Mailing lists

Communication

Wikimedia Social Suite
Meetup
Babel
Distribution list
ComCom
Mailing lists
Overview
Administration
Standardization
List info template
Unsubscribing
Wikimedia IRC
Channels listing
#wikidata-admin
#wikimedia-admin
#wikipedia-en-admins
Channel operators
#wikimedia-admin
#wikipedia-en-admins
#wikipedia and #wikipedia-en
Instructions
Guidelines
#wikipedia
Group Contacts
Noticeboard & Log
Cloaks
Bots
FAQ
Stalkwords
Quotes (en)
archives
Quotes (fr)
Other chat networks
Telegram
Discord
Matrix.org
Steam
[Edit]

bg | ar | da | de | en | es | fr | ja | mr| nl | pt | simple | si | zh

For an overview of all mailing lists, see Mailing lists/Overview

The Wikimedia Foundation has a number of mailing lists which are open to anyone who subscribes. Please see the list descriptions for posting information. Most lists disallow any posts by nonmembers, but allow anyone to subscribe and read the archives.

Please respect Wikiquette and avoid personal attacks on the mailing lists, especially in the subject header as this is likely to be repeated by those replying. To request a new mailing list, see the instructions below.

General information

Mailing lists are available in a number of formats: via a web archive, by email, or by NNTP using the mail-to-news gateway Gmane. Offsite archives of Wikipedia's mailing lists can be found at Gmane, MARC, and MarkMail.

Some of the mailing lists are occasionally summarized at the List Summary Service page.

Top posters and other statistics can be found at Wikimedia Mail Stats: index

Archives

Almost all mailing lists archive their posts and you can view these archives online by clicking the link on the main list information page. As in all forums on the internet, you're warmly encouraged to search and scan the archives for past discussions, before asking a question or making a proposal. Not doing so reduces the signal : noise ratio, hence it is considered uncivil and disruptive.

Community ban proposal - User:Zsfgseg

	+	
	+	

	+	

Zsfgseg (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)

	+	
	+	

see also: Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Zsfgseg

	+	
	+	

This user was initially blocked for vandalizing AN/I. Since that block he has repeatedly evaded his block, wanting a second chance (which is always denied because (a) his registered socks share the same name, and (b) he goes right back to the same behavior that got him blocked). Even more recently, he's been resorting to pestering me on IRC, seeking an unblock (usually after one of his socks gets caught), but today he followed up an IRC PM with this post to my talk page.

	+	
	+	

It is clear to me that he flat-out does not get it, and his repeated communication with me is starting to border on harassment. I am seeking a community ban against him for these reasons. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 02:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support Ban There's no excuse for that behavior and it's obvious he's just here to screw around, play games and act a fool. I think he DOES get it: this person has no desire to edit but gets his jollies by playing this game. Kindzmarauli (talk) 05:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support per above and his attempt to remove this discussion[1] -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• • IP is now blocked. TFOWR 21:00, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support – Just formally ban him already; he's virtually de facto banned, anyways, as no admin in their right mind would even consider unblocking. –MuZemike 21:15, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support: Considered this yesterday, decided to sleep on it, no change of heart. Removing this discussion (per AnmaFinotera, above) suggests an ongoing wish to be destructive. Second chance comes after demonstrating an ability and desire to be constructive. TFOWR 10:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support; better to make this formal for the sake of clarity, if not anything else - the behavior is not acceptable. Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Note: Another user has been blocked for attempting to remove this discussion. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support Ban completly unacceptable behavior, reinforced by this last bout of socking. Dreadstar ☥ 20:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support ban. Although per MuZemike, he's basically de facto banned. But, repeated socking, inappropriate behavior, and that I haven't seen any constructive edits from any of the accounts or IPs are good enough reasons for me. Elockid ^(Talk) 20:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Note – I have blocked 71.249.0.0/17 for 24 hours his continued disruption and block evasion here and on WP:ANI. –MuZemike 20:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

...and again for 55. –MuZemike 01:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	
	+	

• Support, obviously. ╟─TreasuryTag►presiding officer─╢ 20:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support ban – Clearly a lier who purposely wants another chance, just because the user wants to continue to vandalize. By the way, what do you mean with "community ban"? Heymid (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

Comment. A community ban is a type of ban when you have been practically ostracized here. Like others said here, community-banned people have no chance being accepted again as normal WP editors, not after all the damage they have done. --Eaglestorm (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support ban - from the IP evasion I've seen just today I'm happy for this to go ahead, and per the other supports above. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 23:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support ban - this kind of disruption warrants nothing other than this kind of remedy. Volunteer time cannot be wasted by behaviour like this and so it needs to simply be prevented--Cailil ^talk 23:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

Consensus seems clear to me, I have tagged the account and added to the List of banned users. Kindzmarauli (talk) 03:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

If no one's willing to unblock him, it's unnecessary to go through this rigamarole.—Ryūlóng (竜龙)

	+	

Apologies for pimping this every chance I get, but for editors dealing with clean-up, this is necessary: per WP:3RR reverting an indef'd editor can result in a block for a good-faith editor. A community ban changes that. There is value in a community ban over an indef-block-with-no-admin-prepared-to-unblock. TFOWR 14:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support ban He's just screwing around, Wikipedia is not his play-place. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 04:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support ban per all of the above. The IP Address blanking this section is evidently the same person, still willing to evade their ban and try to stop this process.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Support Clearly his recent hijinx have verified the absolute necessity. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Strongest possible support. User is one of the most disruptive, attention-starved individuals I've encountered on this site - the username variations are proof of that since they're all variations on the same dull theme - and I've encountered my fair share. Further support for a possible rangeblock. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Strong support per his history of vandalizeing TTTSNB's talk page as well as my own past experiences with him. His childish acts need to stop and a ban will alow for quicker action on any of his socks.--White Shadows ^{stood on the edge} 01:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

• Strong support - and if it is possible to construct a tight-enough rangeblock, I would recommend that too. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

	+	

Using digests

Especially if you're not used to mailing lists (or bigger amount of emails in general) or you care less about some particular mailing list, it's useful to read messages in digests, which means you'll receive a single message containing e.g. all the messages of the day. You can set this in your mailing list options.

With digests it's way harder to actively participate in discussion (in particular the most heated ones): it's mostly for "read only" mode, voluntary or self-imposed. The next step is to disable distribution to your address and read only the archives when you have time (or even don't be subscribed). For your occasional replies, here are some tips to follow the mailing list etiquette and be sure your message will be put in the correct places and recognized by other list members:

1. absolutely avoid top posting, which is most horrible when replying to long digests: include only the message you're replying to, if any;
2. don't reply to the digest or create a new message to the list: instead, go to the web archives (for instance mailarchive:wikimedia-l), find the thread you're replying to, select a message (no need to waste time finding the exact one), and click the link after the name of the author at the top.
   • This will automatically retrieve all visible and hidden headers (mailing list address and others, subject, reply-to) needed for your reply to be correctly recognized by human readers, threads and all sorts of software.
   • Sometimes the link won't work. In such cases, on Thunderbird under GNU/Linux you can copy the link from the HTML source of the page and use it to create a new message from the terminal (or Alt+F2), e.g. thunderbird "mailto:wikimedia-l%40lists.wikimedia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwikimedia-l%5D%20Call%20for%20nominations%3A%20chapter-appointed%20seats%20on%20the%0A%09WMF%20Board%20of%20Trustees&In-Reply-To=%3CCAA2XHjAeA-ruyCUh5H9L%3D6g2hTrC0_%3DXYkvp32d9WjHgnM%2BUtw%40mail.gmail.com%3E" (remember quotes!).

Specific lists

A word cloud of wikimedia-l discussions: now you know what they're about

An overview of all existing mailing lists is at Mailing lists/Overview.

There is also an automatically generated list of public mailing lists, arranged alphabetically, at lists.wikimedia.org.

Wikimedia mailing list

wikimedia-l, formerly foundation-l, is the central mailing list for all Wikimedia-wide matters, whether they concern the projects, the Wikimedia Foundation, or the chapters. If you care about fundraising, starting new projects or debating global policy issues, this is the list for you. Posting in languages other than English is welcome, although English is a language most of the audience can understand. Multilingual posts (where the poster repeats the same text in another language) are also welcome.

Messages may be posted only by subscribers. Archives are publicly available.

• wikimedia-l sign-up - wikimedia-l archive

Wikimedia Announcements mailing list

The Foundation also operates an Announcements only list WikimediaAnnounce-l. This list is meant to provide a simple, opt-in list where people can be rapidly notified of Foundation and Chapter announcements, news and upcoming events. The list is moderated and all replies go directly to wikimedia-l.

• WikimediaAnnounce signup - WikimediaAnnounce archives

List administration

List administrators have complete control of every aspect of the mailing list, they can change individual list members' settings, moderate senders, change settings of the list, and more.

Please see mailing list administration for help operating the admin interface of mailman.

If you feel a list you are on does not currently have enough active admins to keep up with the workload, please first contact the existing administrators at <listname>-owner@lists.wikimedia.org. If they are inactive and don't respond, create a Phabricator task with your request and put it in the "Wikimedia-Mailing-lists" project (quick link).

Advanced questions and tips

Splitting up the Daily Digests

For Linux-Users there is a comfortable solution for splitting up the daily digest.

Put the following 3 lines into your .procmailrc and activate procmail support.

:0:
* ^Subject:.*mailinglist.*Digest
| formail +1 -ds >>mailinglist

Removing emails from archives

See also wikitech:Remove a message from mailing list archive

Emails should be sent to mailing lists with care, as removal of emails from archives with any degree of safety is nearly impossible.

Running bin/arch, as is commonly suggested, has the effect of renumbering all the messages, breaking all links to the archive. It's also buggy and has corrupted the list archives in the past. Because of this, our developers have made a policy of not performing any archive deletions. Instead, they will wipe the contents of the message but keep the message to keep the archives intact. However, this can still be problematic so please make sure you have a good reason for requesting an archive removal, bearing in mind that the email will still be in the Inbox of all the existing subscribers and in the archives not managed by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Translating Mailman

If your language is not yet supported by Mailman, you can help by providing a translation for it. Instructions and an explanation on how to translate Mailman can be found at wiki.list.org.

Create a new list

To create a new mailing list, you have to request it in Phabricator. The bug should be placed in the Wikimedia-Mailing-lists project, direct link with all the information included.

Before making your request, you should familiarize yourself with the standardization policy.

Things to include:

• requested name of the mailing list, ending in @lists.wikimedia.org
• reasoning/explanation of purpose (and link to community consensus, if applicable)
• initial list administrator's email address
• secondary list administrator's email address (as a backup)
• description of the list for the list info page (should include even if private list so ops and mailman admins know why it exists.)

Please note that all mailing lists are created public, and with public archives, unless stated/requested otherwise.

After submitting the bug correctly, your list should be created within the next few days. During that time you should read over the mailing list administration guide. Remember to add the mailing list to the Overview and to Gmane.