Revision as of 02:54, 9 May 2019 edit Darryl Kerrigan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,048 edits m →‎Is it really WP:POV to call this a scandal? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:50, 9 May 2019 edit undo Harris Seldon (talk \| contribs) 443 edits →‎Is it really WP:POV to call this a scandal? Next edit →
Line 809: * '''Note''' - I have created an [[Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair#RfC: political scandal?\|RfC on this below]]. Also, I note that "dispute" doesn't really seem to be anyone's first choice here. Harris says it is the worst out of the three ([[political scandal]] / controversy / dispute), and supports "controversy" for the time being. CT seems to say his first choice is controversy. Everyone knows where I stand, nonetheless I am going to change it to "controversy" for the time being as discussion continues in the RfC below.--[[User:Darryl Kerrigan\|Darryl Kerrigan]] ([[User talk:Darryl Kerrigan\|talk]]) 02:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC) :Agreed - a reasonable stopgap while the RFC is in process.[[User:Harris Seldon\|Harris Seldon]] ([[User talk:Harris Seldon\|talk]]) 03:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC) ===The Quebec issue===

Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair: Difference between revisions