Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ingenuity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Courcelles (talk | contribs) →Support: +s |
|||
Line 46:
:'''9.''' Would you be open to recall, and if so, what recall criteria would you use?
::'''A:''' Yes, under this criteria: if five editors in good standing (1k edits, 6 months old, not currently blocked), including at least two admins, sign a petition for me to resign in a one week period, I will either resign or submit a reconfirmation RfA. — [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 12:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
;Optional question from [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]]
:'''10.''' Given the relative rarity of RFAs, how do you feel about the small number of new RFAs, and the even smaller number of approvals, compared to Wikipedia History. Do you think Adminship has become intimidating? Should more users be encouraged to apply? Why or why not? - [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] ([[User talk:Cecropia|talk]]) 18:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
::'''A:'''
<!-- Add your question above this comment. -->
<!-- Use this template to add your question: {{subst:Rfa-question|question number|your question}}. If you have two questions, use {{subst:Rfa-question|question number|your question|question number|your question}}. Check [[Template:Rfa-question]] for further documentation. -->
| |||