Contents
- 1 September 26
- 1.1 File:File name.ext
- 1.2 File:File name.extHajduk footbal team loznani.JPG
- 1.3 File:Hajduk footbal team loznani.JPG
- 1.4 File:Calibre content server viewer.png
- 1.5 File:Selig Zoo Archway.jpg
- 1.6 File:StmShovelLA33.jpg
- 1.7 File:Thirstdvd.jpg
- 1.8 File:Bwraj.jpg
- 1.9 File:Billraj.JPG
- 1.10 File:Thalpraj.jpg
- 1.11 File:Rajni.jpg
- 1.12 File:Personal creation of invader ZIM make on paint.jpg
September 26
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:File name.ext listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:File name.extHajduk footbal team loznani.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:File name.extHajduk footbal team loznani.JPG listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hajduk footbal team loznani.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Hajduk footbal team loznani.JPG listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- Batispecela (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CSD#G7.--Rockfang (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Calibre content server viewer.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajindustries (notify | contribs).
- Derivative work of copyrighted cover art; use is not de minimis. I suggest another screenshot be made using a public domain work. Sandstein 06:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Selig Zoo Archway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tillman (notify | contribs).
- Image from UCLA Digital Library's LA times photo library, which is CC-By-NC-SA, which is incompatible. Not enough context in article to justify switching to a non-free usage of the image (shrinking size, appending fair-use rationale, etc.). See Previous discussions at
- Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 15#File:HollenbeckBH.jpg
- Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Archive/2008/March#UCLA digital library program
- Optigan13 (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image from UCLA Digital Library's LA times photo library, which is CC-By-NC-SA, which is incompatible. Not enough context in article to justify switching to a non-free usage of the image (shrinking size, appending fair-use rationale, etc.). See Previous discussions at
- Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 15#File:HollenbeckBH.jpg
- Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Archive/2008/March#UCLA digital library program
- Optigan13 (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- I've added
{{External media}}links on the two pages where it is used, so we don't lose track of this useful image. -- EdJogg (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- I've added
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thirstdvd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 69dressings (notify | contribs).
- Not nearly enough coverage of the R1 DVD release at Thirst (2009 film) to justify a non-free image. It's relatively trivial information anyway, and the image holds no encyclopedic value. The main infobox image is more than sufficient here. PC78 (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This DVD cover is for the United States and by displaying it in the article you are allowing international viewers to visually see what the film is about, exactly. The poster in the infobox doesn't actually explain the film visually. If you look at it it's really just a poster of a guy and a girl with a frightening facial expression, where as the DVD cover directly says lust, horror and romance which is what the film is about. Also the DVD image relates to the DVD release section in the article that alone should be more than enough. 99.243.97.117 (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nonsense. The DVD cover doesn't "explain the film visually" any more than the infobox poster, and what it says on the cover is irrelevant because it doesn't tell the reader anything that the article text doesn't (or shouldn't). We're not here to sell the DVD. PC78 (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I kind of agree with 99.243.97.117. That makes more sense than what you wrote PC78. I think we needed anothers' point of view. You're right we're not trying to sell the DVD, but just the fact that it has a R1 DVD of it's own and has gone beyond Korea makes for a significant display of the DVD cover. And I thought Wiki allowed Non-Free images so long as they relate to the article. 99.243.97.117 (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Signature on above edit changed to "69dressings (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)" by 69dressings [reply]
- Note that in the above edit we have 99.243.97.117 saying "I kind of agree with 99.243.97.117", i.e. "I kind of agree with myself." We then have 69dressings changing the signature, in an attempt to make it look as though this was a second editor independently supporting the first one. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/69dressings. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that the film is getting a R1 DVD release is not significant; lots of Korean films get released in the US or UK. Fair use policy with regards to cover art (WP:NFCI) is: "for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)". A few lines about a DVD release is not enough to warrant the use of a fair use image in this way, otherwise all film articles would have a DVD image. See also the guidelines regarding the use of fair use images in film articles (WP:FILMNFI), i.e. "The non-free image should be significant in increasing the readers' understanding of the topic". This isn't an obscure concept that require illustration. PC78 (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sockpuppetry? But I don't even write like that. It wasn't me who wrote that but someone knew. Anyways you can delete the DVD cover if you want, cause I guess it goes against your rules. 69dressings (talk) 22:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well then why did you pretend it was you by changing the signature to yours? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't pretend. I was on the same computer, then it later signed me into Wiki. So I edited the IP and changed it to my name. I didn't mean to cause any trouble. I really didn't think it would be a big deal. But now I know. 69dressings (talk) 02:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image fails WP:NFCC#8 Hekerui (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image fails WP:NFCC#8 Hekerui (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image fails WP:NFCC#8 Hekerui (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image fails WP:NFCC#8 Hekerui (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Personal creation of invader ZIM make on paint.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spzmnky (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, also Unencyclopedic . JamesBWatson (talk) 21:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no use here, Wikipedia is not a personal webhost or myspace. This user is one of a clique of kids who I see doing nothing but leave LOL messages at each other's talkpages; they've all been given warnings. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.