Content deleted Content added
→POV tag again: Please do not confuse the issues here by making false accusations of "personal attacks" (Paul Siebert) and "tag teams" (Igny) |
|||
Line 416:
:::To facilitate your task, let me explain you that the idea I and Igny support is not to remove the word "occupation", but to add the word "annexation", which has been recommended by such a non-fringe author as Lauri Malksoo (and used in such official documents as the res. No 35 of the US Congress (2005)). Alternatively, I proposed a totally new title "The Baltic states under foreign dominance (1940-1991)" which, in my opinion, adequately describes political reality during that period of the history of the Baltic states.
:::Regards, --[[User:Paul Siebert|Paul Siebert]] ([[User talk:Paul Siebert|talk]]) 02:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
::::::It is not just in US resolution, it is in European resolution [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Occupation_of_the_Baltic_states/Archive_6#European_Parliament_resolution as well]. ([[User:Igny|Igny]] ([[User talk:Igny|talk]]) 09:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC))
::::There is life outside Wikipedia. Supporters of the USSR push the POV of the USSR in real life too. Please do not confuse the issues here by making false accusations of "personal attacks" (Paul Siebert) and "tag teams" (Igny).--[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]] ([[User talk:Toddy1|talk]]) 05:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||