Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase: Revision history

21 November 2023

• curprev 18:3018:30, 21 November 2023‎ BarrelProof talk contribs‎ 20,109 bytes +194‎ →‎We're not here to help startups raise funding rounds: copyedit and hopefully clarification (started with a focus on changing hyphens to dashes) undo

13 November 2023

• curprev 16:3016:30, 13 November 2023‎ Lizthegrey talk contribs‎ m 19,915 bytes +27‎ I went to look for this under WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE and was disappointed to wind up at a dead end. SERIESA is memorable if you're starting here, but not if you remembered the title but not the shortlink. undo

26 July 2022

• curprev 15:1915:19, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 19,888 bytes −159‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: per talk page undo
• curprev 04:5304:53, 26 July 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 20,047 bytes +2,075‎ revert a bunch of edits that change the meaning of the essay or argue with it, with a request that they be discussed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHorse_Eye%27s_Back&type=revision&diff=1100484894&oldid=1100435306 on the talkpage] undo
• curprev 04:1004:10, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 17,972 bytes −186‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: he's notable for whatever receives significant coverage in WP:RS whether that be his bank account balance or the fraud undo
• curprev 04:0704:07, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,158 bytes −349‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: thats a WP:RS issue but its not a notability one undo
• curprev 04:0604:06, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,507 bytes +31‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: address guideline misinterpretation, coverage and source were confused undo
• curprev 04:0404:04, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,476 bytes −179‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: contradicts WP:Notability: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." undo
• curprev 03:5503:55, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,655 bytes −110‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: this one also features in-depth coverage which would count towards notability undo
• curprev 03:5403:54, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,765 bytes −107‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: that one would count towards notability undo
• curprev 03:5203:52, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,872 bytes +10‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: absolute is untrue, if the coverage of the financial impact on involved businesses is in-depth it counts even if it doesn't touch on a broad community or the general public undo
• curprev 03:5103:51, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 18,862 bytes −146‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: not helpful undo
• curprev 03:5003:50, 26 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 19,008 bytes −291‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: this part is just not true, sources that "show the company is in business, or making products or money" can indeed contribute to reliability if they're in-depth, "impacted the historical record" is nice bit its not part of our WP:NOTABILITY requirements. undo

24 July 2022

• curprev 22:3322:33, 24 July 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 19,299 bytes +640‎ Replace description of what makes a source suggestive of notability undo
• curprev 22:1522:15, 24 July 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 18,659 bytes +3,456‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: clarify the point of this section undo

13 July 2022

• curprev 15:5015:50, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 15,203 bytes +43‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: reviews are generally in-depth enough to count... The only time they don't count is when they're based on press releases and specs rather than the actual article undo
• curprev 15:4715:47, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 15,160 bytes −5‎ →‎Conclusion: this is about companies not legal entities in general undo
• curprev 15:4615:46, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 15,165 bytes −675‎ →‎Conclusion: these two conclusions don't match up undo
• curprev 15:4415:44, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 15,840 bytes −392‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: thats not what WP:NOTABILITY is about... Broad audience has never been the standard. undo
• curprev 15:4315:43, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 16,232 bytes −523‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: Profiles most certainly do count... What is being described here is a tiny subset of profiles, the vast majority are in-depth undo
• curprev 15:3815:38, 13 July 2022‎ Horse Eye's Back talk contribs‎ 16,755 bytes −29‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: all of those things contribute to notability if covered in-depth, that is said later but it can't be contradicted at the beginning undo

3 July 2022

• curprev 07:0307:03, 3 July 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 16,784 bytes +111‎ →‎And what's a routine business action?: reference to another part of ncorp undo

4 June 2022

• curprev 00:5700:57, 4 June 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 16,673 bytes +33‎ Fix reference style undo

30 May 2022

• curprev 08:5508:55, 30 May 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 16,640 bytes +1,110‎ →‎What about these 5 interviews with the CEO?: cite reliability criticisms of contemporary business journalism undo

23 May 2022

• curprev 19:0419:04, 23 May 2022‎ Sm8900 talk contribs‎ 15,530 bytes +31‎ →‎See also undo

9 May 2022

• curprev 04:4904:49, 9 May 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,499 bytes +35‎ →‎So what is significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject?: locality undo

29 January 2022

• curprev 01:0301:03, 29 January 2022‎ Kashmiri talk contribs‎ m 15,464 bytes 0‎ →‎See Also: MOS undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

27 January 2022

• curprev 10:4110:41, 27 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,464 bytes +97‎ →‎Wikipedia does not accept 1200 (or even 30) nominations from Forbes for notability each year: clarify undo
• curprev 10:3910:39, 27 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,367 bytes +83‎ →‎It really doesn't matter how much money a company raised or has under management: clarify undo
• curprev 10:3710:37, 27 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ m 15,284 bytes +9‎ →‎We're not here to help startups raise funding rounds: grammar undo
• curprev 00:0700:07, 27 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ m 15,275 bytes +3‎ typo undo
• curprev 00:0700:07, 27 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,272 bytes +197‎ nutshell undo

18 January 2022

• curprev 22:2422:24, 18 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,075 bytes +47‎ →‎See Also: WP:NOTFORSALE undo
• curprev 22:2022:20, 18 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 15,028 bytes +49‎ see also wp:mill undo
• curprev 15:3215:32, 18 January 2022‎ Willondon talk contribs‎ m 14,979 bytes +17‎ →‎It really doesn't matter how much money a company raised or has under management: disambiguate 'Amazon (company)' undo

17 January 2022

• curprev 21:5621:56, 17 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ m 14,962 bytes 0‎ →‎Conclusion: rearrange undo
• curprev 21:5421:54, 17 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 14,962 bytes +11‎ →‎We're not here to help startups raise funding rounds: coi undo
• curprev 21:2121:21, 17 January 2022‎ HighKing talk contribs‎ 14,951 bytes +15‎ →‎So what is significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject?: Add link to ORGIND undo

16 January 2022

• curprev 23:1123:11, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 14,936 bytes +328‎ →‎What about these 5 interviews with the CEO? undo
• curprev 23:0923:09, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 14,608 bytes +1,269‎ →‎What about these 5 interviews with the CEO? undo
• curprev 23:0023:00, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ m 13,339 bytes −1‎ →‎Wikipedia does not accept 1200 (or even 30) nominations from Forbes for notability each year: typo undo
• curprev 10:0810:08, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 13,340 bytes +42‎ add more specific essay template undo
• curprev 09:5809:58, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 13,298 bytes +23‎ create shortcut undo
• curprev 09:5709:57, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ m 13,275 bytes 0‎ Falcon Kirtaran moved page User:Falcon Kirtaran/Wikipedia is not Crunchbase to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase: Finished draft undo
• curprev 09:5609:56, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 13,275 bytes +4,570‎ Finish first draft of this essay undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 09:0209:02, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 8,705 bytes +1,905‎ write more of this essay undo Tags: Visual edit Disambiguation links added
• curprev 01:5901:59, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 6,800 bytes +178‎ →‎So what is significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject? undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:5501:55, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 6,622 bytes +33‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:5501:55, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 6,589 bytes +84‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:5301:53, 16 January 2022‎ Falcon Kirtaran talk contribs‎ 6,505 bytes +5,434‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched