 02:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
*{{o}}. If you were an admin or work with abuse filters in your home wiki and have advanced knowledge of regular expressions, then maybe I would support, but because of that combined with the low cross-wiki edit count, I don't think I can support your request. As EggRoll97 pointed out, this role allows you to see the logs of some private abuse filters which may contain sensitive information such as phone numbers and email addresses, and inappropriate disclosures of private filters intended to stop long-term vandals can allow such vandals to potentially evade the filters they're targeting to them. As such, I don't see a demonstrated need for you to have the global AFH role since you probably don't have experience helping with false positives on other wikis, and the potential risks of granting the abuse filter helper role to a user with a low global edit count outweigh the benefits. [[User:Codename Noreste|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0024FF">'''''Codename Noreste'''''</span>]] 🤔 [[User talk:Codename Noreste|<span style="color:#0a13ad">talk</span>]] 02:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
* {{o}} for the reasons laid out by EggRoll97 --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 14:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE --> |
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE --> |
Revision as of 14:11, 4 April 2024
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global sysop permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global rename permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rename for PurpleBuffalo
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: PurpleBuffalo (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 7 April 2024 11:34 UTC
Hello all. Being a sysop and a CU on hewiki, I would like to expand my contribution to the global community as well. PurpleBuffalo (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Oppose trusted, but to low crossactivity & global work, see [1] --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 11:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)- PurpleBuffalo appears to be an experienced hewiki user, admin & CU. I don't see a convincing reason why we would expect much crosswiki activity / global work when applying for this role with so much local experience. Johannnes89 (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- per above, I am now convinced that global activity is not really relevant for GRN, so I don't see any other objections. As a result, I can only Support this request. Sorry for my "requirements" mentioned above, which were clearly out of place here and too high. Sorry for that, --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 18:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- PurpleBuffalo appears to be an experienced hewiki user, admin & CU. I don't see a convincing reason why we would expect much crosswiki activity / global work when applying for this role with so much local experience. Johannnes89 (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support. This is not a GR that requires activity in many project.
PurpleBuffalo is familiar with name change conventions and assists in consultation regarding suspects requesting name changes.
~ · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 11:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) - Support Per Hyphen above. If they are active in the area locally and want to assist with global renames, why not?--BRP ever 12:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support - works for me. Global renamer does not necessarily require cross-wiki experience; this is not global rollback. Leaderboard (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I don't think I've ever seen "sysop (temporary), checkuser" in someone's CA before, that's an interesting permissions setup haha. But user can be trusted with these permissions, no concerns with lack of xwiki experience for this right. – Ajraddatz (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ajraddatz: It has to do with hewiki policy - admins are elected for three year terms, which is why no user on hewiki has permanent adminship. EPIC (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Even so, if the adminship expired or was not renewed by the community, shouldn't the checkuser expire too? --Ferien (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like hewiki requires CUs to be admins, so probably no (that wasn't the case here at least). EPIC (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ferien, @EPIC is correct. There's no connection between CU permissions and Adminship there. Admins are elected for three years and have to be reelected to renew the permission, while CUs are elected with no specified term. An admin can run for CU, and a CU can run for admin. However, a CU cannot be a bureaucrat, and vice versa. PurpleBuffalo (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like hewiki requires CUs to be admins, so probably no (that wasn't the case here at least). EPIC (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Even so, if the adminship expired or was not renewed by the community, shouldn't the checkuser expire too? --Ferien (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ajraddatz: It has to do with hewiki policy - admins are elected for three year terms, which is why no user on hewiki has permanent adminship. EPIC (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support No concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support —MdsShakil (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very confused by the oppose by TenWhile6 above. Cross-wiki activity is completely irrelevant to global renamer – the impact your actions have is technically global, but you don't need cross-wiki experience to move pages. This is a trusted sysop on hewiki who would like to go into renaming, I see no issue here. --Ferien (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- The only question is what actions specifically are intended to be performed for the global community mentioned in the nomination, but I hope they will be careful when (requested to be) responding to requests related to languages they do not speak/understand. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)- @Ferien I see that it was a bit confusing here, I just thought a global rename with global consequences needs a bit more crosswiki experience. Although I can understand what you mean, after some reconsideration I struck my vote and changed it. TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 19:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- The only question is what actions specifically are intended to be performed for the global community mentioned in the nomination, but I hope they will be careful when (requested to be) responding to requests related to languages they do not speak/understand. ~~~~
- Support trusted, no concerns for me. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't see any issues. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Lionel Cristiano (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cross-wiki experience is something that should be sought for Global Rollback. Renaming requires a different experience. Language, and local experience is perfectly okay. Trust is there since they are an admin and a CU on a wiki. ─ Aafī (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support. Neriah - 💬 - 18:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 19:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 21:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nadzik (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support, no issues here. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 18:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Count Count (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ok. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh ♥
(T · C · CA · L · B · UR) 01:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC) - Support -Fastily 05:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- DARIO SEVERI (talk) 11:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support as the accumulated experience is quite enough for this role. --Stïnger (会話) 13:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC).
- Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Rifat008 (talk) 08:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Abusefilter helper for Julius 12345
- Global user: Julius 12345 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Dear Wikipedists, I request the abusefilter helper permissions. I request permissions because I would like access to private abusefilters and logs. I am experienced Meta-Wiki user and a member of Small Wiki monitoring team. I have also experience in Finnish Wikipedia. I have total of 2240 Wiki edits. I would use this permissions responsibly as I have done so far in Meta-Wiki. --Julius 12345 (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question: why do you want to access private abuse filters, what do you need it for? --Johannnes89 (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose No demonstrated AbuseFilter involvement in any content project, and very little explanation in their request reasoning of what purpose this is going to serve. From fiwiki's AF setup, it seems a bit harder to get experience in there with the public filters (given that there is no false positive page and all reports of false positives are made direct to administrators), and abusefilter-view-private/abusefilter-view-log-private are restricted to sysops only, but I also don't see any general experience with suggested edits to the AF syntax on fiwiki, nor any specific need for the private filters. I don't even really expect that much involvement with them, just something to demonstrate that the user has some actual need for this, and that the user can be trusted. To the user themselves, please note this isn't primarily an anti-vandalism tool. The private filters, depending on which they are, can contain information that has to be held in the strictest confidence, and thus it is beneficial to all projects to ensure that the list of those with access to private filters is as small as possible, and especially so for the list of people who have access to every filter on every project in the movement, which is what the permission you're requesting would give. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with your second point, but AFH can also be used to aid in anti-vandalism. I'm waiting for a reply to Johannes' question personally. Leaderboard (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fair, though still not necessarily a strong use case for anti-vandalism either, given that they are only significantly active on one content project (and maybe Meta?). EggRoll97 (talk) 14:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with your second point, but AFH can also be used to aid in anti-vandalism. I'm waiting for a reply to Johannes' question personally. Leaderboard (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low edit count; per Eggroll97. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 23:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. If you were an admin or work with abuse filters in your home wiki and have advanced knowledge of regular expressions, then maybe I would support, but because of that combined with the low cross-wiki edit count, I don't think I can support your request. As EggRoll97 pointed out, this role allows you to see the logs of some private abuse filters which may contain sensitive information such as phone numbers and email addresses, and inappropriate disclosures of private filters intended to stop long-term vandals can allow such vandals to potentially evade the filters they're targeting to them. As such, I don't see a demonstrated need for you to have the global AFH role since you probably don't have experience helping with false positives on other wikis, and the potential risks of granting the abuse filter helper role to a user with a low global edit count outweigh the benefits. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 02:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for the reasons laid out by EggRoll97 --DannyS712 (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation