(Go: >> BACK << -|- >> HOME <<)

Justiciability: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎In the United States: rm duplicate full stop
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
→‎In the United States: use double quotation marks
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 23:
#** "an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made"; or
#** a "potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question."<ref>''[http://supreme.justia.com/us/369/186/case.html Baker v. Carr]'', {{ussc|369|186|1962}}</ref>
#* Political questions include such issues as whether the nation is '"at war'" with another country, or whether the [[U.S. Senate]] has properly "tried" an [[impeachment|impeached]] federal officer.
 
If the case meets any one of these requirements, the court cannot hear it.