Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-02

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in February 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Nixten@ko.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Nixten (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ricatom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Boomir (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Netxin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Maksdays (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): I request that checking these users now. All 5 users edit patterns of drpp. furthermore, We think that these users is related to 100범 because these users have pattern of 100범 which we have collected. [1] These users had already been blocked in few days. but we request strongly that you check any obvious puppets, because 100범's pattern(and drpp's pattern) is that it makes many puppet almost endlessly. [2] In order to give you more information of 100범's pattern, We give you past request about 100범 to Zh.wikipedia. RedMosQ 14:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed I blocked about 70 accounts and some ranges. --Vituzzu 16:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, We should more checking about two new bees. Kogurean, Doksamus have Nixten's pattern. --RedMosQ 12:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed and Cogurean while ~70% Ronain and St9999 (as usual you should check if their editing-patterns are compatible)

--Vituzzu 17:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I think that Cogurean is correct. But Ronain and St9999 are not related to this pattern. although Ronain's pattern is that editing Korean historical article, he's editing is correct and he make references. St9999 is not related to it perfectly. --RedMosQ 17:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't think so, but do you think that Ronain and St9999 using Nixten's IP? By the way I think nixten start to use open proxy. This is the clue. --RedMosQ 17:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Katisk@fi.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Katisk (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Juhko (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Taloustieteilijä (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Keltainen ruusu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:fi:Wikipedia:Osoitepaljastuspyynnöt/2012/Katisk

Reason(s): User Juhko was blocked in fi.wiki two years ago. Since then he has used many sock puppets and recently users Taloustieteilijä and Keltainen ruusu were suspected. A local checkuser noted that user Katisk had used the same ip address as well. The case is pretty clear but it's two years since Juhko made the last edit in fi.wiki, so local checkusers cannot see his log anymore. However, Juhko has recently made edits at ace.wikipedia, so I hope you stewards can confirm if there is a connection between users Katisk and Juhko. Jisis 21:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

All Jafeluv's results are

Confirmed

--Vituzzu 10:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Ette ole ehkä tulleet ajatelleeksi, mutta tämän sirkusesityksen lisäksi on olemassa vielä yksi vaihtoehdonrääpäle: Ottaisitte tälle tunnukselle langetetun eston pois, niin ei taatusti tulisi enää yhtäkään pelleilysukkista! Anteeksi muuten noista kahdesta, oli kieltämättä hiukkasen ikävästi tehty. --Juhko 20:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletista@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Quintinense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Deletista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): User blocked by sysop in Duck test suspicion before a checkuser request. Willy Weazley 18:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please, view: list of sockpuppets. Pc^Talk 20:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quintinense is too old. Possible groups for the others are listed below.

1

Keptauto
Deletista
Carnatiba

2

Marcus Luccas
Locoabreu
Wesley2011

3

Carnaval9
Keptauto
Loggosul
Vembaixada
Sempreavantemeuimpério
Sambalagoas

Possible There are possible others, ~~but not digging further for the scope of the request~~ Will Dig a bit deeper after some time.--Jyothis 21:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

ptwiki Admins: Please review the following groups in the same range. Some may not be related, and the available info is not concrete enuf to mark them as confirmed or likely.

4

Mutaza
Arthur to
Gabriel Ferraz
Richard Leoni Leon
Othon Brando da Cunha Monteiro

5

Julianofischer
Tabierrenbach

6

Keptauto
Carnatiba
Carnaval9
Loggosul
Vembaixada
Sempreavantemeuimpério
Sambalagoas

8

Keptauto
Deletista
Veronykacosta
LucasAlmeida

9

Deletista
Carnatiba
DanielZacarias7
IBA RJ BR
Diasbc

10

Lopestitomatheus34
MachoCarioca

11

Luan borge
Fernandojorge1973
Melissa Ribeiro

12

Violet.Langdon
RodrigoGoMattos01

--Jyothis 16:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

ZZARTER@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: ZZARTER (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); User H (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); HRFS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Hudson Ricardo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: done

Reason(s): Per WP:DUCK, ZZARTER evaded a block and edited with a number of proxies and these three accounts in the last two months or so. Despite of the proxy, I need to know if it's possible to uncover other accounts. Thanks, --viniciusmc 00:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Will be doing the request above for ptwikisome time today. Unless another steward gets to this before I can get to the one above, I will do it along with the other. --Jyothis 12:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

ZZARTER
WZARTER
User H
Mr. H
Hudson Ricardo
The X
The User
Living
To Live
TRUSTH
HRFS
WZARTER
EcoLive

Confirmed --Jyothis 15:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Xelba.davi@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Xelba.davi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Bqa m (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:pt:Arouca [3] [4] [5]

Reason(s): This user is returning to edit the articles which were confirmed further checks. Applicant's use of puppets for this user. Érico Júnior Wouters 16:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed and also one more sock: R.r.berg (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser). -Barras 18:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

KAWAI@ko.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Shiholove (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Anivivi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vermout (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); V-ROAD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); KAWAI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:ko:위키백과:다중_계정_검사_요청#사용자:KAWAI

Reason(s): KAWAI changes article title without any discussion as his past accounts did. All accounts except KAWAI are already blocked indefinitly in ko@wikipedia by [6][7][8]. --이부키 07:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Completed - CU data is too old for others except for KAWAI. No related accounts found. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 08:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Carliitaeliza@es.wikinews

Status: Not done

List of users: Carliitaeliza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Carlita (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Joelin atope (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Andreita (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Roseta (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pepopintameloshuevos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Naxopeiro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Los usuarios fueron creados en intervalos de tiempo de entre varios segundos y/o un minuto, la primera de ellas en registrarse fue "Carlita", seguida del resto. Varias cuentas realizaron ediciones y crearon páginas que fueron borradas por diversos motivos. La usuaria Carliitaeliza fue bloqueada de Wikinoticias en español por diversos motivos MadriCR 20:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

CheckUser is not for fishing. Trijnstel 21:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Heecfyahoo.ca@en.wikiquote

Status: Done

List of users: Heecfyahoo.ca (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Heecf (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Hi I'm Stan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); CatBurningMassacre (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: q:Wikiquote:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_for_Checkuser_on_Heecf

Reason(s): Please help. Our 2 local Checkusers are both not very active and we really need help against active, ongoing vandalism. Possibly tied to Dantherocker1 (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 23:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed--Vituzzu 23:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Wait, confirmed to CatBurningMassacre (talk · contribs) as well? -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I haven't performed a second CheckUser yet. I have instead asked the local CheckUser, see here. Trijnstel 17:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 正義者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Goodeditor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Wukiwriter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Correctnews (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mytvcom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:WP:VIP

Reason(s): To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles, such as [9] and [10]. Puppets may be created to evade three-revert rule (WP:3RR). -- Gakmo 03:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

It's

Likely Goodeditor, Wukiwriter, Correctnews and Mytvcom are the same. Bettytseone is a

Confirmed sock of Goodeditor.

More accounts who are

Likely related: Boscobody, Specialgood, Sueling, Citywalking, Balleho and Turereporter. (Please check their edits.)

Rightpeople is technically

Unrelated and 正義者 is

Stale.

Kind regards, Trijnstel 18:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks!--Gakmo 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Donkey06@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Donkey06 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ogacihc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kroywenn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Selegna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Esramm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:pt:Anexo:Lista de países e territórios por área. See also w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donkey06/Archive.

Reason(s): Systematic vandalism, abusive use of sock puppets to change data of this article. Francisco 23:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Donkey06 is

Stale, but

Confirmed for Ogacihc = Selegna = Gabriel Rosetti. As for Kroywenn and Esramm, they seem

Unrelated. --FiliP ██ 10:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

LeoINTDP@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: LeoINTDP (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jesús Dátolo 23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:pt:Alexandre Pato

Reason(s): The two users are violating a policy (en:WP:NPOV) at the article Alexandre Pato. View: [11] and [12]. Pc^Talk 21:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Is there a reason to believe that they are violating the policy on multiple accounts?

CheckUser is not for fishing, and just because two editors share an opinion does not mean that they are the same editor. If you can show evidence why they may be the same editor, great. Otherwise, local dispute resolution and/or protective measures seem more appropriate. Have I missed something? -- Avi 00:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, there is good reason to suspect. Previously, LeoINTDP violated BLP in pt:Jesús Dátolo (view), the same name as possible sockpuppet. As shown previously, LeoINTDP had conflicts on page pt:Alexandre Pato. Please see the links and accept this request. I can answer any question you, but it will be a very bad English. Sorry for bad English. Pc^Talk 01:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Inconclusive Outside that their ISPs both are in the same geopolitical entity, I don't see an obvious connection. If another steward wants to review, that would be fine. -- Avi 01:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Turereporter@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Turereporter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Citywalking (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tonesmaybe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Moneyocean (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Aboutvital (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Heardused (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Thatturn771 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Passbybye (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:wp:RFCU, zh:wp:AIV, zh:talk:名媛望族, zh:talk:缺宅男女

Reason(s): The situation is like #Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia, puppets may be created to evade zh:wp:3RR. Their edits also include fake storyline[13]. Targets are mainly dramas with en:Natalie_Tong [14][15]. There're other vandalism like [16] and [17]. More importantly, we nearly can't find any "contributions". Naiveandsilly 08:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed that:

Tonesmaybe = Guideheads = Thatturn771 = Referspoke = Touchtouch666 = Moneyocean = Realblues = Aboutvital = Cloudraise = Haveseems = Heardused = Localbrief = Halfgoalsff = Tendssuch = Linesopendrr = Cleardance = Stepshaltdfgr = Handsblindships = Dataopenttr = Civilpaper = Beingsixty66 = Sleeppanic = Civiltypes = Axispenny = Madeblind = Whendropsada = Poemsnewly = Closebirds11111 = Bloodyears = Loopbrown = Aboutsteps55 = Rancheach333 = Totalahead = Hfduhfisudhis = Goalsclub = Comesroadhruhgr = Ideasroads = Spanblood = Wavesaway = Panelbased
Turereporter = Citywalking = Bettytseone, but likely Unrelated to others
Passbybye = Passbyby, but likely Unrelated to others

However, Rightpeople seems completely unrelated. As you can see, there is a clear sockfarm there, with somewhat usernames mostly having some kind of pattern. --FiliP ██ 10:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment See also this request above with some of these sockpuppets. Trijnstel 11:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. And, as an admin on zhwp asks (wp:AIV), could you please check whether those 40 users listed above are puppets of KellyMok (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate) or not? --Naiveandsilly 17:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

After a review of PeterSymonds we both agree it's

Likely the above sockpuppets are related to KellyMok. Trijnstel 19:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh, it may be a sockpuppets of Kellymok's puppet... Here comes the final 外劇迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate). Sorry for any trouble made. Vandalism is rediculously complex on those articles of TVB dramas. --Naiveandsilly 16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

That account doesn't exist. Are you sure you mentioned the correct username? Trijnstel 17:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

The account is 外剧迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)--Shizhao 01:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay. 外剧迷 is

Unrelated to this sockpuppet farm. Trijnstel (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Braz Leme@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Braz Leme (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Paulista Separatista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Russoww (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: [18] [19]

Reason(s): Users have the same interest in the subject, and use the same reference (a blog) to force your point of view. Hallel^talk 04:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The links you gave us do not provide any reason to check those users. pt:User:Paulista Separatista only edited the talk page, both others just have one or two edits on the page itself ... So no problem yet. a×p_de ^Hello! 10:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Spambot @ zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Special:log/block/Bencmq

Reason(s): There are tons of spambots bothering Chinese Wikipedia everyday and I started dealing with them since October last year. Vito helped me with a few checks and blocked ~300 accounts in the past. Many of them are stopped by our #94 abuse filter but some of them are still not picked up by the filter and needs a lot of manpower to tag and delete the spam pages. Please refer to my block log and make a throughout investigate the accounts blocked with reason of spambot. The account names seem to follow different patterns. Some are random alphanumeric names, some are alphabetic followed by numbers, some are of two random English words so this may suggest that there are more than one spambot operators. I can provide more details, but I really wish I had the tool myself (sigh).Bencmq 16:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Doing.... True that it would be better if you had the right to do it yourself. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Inconclusive I checked almost ten of these spammers, but there's unfortunately nothing to be done. All the ones I checked come from different IP ranges, some even come from different countries. I guess it would be better to improve the spam detection methods. I can help you if you want, just pick me out some of those spambot edits that have not been matched by the AbuseFilter and I will try to help you. Kind regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Chucknurres (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 31Julho1985 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); CAPGIGANTE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); WikiLord (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pepita Negra (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Joaquim C. Sousa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Al Lemos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Caroline Rossini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio.

Reason(s): No ano passado fiz denúncia e que confirmou o maior escândalo de sock puppets da WP-PT de todos os tempos aqui. Porém, nos últimos seis meses, ele voltou (Lacerda Bhahia) com diversos IPs e contas, que verificados pelo Utrace, todos eles são de Curitiba, Estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil, apenas editar bairros de Curitiba e pedir bloqueios aos usuários desafetos. Abaixo os IPs de Curitiba (English: Last year I made the complaint and confirmed that the biggest scandal of sock puppets of EN-WP of all time here. But in the last six months, he returned (Lacerda Bhahia) with different IPs and accounts, which verified by Utrace, they are all in Curitiba, Parana State, southern Brazil, Curitiba neighborhoods just edit and ask users to block rivals. Below the IPs of Curitiba):

187.37.246.249 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
187.37.106.118 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
200.189.119.250 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
201.24.29.84 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) (provável / probable)
177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) (provável / probable)

Nota: todos os IPs são iniciais 187, 188 e 189, o que demonstra que usuário utiliza é IP sock puppet (usa diversos IPs para enganar outros usuários e sabe bem das políticas). Há também IPs iniciais 200 e 201, dos Estados (São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, entre outros) aproveitam pra fazerem o mesmo, o que leva as suspeitas de combinação. Abaixo as listas deles, retirados do Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio/Arquivo (English: Note: All initial IPs are 187, 188 and 189, which shows that user is using IP sock puppet (use different IPs to deceive others and is well aware of the policies). There is also initial IP 200 and 201, the states (São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, among others) use to do the same, which leads to suspicions of match. Below lists them:): 2010/05, 2010/06, 2010/07, 2010/08, 2010/09, 2010/10, 2010/11, 2010/12, 2011/01, 2011/02, 2011/03, 2011/04, 2011/05, 2011/06, 2011/07, 2011/08, 2011/09, 2011/10, 2011/11, 2011/12 e 2012/01.

Lista de todos os usuários suspeitos (English: List all users suspected): Wikipedistas em Curitiba.

As provas ou suspeitas colhidas podem indicar que a Wikipédia pode ter sido manipuladas por muito tempo e só eu percebi (English: The collected evidence or suspicion may indicate that Wikipedia may have been manipulated for a long time and I only realized). Bruno Leonard 05:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Como aconteceu vandalismo recente com ofensas, [20] e [21], inclua esse IP e usuários na verificação, baseado nas suspeitas aqui. (English: As happened with recent vandalism offenses, [...], include the IP and users in verification, based on suspicions here.):

189.34.91.65 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jonathan Baltazar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jolielegal (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Deyvid Setti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Bruno Leonard 02:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I feel obliged to inform all stewards in here that User:Bruno Leonard is completely unreliable, as show by his frequents blocks on PT-WP. His claim is preposterous, there's over a million users on PT-WP and he's trying to prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba, which is the 8th largest city in Brazil and so it has a significant amount of users on PT-WP. It seems to me that User:Bruno Leonard is a paranoid conspirator, but I'll let you reach your own conclusions.--31Julho1985 03:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

So I came upon this and I decided to post the links here, in this absurd request. I hope this shows how User:Bruno Leonard in an unreliable, paranoid conspirator.

Links: [[:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-02#Lacerda_Bhahia.40pt.wikipedia|[[1]]]] [[:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-02#189.106.112.243.40pt.wikipedia |[[2]]]] [[3]] --31Julho1985 04:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done Seems like

CheckUser is not for fishing applies fr33kman 05:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. (English:I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) Wallinson 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Translate to Portuguese: Eu sinto obrigado a informar [a] todos os stewards aqui que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é completamente inconfiável, como mostram por freqüentes bloqueios na PT-WP. Sua alegação é preposterosa, há mais de um milhão de usuários na PT-WP e ele está tentando provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba, que é a 8ª maior cidade no Brasil e por isso tem uma quantidade significativa dos usuários em PT-WP. Isto parece que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é um paranóico conspirador, mas eu vou deixar você tirar [sic] suas próprias conclusões. (...) Então, deparei com isso e decidi postar os links aqui, neste absurdo pedido. Eu espero que mostre como este Usuário:Bruno Leonard não é confiável, [é] paranóico conspirador.
Quer dizer que a minha alegação posta pedido de verificação, ao tentar "provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba (...)" é "absurda"? Como é que eu tenho provas irrefutáveis da maior suspeita que você é o mesmo que se disfarça em diversos IPs, hã? Como soube dessa verificação, pois nem sequer foi avisado em IPs ou usuários registrados (veja o histórico). Aliás, depois que postei essa verificação, você pediu pra sair da wikipédia e ainda vandaliza minha discussão da WP-PT e depois no meta por duas vezes aqui (IP 187.59.64.61 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e aqui (IP 189.34.91.21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)), chamando de "(...) CHEFE DESTA GANGUE (...). UM BANDIDO (...).". Depois dessas edições, gerou dúvida: Por que esse usuário (31Julho1985) resolveu ser inativo, se o mesmo diz que não ter ligação e ainda depois das minhas denúncias? Esse usuário não é confiável e ainda descobri mais IPs em janeiro (189.123.241.108 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) e 189.123.242.154 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e ainda tem usuários já estão desconfiando de você numa votação Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza e o pior, ao invés de se defender, me calunia ao chamar de "conspirador paranóico". Pode ter certeza que vai ter troco e não tenho medo das suas ameaças. Posso ter problemas por conta de diversos bloqueios, mas não sou igual a esse vândalo caluniador.
Sobre reclamação do usuário acima (Wallinson), não estou acusando todos os usuários de Curitiba só por que é 8ª maior cidade do Brasil e que a WP-PT tem 1 milhão de usuários (na verdade tem quase 1 milhão), mas apenas reafirmar que há um usuário que se disfarça de IPs e usuários registrados. O mais curioso é que quando posto esta verificação é bem lenta, mas comparar com outros casos, é rapidamente feita em poucos dias. E aí, algum checkuser não vai verificar as contas suspeitas ou querem que eu apresente "mais provas"?
(Translate to English: You mean put my claim check request, trying to "prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba (...)" is "preposterous"? How do I evidences irrefutables of greater suspicion that you are the same as disguises himself in various IPs, eh? How did this check, it was not even warned in IPs and registered users (see history). In fact, after I posted this check, you ask to quit wikipedia and still vandalizing my discussion of the WP-PT and then the goal here twice (IP 187.59.64.61) and here (IP 189.34.91.21), calling "(...) THIS GANG BOSS (...). A BANDIT (...).". After these issues, generated questions: Why this user (31Julho1985) decided to be inactive, if it says it does not have a connection and even after my complaints? This user is not trusted IPs and also found out in January (189.123.241.108 and 189.123.242.154) and still have users are already suspicious of you vote in Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza and worse, instead of defending himself, slander to call me "paranoid conspirator". You can be sure it will have change and not afraid of their threats. I have problems on behalf of several blocks, but I'm not like this thug slanderer.
On complaint of the above user (Wallinson), I'm not accusing all users of Curitiba just because it is the 8th largest city in Brazil and the WP-EN has 1 million users (in fact has almost 1 million), but only to reaffirm that there is a user who disguises herself as IPs and registered users. The funniest thing is that when you put this check is very slow, but compared with other cases, it is quickly done in a few days. And then, some checkuser will not check the suspicious accounts or want me to present "additional evidence"?). Bruno Leonard 00:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done fishing, don't ask again. This request is now final and closed. fr33kman 00:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Tá bom. Mas que fiquem avisados, que se ele voltar cometer novamente, vou postar nova verificação e novas evidências. Mas se rejeitar, não me venham a dizer que estou errado! (Translate to English: Alright. But be warned that, if they make it back again, I'll post new verification and new evidence. But if you reject, I will not say I'm wrong!). Bruno Leonard (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Ele voltou com ofensas contra mim, uma hora depois. Não acham coincidência esse vândalo, que se passa outra conta, me atacar? Só faltam verificar Veloster e Maranhense, que recentemente fizeram ataques contra mim (Translate to English: He returned with insults against me, an hour later. Do not think this coincidence thug, that goes account another, attack me? There are only checking Veloster and Maranhense, which recently made attacks against me.). Bruno Leonard (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I've just closed both accounts Veloster and Maranhense, clearly troll-only accounts. Checking them I found dozens of puppets, I think a deeper check (plus a bunch of blocks) is needed. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Vituzzu, poderia citar quais são "dezenas de maionetes" a que referiu, aqui? (Translate to English: Vituzzu, could cite which are "dozens of puppets" that referred to, here?). Bruno Leonard (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Turereporter@zh.wikipedia 2

Status: Done

List of users: Haveplot55dff (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dreamrate (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Stagetones (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dothgraydgs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Milyning (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Heardarmed (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Shipneeds (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Same as above.ArikamaI 11:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC+8)

Two sets of sockpuppets are confirmed. I should note, however, that both sets are

Unrelated to Turereporter. Milyning is

Unrelated as well.

Group one:

Confirmed are:

Haveplot55dff, Guidekeeps, Shipneeds, Heardarmed, Dreamrate and Replyamong.

Group two (KellyMok):

Confirmed are:

Dothgraydgs, Draftholds, Stagetones, Watchstudy, Visithouse, Unitsideedgs, Limityour, Ageshead, Noiseorder, Moneyocean, Realblues, Aboutvital, Cloudraise, Haveseems, Heardused, Localbrief, Halfgoalsff, Tendssuch, Linesopendrr, Cleardance, Stepshaltdfgr, Handsblindships, Dataopenttr, Civilpaper, Beingsixty66, Sleeppanic, Holdsplain, Civiltypes, Axispenny, Madeblind, Whendropsada, Poemsnewly, Closebirds11111, Bloodyears, Loopbrown, Aboutsteps55, Rancheach333, Totalahead, Hfduhfisudhis, Goalsclub, Comesroadhruhgr, Ideasroads, Spanblood, Wavesaway, Shearbegan9999, Panelbased, Needwithwty, Pagetests, Atomtaken, Wingsradar, Courtsuit.

Comment I locally blocked the underlying IP addresses of both group of sets. You may block the accounts yourself (lots are already blocked). Trijnstel (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Carl Carvalho@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Carl Carvalho (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Arthur Chevailier (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Willer Mack (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Various

Reason(s): Carl Carvalho edit in articles where Arthur Chevailier (blocked per reason: "account attack") leave at least a contribution. See:

Dahuk (província): Arthur Chevailier - Carl Carvalho
Doruk (Created by Arthur Chevailier): Carl Carvalho
Estátua Bassetki (Created by Arthur Chevailier): Carl Carvalho

Moreover, the two users speak French. Carl Carvalho: "I know very well English, Portuguese, French language (my native language) and Swedish. See the User page of Arthur Chevailier. Willer Mack is duck, blocked. Sorry for bad English. Pc^Talk 18:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Group 1 : Arthur Chevailier, Arthur Fontaine is Confirmed
Group 2 : Carl Carvalho and Willer Mack is Likely

Group 1 and Group 2 is Possible, All from the same ISP--Shizhao (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hanguozhichun@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Hanguozhichun (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Caonimashanxizhu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ribenzhichun (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 大丹河 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 河南省泽州市 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Sock puppetry. --Keasung (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Why do you have some suspicions that these users are abusing multiple accounts ? I'm sorry, but "sock puppetry" is not a valid reason. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 13:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

user 2 - 4 are already indef blocked as sockpuppets of user 1.

It looks like a duck to me User 5 has only 1 edit which shows no connection to other 4. I think ~~I can close~~ this request can be closed as not done. Bencmq (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The user2-4 were continued to damage the entry about 晋城(Jincheng city) and 山西省(Shanxi Province). The spelling of user2 means "f**k your mother Shanxi pig", user4 was just identified as the sockpuppetry of user2-3.The name of user5 in chinese means "Henan province Zezhou city", but 泽州(Zezhou city) is another name of 晋城(Jincheng city, belongs to Shanxi province). you can check the edit history and the login records of these users.--Keasung (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

第二到第四个用户都已经是作为傀儡被永久封禁了，不必再查，请检查一下（点击block log查看）。The last user made only 1 edit in November while all other users are active January/February. Similarity in username (not even close if I say) is not enough reason to checkuser. Bencmq (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done per what Bencmq said above -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 15:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Citedcloud@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Citedcloud (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ruralendedrgerg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dutybirds (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Alivetype (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Arisemodel (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Turnsother (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lovereach (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 69.22.168.145 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 216.172.135.218 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 99.229.148.178 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:WP:LTA/KellyMok

Reason(s): The users I listed are suspected to be puppets of KellyMok, operating in exactly the same TVB dramas articles starring artists she likes and dislikes and committing the same vandalism. Miroir (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

For the convenience, I've made a list of the different group of users who create multiple accounts to commit vandalism in TVB related pages: zh:User:Miroir/sandbox2. The list is of course not complete yet. Since some user behavior are very similar, I do not know to which group they belong and therefore I need your help. --Miroir (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

There are two groups of accounts:

Roadsworth

Navalloans

Novelknown

Orderadded

Navaliron

Agentoften

Shorturban

Vividleave

Tiredurged

Dutybirds

Lovereach

Citedcloud

Ruralendedrgerg

Avoidtrips

and

Unitsideedgs

Dozenhopen

Limityour

Moneyocean

Mostneverff

Turnsother

Cleardance

Stepshaltdfgr

Alivetype

Proofloans

Arisemodel

Dataopenttr

Wavestype

Quickenemy

Nextkept991

Bloodyears

Leastempty

Both groups are

Likely to belong to KellyMok. Ruslik (talk) 11:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the help! --Miroir (talk) 16:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

李煌的老师@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 李煌的老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 李煌老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:wp:AIV

Reason(s): "李煌老师" is currently blocked for consistent edit war, original research and personal attack. While "李煌的老师" is the newly registered account joking about persons involved with him in random articles. -- Sameboat (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed

李煌的老师

李煌老师

李煌老师一

李煌的老师

李煌是学术骗子

Kongqingdong is a dog!

(SYS)2

黄志松

Panelequal

伟大的韩国

气功研究

反对民科

宇宙第一大国

李彦宏女士

银钨锗

Panelequal

苏州工业园区第三监狱

Stupidcat

鹦鹉者

看黄片上北大

王存臻

Zhxy 516

丁環是正確的

Historyexpert

FcukSihtSxe

杨启彪教授

Ruslik (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Polaco galeto@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Polaco galeto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); RoitS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: pt:Predefinição Discussão:Estilo navbox-tv and pt:Usuário Discussão:Dilermando

Reason(s): Suspeito que Polaco galeto e RoitS são mesmas pessoas. Primeiro, a conta Polaco galeto foi bloqueado por um ano por uso de users e IPs sockpuppets. Segundo, apesar de ter cumprido o bloqueio, aparece novamente com IPs e a conta recém-criada, citada em "discussion". As evidências são por conta do jeito de linguajar ofensivo contra mim e erros de português. Pra não ter dúvidas, ele já foi alvo de verificações aqui no Meta.
Translate to English: Suspect that Polaco galeto and RoitS are the same people. First, the Polaco galeto account has been blocked for a year by using users sockpuppets and IPs. Second, despite having completed the blockade, appears again with IPs and newly created account, quoted in "discussion". The evidence is due to the way of offensive language against me and mistakes in Portuguese. To have no doubt, he was the target of investigations here in Meta. Bruno Leonard (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done: Polaco galeto is

Stale--Shizhao (talk) 06:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Outros IPs:
Translate to English:Others IPs:

189.30.110.184 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
189.30.118.7 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Bruno Leonard (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)